The judiciary is referred to as the custodian of the constitution and protector of fundamental rights. It is the supreme authority responsible to punish the violators of fundamental rights and civil liberties. In this regard, it also has the power to review the decisions of the executive as mandated by Article 13<\/strong>. Further, under Article 142<\/strong>, it can pass any order for doing complete justice.<\/span><\/p>\n Both of these have been the source of power for Judicial Activism<\/a>. It is a philosophy that motivates judges to go beyond the traditional precedents in favor of progressive and new social policies.<\/span><\/p>\n This activism has been widely used during the 2nd wave of the pandemic. It was mainly to direct the government towards a more citizen-centric path. However, some experts are calling it an act of judicial governance<\/strong>. In this article, we will describe the pros and cons of judicial governance. Further, some suggestions would be provided to direct the future course of action.<\/span><\/p>\n However, activism must be done cautiously or else it may get converted into judicial governance.<\/span><\/p>\n Judiciary should prevent interference in the domain and work of the executive as mandated by the concept of separation of powers. Judicial activism would be counterproductive and would fail in achieving its laudable purpose if it assumes the role of judicial governance. It is one thing to direct the executive to perform. However, it is another thing to say \u201cif you do not do it, we will do it ourselves\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Introduction The judiciary is referred to as the custodian of the constitution and protector of fundamental rights. It is the supreme authority responsible to punish the violators of fundamental rights and civil liberties. In this regard, it also has the power to review the decisions of the executive as mandated by Article 13. Further, under… Continue reading Judicial Governance during Pandemic – Explained, Pointwise<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[130,9],"tags":[1337,1581],"class_list":["post-107048","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-7-pm","category-public","tag-po_2","tag-po_9","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","views":{"total":5,"cached_at":"","cached_date":1698333989},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107048","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=107048"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107048\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=107048"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=107048"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=107048"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Understanding Judicial Activism and Judicial Governance<\/b>:<\/span><\/h5>\n
\n
Judicial Conduct during the pandemic times<\/b><\/h5>\n
\n
\n
\n
Provisions\/ Tools allowing the judiciary to do Activism<\/b><\/h5>\n
\n
Factors demanding judicial governance<\/b><\/h5>\n
\n
\n
Why Judicial Governance is not good?<\/b><\/h5>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Suggestions<\/b><\/h5>\n
\n
Conclusion<\/b><\/h5>\n