![\"Supreme](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Supreme-Courts-decision-on-womens-employment-300x234.png?resize=536%2C418&ssl=1\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Source<\/strong>: The post Supreme Court’s decision on women’s employment has been created, based on the article \u201cEnding discrimination: Workplaces must ensure fair treatment of women employees<\/strong>\u201d published in \u201cThe Hindu\u201d<\/strong> on 22nd February 2024.<\/p>\n UPSC Syllabus Topic:<\/strong> GS Paper 2-governance-mechanisms, laws, institutions and bodies constituted for the protection and betterment of vulnerable sections.<\/p>\n News<\/strong>: The article discusses a Supreme Court of India ruling that it’s unconstitutional to fire women for getting married. Supreme Court\u2019s decision on women\u2019s employment<\/strong><\/p>\n Personal Questions in Interviews: <\/strong>Women often face uncomfortable personal questions about their marriage and motherhood plans during job interviews.<\/p>\n Low Workforce Participation: <\/strong>Data shows that only 19.9% of women in India participate in the workforce, highlighting a significant gender gap in employment.<\/p>\n Education Barriers: <\/strong>Many girls, especially among the poor, drop out of school due to various reasons, ranging from economic challenges to lack of proper facilities like toilets.<\/p>\n Restrictive Social Norms<\/strong>: Women are often bound by societal and cultural expectations, which limit their opportunities and advancement in the workforce.<\/p>\n Unequal Domestic Responsibilities:<\/strong> The UN\u2019s Gender Snapshot 2023<\/strong> indicates that women are expected to undertake a disproportionate amount of housework and caregiving duties compared to men.<\/p>\n Ruling on Marriage and Employment:<\/strong> The Supreme Court of India ruled that terminating women’s employment for getting married is unconstitutional.<\/p>\n Case Example – Selina John:<\/strong> This decision came from the case of Selina John, a former lieutenant in the Military Nursing Service, who was discharged in 1988 for getting married.<\/p>\n Compensation Ordered:<\/strong> The Court directed the Indian Government to pay Ms. John \u20b960 lakh in compensation.<\/p>\n Promotes Equal Treatment: <\/strong>The Supreme Court’s decision against penalizing women for marriage supports equal treatment in employment.<\/p>\n Encourages Women’s Participation:<\/strong> It may encourage more women to join and stay in the workforce, knowing their marital status won’t affect their employment.<\/p>\n Supports Broader Gender Parity Efforts: <\/strong>This decision aligns with efforts to achieve gender parity in areas like the military, where women recently gained the right to permanent commission.<\/p>\n Challenges Patriarchal Norms<\/strong>: It challenges patriarchal norms and societal expectations that restrict women’s professional opportunities.<\/p>\n <\/p>\nWhat challenges do women face in the civilian workforce?<\/strong><\/h2>\n
What was the Supreme Court’s decision on women’s employment?<\/strong><\/h2>\n
How does this affect gender equality?<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Read More UPSC Topics-<\/strong><\/h2>\n