{"id":324067,"date":"2025-01-21T18:11:45","date_gmt":"2025-01-21T12:41:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/?p=324067"},"modified":"2025-01-21T18:11:45","modified_gmt":"2025-01-21T12:41:45","slug":"challenges-in-death-penalty-and-sentencing-decisions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/challenges-in-death-penalty-and-sentencing-decisions\/","title":{"rendered":"Challenges in Death Penalty and Sentencing Decisions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Source<\/strong>: The post Challenges in Death Penalty and Sentencing Decisions has been created, based on the article \u201c<strong>Mitigating circumstances: Why RG Kar rape case convict was not given death penalty<\/strong>\u201d published in \u201c<strong>Indian Express<\/strong>\u201d on 21st January 2025<\/p>\n<p><strong>UPSC Syllabus Topic:<\/strong> GS Paper <strong>2<\/strong> \u2013 Governance \u2013 Criminal Justice System in India<\/p>\n<p><strong>Context<\/strong>: The article discusses the RG Kar rape case verdict, life imprisonment for Sanjoy Roy, and debates on imposing the death penalty. It explains the &#8220;rarest of rare&#8221; doctrine, factors influencing sentencing, and challenges in ensuring fair hearings for mitigating circumstances.<\/p>\n<p>For detailed information on <strong>Execution of death penalty in India <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/execution-of-death-penalty-in-india\/\">read this article here<\/a><\/p>\n<h2><strong>What is the &#8220;Rarest of Rare&#8221; Doctrine?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li>The Supreme Court in <em>Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980)<\/em> upheld the death penalty but restricted it to \u201crarest of rare\u201d cases.<\/li>\n<li>Courts must assess <strong>aggravating circumstances<\/strong> (e.g., extreme brutality, premeditation) and <strong>mitigating circumstances<\/strong> (e.g., emotional disturbance, potential for reform) before imposing death.<\/li>\n<li>The \u201crarest of rare\u201d doctrine has evolved to focus on both the crime and the convict. Initially, decisions like <em>Machhi Singh (1983)<\/em> emphasized shocking society&#8217;s conscience. Later cases, such as <em>Santosh Bariyar (2009)<\/em>, highlighted reform potential.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>For detailed information on <strong>Death penalty: Deciding the rarest of the rare<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/death-penalty-deciding-the-rarest-of-the-rare\/\">read this article here<\/a><\/p>\n<h2><strong>What Are Aggravating and Mitigating Circumstances?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li><strong> Aggravating Circumstances<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ul>\n<li>Crimes involving <strong>extreme brutality<\/strong> or <strong>pre-planned acts<\/strong>, as in <em>Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab (1983)<\/em>.<\/li>\n<li>Murder of public servants, such as police officers, during duty.<\/li>\n<li>Acts showing <strong>exceptional depravity<\/strong>, shocking society&#8217;s conscience.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li><strong> Mitigating Circumstances<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ul>\n<li><strong> Emotional or mental disturbance<\/strong> during the crime (<em>Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab<\/em>).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Age<\/strong>: Young (below 30) or old convicts (<em>Ramnaresh v. State of Chhattisgarh, 2012<\/em>).<\/li>\n<li>Potential for <strong>reformation<\/strong>: Must be proven irredeemable (<em>Santosh Bariyar v. State of Maharashtra, 2009<\/em>).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><strong>What are current challenges in death penalty cases?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li><strong> Subjective Application of the \u201cRarest of Rare\u201d Doctrine:<\/strong> In <em>Shankar Kisanrao Khade v. State of Maharashtra (2013)<\/em>, the Supreme Court noted inconsistent sentencing in similar cases. Some convicts received the death penalty, while others were spared, highlighting <strong>judge-centric outcomes.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong> Imbalance Between Aggravating and Mitigating Factors:<\/strong> The SC, in suo motu proceedings (2022), noted that aggravating factors are part of the case record, but mitigating factors are introduced only after conviction. This creates a \u201c<strong>hopeless disadvantage\u201d for the convict.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong> Inadequate Sentencing Hearings:<\/strong> The SC in <em>Dattaraya v. State of Maharashtra (2020)<\/em> commuted a death sentence to life imprisonment because the convict was denied a \u201creal, effective and meaningful hearing\u201d during sentencing.<\/li>\n<li><strong> Limited Focus on Reform:<\/strong> In <em>Santosh Bariyar v. State of Maharashtra (2009)<\/em>, the SC emphasized that the prosecution must provide clear evidence proving the impossibility of reform. Lack of such evidence undermines objectivity in sentencing.<\/li>\n<li><strong> Overemphasis on Shocking Society\u2019s Conscience:<\/strong> In <em>Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab (1983)<\/em>, the SC allowed death sentences in cases where the &#8220;collective conscience&#8221; of society is shocked. The Law Commission later criticized this approach for neglecting the convict&#8217;s circumstances.<\/li>\n<li><strong> Inconsistent Use of Age as a Mitigating Factor:<\/strong> The SC in cases like <em>Ramnaresh v. State of Chhattisgarh (2012)<\/em> considered youth (below 30) a reason for leniency. However, in <em>Shankar Khade<\/em>, the SC found age inconsistently applied across similar cases.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Question for practice:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Examine the challenges associated with ensuring fair sentencing hearings in death penalty cases.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Source: The post Challenges in Death Penalty and Sentencing Decisions has been created, based on the article \u201cMitigating circumstances: Why RG Kar rape case convict was not given death penalty\u201d published in \u201cIndian Express\u201d on 21st January 2025 UPSC Syllabus Topic: GS Paper 2 \u2013 Governance \u2013 Criminal Justice System in India Context: The article&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/challenges-in-death-penalty-and-sentencing-decisions\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Challenges in Death Penalty and Sentencing Decisions<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10320,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1230],"tags":[300,212,10500],"class_list":["post-324067","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-9-pm-daily-articles","tag-governance","tag-gs-paper-2","tag-indian-express","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","views":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/324067","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10320"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=324067"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/324067\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=324067"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=324067"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=324067"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}