{"id":190222,"date":"2022-06-13T20:18:26","date_gmt":"2022-06-13T14:48:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.forumias.com\/?p=190222"},"modified":"2022-06-13T20:18:26","modified_gmt":"2022-06-13T14:48:26","slug":"india-at-bottom-in-epi-2022-but-environment-survey-confuses-and-stifles-honest-discussion-on-climate-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/india-at-bottom-in-epi-2022-but-environment-survey-confuses-and-stifles-honest-discussion-on-climate-change\/","title":{"rendered":"India at bottom in EPI 2022 but environment survey confuses and stifles honest discussion on climate change"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>News<\/strong>: The <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/look-at-per-capita-on-environmental-performance-index-epi-2022-report\/\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">2022 Environmental Performance Index (EPI)<\/span><\/a> <\/strong>released on World Environment Day (June 5) has triggered much distress in India, as the country is ranked last (180th).<\/p>\n<p>The government has issued a fierce rebuttal.<\/p>\n<p>How do we make sense of this debate?<\/p>\n<h5>What are some problems with indexes?<\/h5>\n<p>Indexes are <strong>inherently problematic<\/strong>, especially when applied to something as multi-dimensional and complex as environmental performance.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Subjectivity<\/strong>: Index makers have to <strong>make judgements<\/strong> about what issues count, how they are best measured individually, and how much importance to give to each issue and indicator.<\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8211;<\/strong> <strong>For example<\/strong>, indicators may focus on current rates of increase or decrease in environmental pressures \u2014 as the EPI does for carbon dioxide emissions and tree cover gains \u2014 but under-state the accumulated effect that relates to actual harm, thereby ignoring past effects.<\/p>\n<h5>What are the challenges in measuring climate change progress?<\/h5>\n<p>Climate change is a <strong>global environmental problem<\/strong>, and because its effects depend on the accumulation of greenhouse gases over time, measuring progress in a given country is challenging.<\/p>\n<p>Climate change mitigation has to be measured against what it is reasonable and fair to expect from different countries, <strong>taking into account their past emissions as well as national contexts<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The problem, however, is that there has been an inconclusive 30-year debate on this question; any choice of benchmark involves major ethical choices.<\/p>\n<h5>What are some issues with the EPI 2022?<\/h5>\n<p>The index is severely compromised by how it incorporates action on climate change mitigation.<\/p>\n<p>EPI is essentially <strong>applying the same standard across vastly different socio-ecological contexts<\/strong>. For example, the EPI leaves out arsenic in water, which is a major threat in Bangladesh. Arsenic is not counted by the EPI because it is not as widely prevalent as lead, which is included.<\/p>\n<p><strong>High weight to climate change<\/strong>: Giving climate change a high weight in the index (38%) \u2013 a questionable decision, given the development needs of poorer countries \u2014 means the issue of past emissions comes to the centre of the EPI.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Poor choice of benchmarks: <\/strong>EPI relies heavily on the trend of greenhouse gas emissions by a country in the past decade as an indicator of progress.<\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8211;<\/strong> For climate change, 53% of the weight is allocated to these trends, and another 36% to whether the continuation of these trends brings a country close to zero emissions in 2050. They <strong>assume that the world must reach net-zero emissions by 2050<\/strong>, and so the appropriate benchmark is whether all countries are reducing emissions and reaching zero by 2050.<\/p>\n<p>Thus,<\/p>\n<p><strong>EPI&#8217;s approach is contrary to widely accepted ethical principles<\/strong>, especially the global political agreement on common-but-differentiated-responsibility (CBDR). It ignores the fact that countries have different responsibilities for past accumulations and are at different levels of emissions and energy use.<\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8211; For example<\/strong>, India\u2019s energy use and carbon dioxide emissions are about a tenth each of the US\u2019s. So, while it is reasonable to expect the US to decrease emissions rapidly, the contribution of a country like India should lie in becoming ever more carbon-efficient with its development, or increasing emissions but at a decreasing rate and as little as possible.<\/p>\n<p>This approach is guaranteed to <strong>make richer countries look good<\/strong>, because they have accumulated emissions in the past, but these have started declining in the last decade.<\/p>\n<h5>Way forward<\/h5>\n<p>EPI\u2019s flawed and biased approach distracts from a much-needed honest conversation about the environment in developing countries like India.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source<\/strong>: This post is based on the article \u201c<strong>India at bottom in EPI 2022 but environment survey confuses and stifles honest discussion on climate change<\/strong>\u201d published in <strong>The Indian Express<\/strong> on <strong>13th June 22<\/strong>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>News: The 2022 Environmental Performance Index (EPI) released on World Environment Day (June 5) has triggered much distress in India, as the country is ranked last (180th). The government has issued a fierce rebuttal. How do we make sense of this debate? What are some problems with indexes? Indexes are inherently problematic, especially when applied&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/india-at-bottom-in-epi-2022-but-environment-survey-confuses-and-stifles-honest-discussion-on-climate-change\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">India at bottom in EPI 2022 but environment survey confuses and stifles honest discussion on climate change<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10328,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1230,9],"tags":[216,10500],"class_list":["post-190222","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-9-pm-daily-articles","category-public","tag-gs-paper-3","tag-indian-express","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","views":{"total":0,"cached_at":"","cached_date":1701593863},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/190222","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10328"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=190222"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/190222\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=190222"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=190222"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=190222"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}