{"id":300570,"date":"2024-06-17T19:36:09","date_gmt":"2024-06-17T14:06:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/?p=300570"},"modified":"2024-06-18T12:28:18","modified_gmt":"2024-06-18T06:58:18","slug":"contradictory-approach-of-the-madhya-pradesh-high-court-on-inter-faith-marriage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/contradictory-approach-of-the-madhya-pradesh-high-court-on-inter-faith-marriage\/","title":{"rendered":"Contradictory approach of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on inter-faith marriage"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-300703 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Contradictory-approach-of-the-Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court-on-inter-faith-marriage.png?resize=704%2C469&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"Contradictory approach of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on inter-faith marriage\" width=\"704\" height=\"469\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Contradictory-approach-of-the-Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court-on-inter-faith-marriage.png?resize=300%2C200&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Contradictory-approach-of-the-Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court-on-inter-faith-marriage.png?resize=1024%2C682&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Contradictory-approach-of-the-Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court-on-inter-faith-marriage.png?resize=768%2C512&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Contradictory-approach-of-the-Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court-on-inter-faith-marriage.png?w=1280&amp;ssl=1 1280w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 704px) 100vw, 704px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Source<\/span><\/b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">: The post Contradictory approach of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on inter-faith marriage has been created, based on the article \u201c<\/span><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">High Court\u2019s take on Marriage Act, an erosion of rights<\/span><\/b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u201d published in \u201c<\/span><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">The Hindu<\/span><\/b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u201d on 17th June 2024<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;134233117&quot;:false,&quot;134233118&quot;:false,&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335551550&quot;:0,&quot;335551620&quot;:0,&quot;335559738&quot;:240,&quot;335559739&quot;:240,&quot;335559740&quot;:279}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">UPSC Syllabus Topic: <\/span><\/b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">GS Paper 1- Society \u2013 Salient Features<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;134233117&quot;:false,&quot;134233118&quot;:false,&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335551550&quot;:0,&quot;335551620&quot;:0,&quot;335559738&quot;:225,&quot;335559739&quot;:225,&quot;335559740&quot;:279}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Context<\/span><\/b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">: The article discusses a problematic order from the Madhya Pradesh High Court. This order misinterprets the law on inter-faith marriages, questioning the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The court denied police protection to an unmarried Hindu-Muslim couple, contrary to established legal principle. <strong>Contradictory approach of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on inter-faith marriage<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">For detailed information on <\/span><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Impact of misinterpretation of the Special Marriage Act<\/span><\/b> <a href=\"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/impact-of-misinterpretation-of-the-special-marriage-act-sma\/#:~:text=It%20might%20also%20slow%20down,the%20intention%20of%20the%20SMA.\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">read this article here<\/span><\/a><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;134233117&quot;:false,&quot;134233118&quot;:false,&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335551550&quot;:0,&quot;335551620&quot;:0,&quot;335559738&quot;:225,&quot;335559739&quot;:225,&quot;335559740&quot;:279}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">What is the Madhya Pradesh High Court order on an inter-faith marriage?<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: var(--list--font-family); background-color: var(--global--color-background); color: var(--global--color-primary); font-size: var(--global--font-size-base);\">1. The Madhya Pradesh High Court questioned the validity of an inter-faith marriage between a Hindu girl and a Muslim boy under the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The court denied police protection to the unmarried couple.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: var(--list--font-family); background-color: var(--global--color-background); color: var(--global--color-primary); font-size: var(--global--font-size-base);\">2. The decision reversed gains in the right to choose a partner. It ignored the main objectives of the Special Marriage Act, which aims to provide a legal way for inter-faith marriages.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: var(--list--font-family); background-color: var(--global--color-background); color: var(--global--color-primary); font-size: var(--global--font-size-base);\">3. The decision neglected the couple&#8217;s right to protection under Article 21 of the Constitution.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">What contradicts the Madhya Pradesh High Court&#8217;s approach?<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: var(--list--font-family); background-color: var(--global--color-background); color: var(--global--color-primary); font-size: var(--global--font-size-base);\">1. High Courts usually protect the rights of petitioners in inter-faith and inter-caste marriages under Article 226 of the Constitution. Even unmarried couples often receive protection due to societal threats.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: var(--list--font-family); background-color: var(--global--color-background); color: var(--global--color-primary); font-size: var(--global--font-size-base);\">2. In Shafin Jahan vs. Asokan K.M. (2018), the Supreme Court emphasized that marriage is a personal choice protected by privacy. Social approval is not required for recognizing such decisions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: var(--list--font-family); background-color: var(--global--color-background); color: var(--global--color-primary); font-size: var(--global--font-size-base);\">3. The Madras High Court granted police protection to a lesbian couple, recognizing the dangers they faced.