{"id":221084,"date":"2023-01-04T20:43:35","date_gmt":"2023-01-04T15:13:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.forumias.com\/?p=221084"},"modified":"2023-01-04T20:43:35","modified_gmt":"2023-01-04T15:13:35","slug":"preventing-animal-cruelty-is-a-duty-of-the-state","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/preventing-animal-cruelty-is-a-duty-of-the-state\/","title":{"rendered":"Preventing animal cruelty is a duty of the state"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Source<\/strong>&#8211; The post is based on the article <strong>\u201cPreventing animal cruelty is a duty of the state\u201d <\/strong>published in<strong> The Hindu <\/strong>on <strong>4th January 2023<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Syllabus: <\/strong>GS3- Conservation. GS2- Significant provisions of constitution<\/p>\n<p><strong>News<\/strong>&#8211; The article explains the issue of legality of jallikattu sport in Tamil Nadu. It also explains the issue of animal welfare.<\/p>\n<p>A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India will deliver its verdict on the validity of Tamil Nadu\u2019s law permitting the practice of jallikattu in the State.<\/p>\n<p>In 2014, in<strong><em> Animal Welfare Board of India v. A. Nagaraja<\/em><\/strong>, a two-judge Bench of the Supreme Court declared jallikattu illegitimate. Since then, Tamil Nadu has made efforts to resurrect the <strong>sport\u2019s legality<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h5><strong>What are the deficiencies in constitution and legislative structure for addressing the question of animal welfare?<\/strong><\/h5>\n<p>None of the<strong> fundamental rights <\/strong>contained in <strong>Part III <\/strong>of the Constitution are explicitly conferred on animals. <strong>Article 14 and Article 21 <\/strong>are bestowed on persons.<\/p>\n<p>Some of the <strong>DPSPs and the Fundamental Duties<\/strong> put <strong>responsibility <\/strong>on the state and on human beings to protect and improve the natural environment. But these are <strong>unenforceable obligations<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Legislation on animal welfare does not follow an <strong>animal rights approach<\/strong>. These are based on the <strong>ethical belief<\/strong> that <strong>collective conscience<\/strong> does not permit us to inflict unnecessary pain and suffering on animals. This approach was followed while enacting the <strong>Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Ac<\/strong>t.<\/p>\n<p>The <strong>PCA Act<\/strong> has shortcomings. While it <strong>criminalises <\/strong>several types of actions that cause cruelty to animals, it contains exemptions. For example, the use of animals for experiments with a view to securing medical advancement.<\/p>\n<p>Tamil Nadu amended the <strong>PCA Act<\/strong> in 2017 on the basis that both the state and the Union government have the <strong>power to legislate<\/strong> on issues concerning <strong>cruelty to animals<\/strong>. It specifically excluded jallikattu from the confines of the statute\u2019s various protections. It also secured the <strong>President\u2019s approval<\/strong> for the law.<\/p>\n<h5><strong>What are the arguments by petitioners against jalikattu in the Supreme Court?<\/strong><\/h5>\n<p><strong>Judicial review <\/strong>of legislation can broadly be made on two grounds. One, the <strong>competence of the legislature<\/strong> to enact the law. Second, the <strong>violations of fundamental rights <\/strong>contained in Part III of the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>Both the Union and the State legislatures have equal power to make laws on \u2018<strong>prevention of animal cruelty<\/strong>\u2019. But the law regulating jallikattu by the Tamil Nadu government gives consent to cruelty on animals. Hence, it must be seen as a <strong>colourable exercise of power<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court arrived at <strong>clear findings of fact and law <\/strong>in 2014. In <strong>A. Nagaraja<\/strong>, the court had held that jallikatu amounted to a violation of the existing provisions of the PCA Act, and the <strong>fundamental duty<\/strong> contained in <strong>Article 51A(g)<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The Bench said that it had a direct bearing on the <strong>right to life<\/strong> contained in <strong>Article 21<\/strong>. The expanded meaning of the word \u201clife\u201d now includes a right against <strong>disturbance to the basic environmen<\/strong>t.<\/p>\n<h5><strong>What should be the approach towards this issue?<\/strong><\/h5>\n<p>On any <strong>reasonable reading<\/strong> of the Constitution, it might be difficult to hold that animals are promised rights under <strong>Article 21 and under Article 14<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The better approach to the dispute is to maintain a <strong>greater faith in our Constitution\u2019s text and values<\/strong>. It needs to be seen in the context of our own right to live in a world that treats animals with equal concern.<\/p>\n<p>The judgement in<strong> <em>A. Nagaraja<\/em><\/strong> hinted at this approach.\u00a0 It held that <strong>Article 21<\/strong> safeguards only the rights of human beings. But the <strong>word \u201clife\u201d <\/strong>today means something more than mere existence. It means an existence that allows us to live in a <strong>clean and healthy environment<\/strong>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Source&#8211; The post is based on the article \u201cPreventing animal cruelty is a duty of the state\u201d published in The Hindu on 4th January 2023. Syllabus: GS3- Conservation. GS2- Significant provisions of constitution News&#8211; The article explains the issue of legality of jallikattu sport in Tamil Nadu. It also explains the issue of animal welfare.&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/preventing-animal-cruelty-is-a-duty-of-the-state\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Preventing animal cruelty is a duty of the state<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10320,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1230,9],"tags":[216,10498],"class_list":["post-221084","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-9-pm-daily-articles","category-public","tag-gs-paper-3","tag-the-hindu","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","views":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221084","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10320"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221084"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221084\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221084"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221084"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221084"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}