Pre-cum-Mains GS Foundation Program for UPSC 2026 | Starting from 5th Dec. 2024 Click Here for more information
Source: The post protests at U.S. universities against the war in Gaza a sign of the crisis has been created, based on the article “Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes: Behind student anger in US, three crises — democracy, university, protest” published in “Indian express” on 27th April 2024.
UPSC Syllabus Topic: GS Paper 2-international relations- Effect of policies and politics of developed and developing countries on India’s interests,
News: The article discusses how protests at U.S. universities against the war in Gaza reflect broader crises in liberal democracy, the university system, and the nature of anti-war protests themselves. Protests at U.S. universities against the war in Gaza a sign of the crisis
How are protests at U.S. universities against the war in Gaza a sign of the crisis of liberal democracy?
Political Immunity and Inaction: The U.S. political system has not responded to the catastrophic events in Gaza, despite having significant influence over Israel. This inaction reveals a crisis where political mechanisms are unresponsive to humanitarian crises, leading to frustration among citizens, especially young people.
Threat to Free Speech: Despite strong First Amendment protections, free speech is being challenged. Congress’s actions against university presidents suggest a future where free expression may be further restricted, reflecting a deeper crisis in maintaining democratic values.
Polarization: The polarized reactions to the protests and the political manipulation of these events deepen societal divisions, indicating a weakening of democratic consensus and increasing risks similar to those seen in other polarized nations.
How are protests at U.S. universities against the war in Gaza a sign of the crisis of the university?
Politicization of Education: Universities are increasingly targeted politically, not to enhance educational quality but to control academic discourse. The criticism of Israel is used as a pretext to challenge the legitimacy of universities, showing a crisis in maintaining academic freedom.
Loss of Institutional Neutrality: The university’s abandonment of neutrality has put it in the middle of power struggles, influenced by vocal trustees and donors, undermining its educational mission.
Repressive Measures: The deployment of police for campus protests, as seen at Columbia University, and the application of arbitrary protest rules diminish trust in university administration and highlight a crisis in governance and freedom within the academic environment.
How are protests at U.S. universities against the war in Gaza a sign of the crisis of anti–war protests?
Misdirected Focus: The protests often target university policies rather than governmental or international bodies that have a direct impact on war policies. This misdirection reduces the effectiveness of the protests in influencing meaningful political change.
Perception as Conflict Rather Than Principle: The protests are seen more as a conflict between groups (anti-Semitism vs. Islamophobia) rather than as principled stands against the war. This framing risks diminishing the moral clarity and impact of the protests.
Dilution of Universal Principles: The emphasis on internal university issues rather than the broader ethical implications of the war obscures the universal principles underlying the protests. This shift diverts attention from the core issues of the war itself, weakening the protests’ call for broader humanitarian awareness and action.
Question for practice:
Examine how protests at U.S. universities against the war in Gaza reflect broader crises in liberal democracy, the university system, and the nature of anti-war protests themselves.