{"id":256951,"date":"2023-08-22T19:42:12","date_gmt":"2023-08-22T14:12:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.forumias.com\/?p=256951"},"modified":"2023-08-29T12:22:56","modified_gmt":"2023-08-29T06:52:56","slug":"times-come-to-draw-new-lines","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/times-come-to-draw-new-lines\/","title":{"rendered":"Time\u2019s Come To Draw New Lines"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Source<\/strong>&#8211; The post is based on the article <strong>\u201cTime\u2019s Come To Draw New Lines\u201d <\/strong>published in <strong>\u201cThe Times of India\u201d <\/strong>on <strong>22nd August 2023<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Syllabus: <\/strong>GS2- Judiciary<\/p>\n<p><strong>Relevance:<\/strong> Issues related to functioning of judiciary<\/p>\n<p><strong>News<\/strong>&#8211; Ranjan Gogoi, a former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, put forth the notion that the concept of the basic structure is subject to debate.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>What are some facts about basic structure?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>The<strong> Kesavananda Bharati judgment<\/strong> was delivered by a <strong>13-member constitutional bench<\/strong> in 1973. It introduced the <strong>concept of \u201cbasic structure\u201d.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The bench said that there are some things in the Constitution that even Parliament cannot change.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>What are issues with the basic structure?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><strong>Lack of clarity<\/strong>&#8211; There is a question regarding the extent to which SC can <strong>interpret the concept <\/strong>of the &#8220;basic structure.&#8221; The judiciary has not yet provided <strong>clear guidance<\/strong> on this matter.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Varying perspectives among judges<\/strong>&#8211; As per Ranjan Gogoi, the concept of the basic structure is <strong>subject to debate.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The current Chief Justice had expressed that the basic structure serves as the <strong>&#8220;North Star&#8221; guiding jurisprudence.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Historical perspective<\/strong>&#8211; When the Kesavananda verdict was delivered in April 1973, it carried a <strong>narrow majority of 7-6. <\/strong>The panel of 13 judges produced a total of <strong>11 separate opinions.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The consensus was shaped by the then Chief Justice, SM Sikri. He presented a <strong>six-point &#8220;majority view&#8221;<\/strong> in open court. However, four of the judges declined to do so.<\/p>\n<p>The second proposition stated that &#8220;Article 368 does not <strong>empower Parliament <\/strong>to modify the <strong>fundamental structure or framework of the Constitution.&#8221; <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The concept of the basic structure did not <strong>organically aris<\/strong>e from this judgment. Its frequent use to justify judicial interventions is questionable unless the entire idea is <strong>thoroughly examined<\/strong> by another constitutional bench.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Political backdrop<\/strong>&#8211; Indira Gandhi held<strong> considerable power<\/strong>. She wants amendments that would enhance the <strong>authority of the executive<\/strong> in pursuing its<strong> social agenda. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The judiciary was divided between <strong>progressive and conservative factions,<\/strong> and some believed that curbing executive power was imperative.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Extraordinary circumstances<\/strong> can lead to flawed laws. The notion of the basic structure was a product of its era. It warrants a <strong>reevaluation and clarification<\/strong> in the context of our times.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Other issues<\/strong>&#8211; Certain <strong>common-sense &#8220;basic&#8221; features<\/strong> have been disregarded by the judiciary. A fundamental aspect of the Constitution should involve <strong>checks and balances. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>There are questions regarding the Supreme Court having authority to <strong>exclusively appoint<\/strong> all judges to the higher judiciary.<\/p>\n<p>A dissenting judge in the NJAC case, Justice J Chelameswar, argued that the independence of the judiciary isn&#8217;t compromised simply because the Chief Justice isn&#8217;t the<strong> primary influencer<\/strong> in <strong>judicial appointments.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>There is assumption that the concept of the basic structure was derived from the <strong>thoughts of the constituent assembly<\/strong> that drafted the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>However, the chapter on fundamental duties was not part of the<strong> original Constitution.<\/strong> This was<strong> added in 1976 as Article 51A.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A provision introduced a quarter century after the initial Constitution was classified as an <strong>element of the basic structure.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Source&#8211; The post is based on the article \u201cTime\u2019s Come To Draw New Lines\u201d published in \u201cThe Times of India\u201d on 22nd August 2023. Syllabus: GS2- Judiciary Relevance: Issues related to functioning of judiciary News&#8211; Ranjan Gogoi, a former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, put forth the notion that the concept of the basic&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/times-come-to-draw-new-lines\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Time\u2019s Come To Draw New Lines<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10320,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1230,9],"tags":[212,225],"class_list":["post-256951","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-9-pm-daily-articles","category-public","tag-gs-paper-2","tag-polity","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","views":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256951","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10320"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=256951"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256951\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=256951"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=256951"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=256951"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}