Sending the wrong signal
Red Book
Red Book

Pre-cum-Mains GS Foundation Program for UPSC 2026 | Starting from 5th Dec. 2024 Click Here for more information

Sending the wrong signal

Context

Recent judgment of SC to protect public servants and private citizens from arbitrary arrests under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989

Stats on crime against dalits

India has over 180 million Dalits

  • A crime is committed against a Dalit every 15 minutes
  • Six Dalit women are raped every day
  • Over the last 10 years (2007-2017), there has been a 66% growth in crime against Dalits

Issues

  • Provision of anticipatory bail: As per the author the provision of the exclusion of anticipatory had been upheld by a five-judge bench of the apex court in Kartar Singh
  • Decline in conviction rate: The decline in the conviction rate for crimes against Dalits has created an impression that this may be driven by false filing of cases. But data from NCRB do not seem to support this contention. In fact, the share of false cases under the SC/ST Act has declined over time (2009-2015). Low conviction rates show poor investigation and incompetence of prosecution. Witnesses routinely turn hostile in such cases
  • Deviation from a set judicial opinion: The Supreme Court had clearly said that anticipatory bail provision for the first time was introduced in 1973 and it is merely a limited statutory right and not part of right to life and personal liberty under Article 21

Conclusion

Author concludes by stating that the judgment will have a chilling effect on the already underreported crimes against Dalits. The government must go for a review


Discover more from Free UPSC IAS Preparation For Aspirants

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Print Friendly and PDF
Blog
Academy
Community