{"id":310255,"date":"2024-09-14T18:48:54","date_gmt":"2024-09-14T13:18:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/?p=310255"},"modified":"2024-09-16T10:47:22","modified_gmt":"2024-09-16T05:17:22","slug":"judicial-view-on-arvind-kejriwals-arrest","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/judicial-view-on-arvind-kejriwals-arrest\/","title":{"rendered":"Judicial view on Arvind Kejriwal\u2019s arrest"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Source<\/strong>: The post judicial view on Arvind Kejriwal\u2019s arrest has been created, based on the article \u201c<strong>Arvind Kejriwal\u2019s bail: From Supreme Court, a limited relief<\/strong>\u201d published in \u201c<strong>Indian Express<\/strong>\u201d on 14th September 2024<\/p>\n<p><strong>UPSC Syllabus Topic<\/strong>: GS Paper 2- judiciary<\/p>\n<p><strong>Context<\/strong>: The article discusses Justice Ujjal Bhuyan&#8217;s judgment granting bail to Arvind Kejriwal and criticizing the CBI&#8217;s illegal arrest. It highlights judicial reluctance to defend civil rights, procedural misuse, and the need for clearer self-incrimination protections under Article 20(3).<\/p>\n<p>For detailed information on <strong>The Need for a Bail Law<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/the-need-for-a-bail-law\/\">read this article here<\/a><\/p>\n<h2><strong>What is the Judicial view on Arvind Kejriwal\u2019s arrest?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li><strong> Justice Ujjal Bhuyan<\/strong>: Found Kejriwal\u2019s arrest by the CBI illegal, stating it aimed to prevent his bail in the Enforcement Directorate (ED) case. He criticized the CBI for using procedural technicalities as punishment.<\/li>\n<li><strong> Justice Surya Kant<\/strong>: Agreed that Kejriwal should be granted bail but accepted the CBI&#8217;s reasons for his arrest without deeper scrutiny.<\/li>\n<li><strong> CBI&#8217;s Justification<\/strong>: The CBI claimed Kejriwal\u2019s arrest was due to his \u201cevasive replies\u201d and lack of cooperation. Justice Bhuyan dismissed this reasoning, emphasizing that such grounds violate Article 20(3) on self-incrimination rights.<\/li>\n<li><strong> Delhi High Court<\/strong>: Criticized by Justice Bhuyan for unnecessarily directing Kejriwal to seek bail from the trial court again, despite hearing detailed arguments earlier.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2><strong>What Broader Issues Does the Judgment Highlight?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li><strong> Denial of Bail in High-Profile Cases<\/strong>: Courts tend to deny bail in high-profile cases without legal justification. Justice Bhuyan highlighted this problem, urging courts to protect personal liberty.<\/li>\n<li><strong> Right Against Self-Incrimination<\/strong>: The judgment questions the limited interpretation of Article 20(3) in the <em>Kathi Kalu Oghad<\/em> case (1961), which restricted self-incrimination rights during pre-trial investigations.<\/li>\n<li><strong> Judiciary\u2019s Reluctance to Challenge the Government<\/strong>: Justice Bhuyan pointed out a growing trend where courts, especially in high-profile cases, avoid challenging the government, potentially compromising civil rights.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Question for practice:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Examine how Justice Ujjal Bhuyan&#8217;s judgment on Arvind Kejriwal&#8217;s arrest addresses the misuse of procedural technicalities and the right against self-incrimination under Article 20(3).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Source: The post judicial view on Arvind Kejriwal\u2019s arrest has been created, based on the article \u201cArvind Kejriwal\u2019s bail: From Supreme Court, a limited relief\u201d published in \u201cIndian Express\u201d on 14th September 2024 UPSC Syllabus Topic: GS Paper 2- judiciary Context: The article discusses Justice Ujjal Bhuyan&#8217;s judgment granting bail to Arvind Kejriwal and criticizing&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/judicial-view-on-arvind-kejriwals-arrest\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Judicial view on Arvind Kejriwal\u2019s arrest<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10320,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1230,1234],"tags":[212,10500,225],"class_list":["post-310255","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-9-pm-daily-articles","category-polity-current-affairs","tag-gs-paper-2","tag-indian-express","tag-polity","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","views":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310255","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10320"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=310255"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310255\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=310255"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=310255"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=310255"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}