{"id":191089,"date":"2022-06-17T20:55:19","date_gmt":"2022-06-17T15:25:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.forumias.com\/?p=191089"},"modified":"2022-06-17T20:56:43","modified_gmt":"2022-06-17T15:26:43","slug":"there-is-a-concerted-effort-to-plug-procedural-gaps-in-death-penalty-sentencing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/there-is-a-concerted-effort-to-plug-procedural-gaps-in-death-penalty-sentencing\/","title":{"rendered":"There is a concerted effort to plug procedural gaps in death penalty sentencing"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>News<\/strong>: Recently, the Supreme Court of India delivered a judgment in<strong> Manoj &amp; others v. State of MP<\/strong> which attempted to reform the administration of the death penalty. The judgment is prominent in <strong>India\u2019s criminal justice jurisprudence<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h5><strong>The SC\u2019s Observations <\/strong><\/h5>\n<p>It reflected the state of the death penalty in the country. It attempted to fix a broken sentencing system.<\/p>\n<p>The framework of mitigating factors placed four decades in the <strong>Bachan Singh<\/strong> Case is not being followed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What were the issues in death penalty sentencing since Bachan Singh Case?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court, the Law Commission of India, research scholars and civil society groups have acknowledged a <strong>judicial crisis<\/strong> in <strong>death penalty sentencing<\/strong> in India. It has been on account of <strong>unprincipled sentencing<\/strong>, <strong>arbitrariness<\/strong> and high levels of <strong>subjectivity<\/strong>. The death penalty sentencing has been, by and large, crime-centric.<\/p>\n<p>The crisis prevailed despite <strong>requirements imposed<\/strong> on sentencing judges by the Supreme Court in <strong>Bachan Singh (1980).<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>What are the reasons for non-compliance to the Bachan Singh Framework?<br \/>\n<\/strong>There has been <strong>utter confusion<\/strong> across all levels of the judiciary on the requirements of this <strong>framework<\/strong> and its <strong>implementation<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The nature of the crime and its brutality has often dominated over the consideration of mitigating factors. The <strong>socioeconomic profile<\/strong> of death row prisoners has not been used as a mitigating factor into the courtroom.<\/p>\n<p>There is now empirical evidence that a vast majority of <strong>India\u2019s death row prisoners<\/strong> are extremely poor. They do not receive competent legal representation.<\/p>\n<p>Till yet, the measures have not been taken to put in place a system to gather the information required for mitigating factors.<\/p>\n<h5><strong>Manoj &amp; others v. State of MP Judgement<\/strong><\/h5>\n<p>The Judges must follow the laid down a framework to choose between <strong>life<\/strong> <strong>imprisonment<\/strong> and <strong>death sentence.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Sentencing Judges couldn\u2019t impose the <strong>death penalty<\/strong> only on the basis of the <strong>crime <\/strong>or <strong>aggravating factor<\/strong>. They&#8217;ll give <strong>appropriate weight<\/strong> to both the <strong>aggravating factors <\/strong>related to <strong>crime<\/strong> and<strong> mitigating factors<\/strong> related to background of the accused, the personal circumstances, mental health and age of the accused, to ascertain if a case is fit for the death sentence. They have to determine if the option of life imprisonment was \u201c<strong>unquestionably foreclosed<\/strong>\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>It has attempted to <strong>plug the procedural gap<\/strong> in gathering information related to mitigating factors. The judgment is clear that <strong>certain procedural thresholds<\/strong> must be met for sentencing to be fair.<\/p>\n<p>The judgment recognised <strong>reformation<\/strong> as integral to the <strong>Indian criminal justice system,<\/strong> especially <strong>death penalty sentencing<\/strong>. The sentencing judges must establish that there is no probability of reformation of the accused.<\/p>\n<p>The accused\u2019s life, both <strong>pre-offence<\/strong> and <strong>post-offence in prison<\/strong>, are relevant. The courts have to call for reports from the <strong>probation officer<\/strong> as well as <strong>prison<\/strong> and <strong>independent mental health<\/strong> <strong>experts<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What will be the challenges to procedural coherence and integrity in the trial courts and the high courts?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Achieving meaningful compliance across all levels of the judiciary will be a significant challenge. The sentencing judges do not understand the need for this wide range of sentencing information.<\/p>\n<p>In addition, translating these <strong>procedural reforms<\/strong> into <strong>substantive fairness<\/strong> in <strong>determining punishment <\/strong>will also be a challenge.<\/p>\n<p>There will be a challenge in producing detailed and high-quality sentencing information to the courtrooms.<\/p>\n<h5><strong>Way Forward<\/strong><\/h5>\n<p>The Supreme Court will have to provide a <strong>rigorous normative basis<\/strong> for consideration of these factors.<\/p>\n<p>The psychological studies ascertain that criminality cannot just be reduced to terrible decisions by individuals in the exercise of their free will. All our actions are a result of a <strong>complex web of biological, psychological<\/strong>, and <strong>social factors<\/strong>. Therefore, their understanding is important for discussions on criminality and punishment.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source<\/strong>: The post is based on an article \u201cThere is a concerted effort to plug procedural gaps in death penalty sentencing\u201d published in the Indian Express on 17<sup>th<\/sup> June 2022.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>News: Recently, the Supreme Court of India delivered a judgment in Manoj &amp; others v. State of MP which attempted to reform the administration of the death penalty. The judgment is prominent in India\u2019s criminal justice jurisprudence. The SC\u2019s Observations It reflected the state of the death penalty in the country. It attempted to fix&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/there-is-a-concerted-effort-to-plug-procedural-gaps-in-death-penalty-sentencing\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">There is a concerted effort to plug procedural gaps in death penalty sentencing<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10328,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1230,9],"tags":[212,10500],"class_list":["post-191089","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-9-pm-daily-articles","category-public","tag-gs-paper-2","tag-indian-express","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","views":{"total":0,"cached_at":"","cached_date":1704715936},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191089","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10328"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=191089"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191089\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=191089"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=191089"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=191089"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}