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">4. The Punjab and Haryana High Court protected a live-in couple, emphasizing their fundamental rights under Article 21, not the legality of their relationship.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;134233117&quot;:false,&quot;134233118&quot;:false,&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335551550&quot;:0,&quot;335551620&quot;:0,&quot;335559738&quot;:240,&quot;335559739&quot;:240,&quot;335559740&quot;:279}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">5.The Madhya Pradesh High Court used a Supreme Court case on property succession, which was irrelevant to the issue of marriage validity or police protection.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;134233117&quot;:false,&quot;134233118&quot;:false,&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335551550&quot;:0,&quot;335551620&quot;:0,&quot;335559738&quot;:240,&quot;335559739&quot;:240,&quot;335559740&quot;:279}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">How does the order affect the Special Marriage Act?<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p>1.<b style=\"font-family: var(--list--font-family); background-color: var(--global--color-background); color: var(--global--color-primary); font-size: var(--global--font-size-base);\"><span data-contrast=\"auto\"> Misinterprets Section 4<\/span><\/b><span style=\"font-family: var(--list--font-family); background-color: var(--global--color-background); color: var(--global--color-primary); font-size: var(--global--font-size-base);\" data-contrast=\"auto\">: The court wrongly applied Section 4, which only prohibits marriages within certain degrees of relationship.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>2.<b style=\"font-family: var(--list--font-family); background-color: var(--global--color-background); color: var(--global--color-primary); font-size: var(--global--font-size-base);\"><span data-contrast=\"auto\"> Uses Irrelevant Precedent<\/span><\/b><span style=\"font-family: var(--list--font-family); background-color: var(--global--color-background); color: var(--global--color-primary); font-size: var(--global--font-size-base);\" data-contrast=\"auto\">: The court referenced the Mohammed Salim vs. Shamsudeen case, which deals with property succession under Mohammedan Laws, not inter-faith marriage validity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Why is this order significant in today&#8217;s context?<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p>1. <b style=\"font-family: var(--list--font-family); background-color: var(--global--color-background); color: var(--global--color-primary); font-size: var(--global--font-size-base);\"><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Vigilantism Threat:<\/span><\/b><span style=\"font-family: var(--list--font-family); background-color: var(--global--color-background); color: var(--global--color-primary); font-size: var(--global--font-size-base);\" data-contrast=\"auto\"> The order is significant due to the current threat of vigilantism against inter-faith and inter-caste marriages.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>2.<b style=\"font-family: var(--list--font-family); background-color: var(--global--color-background); color: var(--global--color-primary); font-size: var(--global--font-size-base);\"><span data-contrast=\"auto\"> Ignoring Constitutional Morality:<\/span><\/b><span style=\"font-family: var(--list--font-family); background-color: var(--global--color-background); color: var(--global--color-primary); font-size: var(--global--font-size-base);\" data-contrast=\"auto\"> The &#8220;love jihad&#8221; conspiracy and right-wing propaganda challenge constitutional morality.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>3. <b style=\"font-family: var(--list--font-family); background-color: var(--global--color-background); color: var(--global--color-primary); font-size: var(--global--font-size-base);\"><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Pending Reforms:<\/span><\/b><span style=\"font-family: var(--list--font-family); background-color: var(--global--color-background); color: var(--global--color-primary); font-size: var(--global--font-size-base);\" data-contrast=\"auto\"> There are ongoing petitions in the Supreme Court challenging certain provisions of the Special Marriage Act.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Question for practice:<\/span><\/b><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;134233117&quot;:false,&quot;134233118&quot;:false,&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335551550&quot;:0,&quot;335551620&quot;:0,&quot;335559738&quot;:240,&quot;335559739&quot;:240,&quot;335559740&quot;:279}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Discuss the implications of the Madhya Pradesh High Court&#8217;s order on inter-faith marriages under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, focusing on its interpretation of legal protections, societal implications, and its alignment with constitutional principles.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;134233117&quot;:false,&quot;134233118&quot;:false,&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335551550&quot;:0,&quot;335551620&quot;:0,&quot;335559738&quot;:240,&quot;335559739&quot;:240,&quot;335559740&quot;:279}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Source: The post Contradictory approach of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on inter-faith marriage has been created, based on the article \u201cHigh Court\u2019s take on Marriage Act, an erosion of rights\u201d published in \u201cThe Hindu\u201d on 17th June 2024\u00a0 UPSC Syllabus Topic: GS Paper 1- Society \u2013 Salient Features\u00a0 Context: The article discusses a problematic&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/contradictory-approach-of-the-madhya-pradesh-high-court-on-inter-faith-marriage\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Contradictory approach of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on inter-faith marriage<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10357,"featured_media":300703,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1230],"tags":[212,225,10498],"class_list":["post-300570","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-9-pm-daily-articles","tag-gs-paper-2","tag-polity","tag-the-hindu","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Contradictory-approach-of-the-Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court-on-inter-faith-marriage.png?fit=1280%2C853&ssl=1","views":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/300570","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10357"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=300570"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/300570\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/300703"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=300570"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=300570"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=300570"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}