{"id":333082,"date":"2025-04-16T20:37:08","date_gmt":"2025-04-16T15:07:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/?p=333082"},"modified":"2025-04-17T10:33:50","modified_gmt":"2025-04-17T05:03:50","slug":"supreme-court-limits-governor-and-president-assent-powers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/supreme-court-limits-governor-and-president-assent-powers\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court limits Governor and President assent powers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Source<\/strong>: The post Supreme Court limits Governor and President assent powers has been created, based on the article \u201c<strong>A proclamation of democracy in legislative process<\/strong>\u201d published in \u201c<strong>The Hindu<\/strong>\u201d on 16 April 2025. <strong>Supreme Court limits Governor and President assent powers.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-333193 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Supreme-Court-limits-Governor-and-President-assent-powers.png?resize=525%2C348&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"Supreme Court limits Governor and President assent powers\" width=\"525\" height=\"348\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Supreme-Court-limits-Governor-and-President-assent-powers.png?resize=300%2C199&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Supreme-Court-limits-Governor-and-President-assent-powers.png?resize=1024%2C680&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Supreme-Court-limits-Governor-and-President-assent-powers.png?resize=768%2C510&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Supreme-Court-limits-Governor-and-President-assent-powers.png?w=1280&amp;ssl=1 1280w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>UPSC Syllabus Topic:<\/strong> GS Paper2-Polity-Appointment to various Constitutional posts, powers, functions and responsibilities of various Constitutional Bodies.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Context<\/strong>: The Supreme Court\u2019s recent judgment in <em>State of Tamil Nadu vs Governor of Tamil Nadu<\/em> marks a <strong>historic intervention in legislative processes<\/strong>. By invoking <strong>Article 142<\/strong>, the Court imposed <strong>time limits<\/strong> on gubernatorial and presidential assent to State Bills. This challenges long-standing assumptions about <strong>discretionary powers<\/strong> and affirms <strong>legislative supremacy<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>For detailed information on <strong>Supreme Court defines limits of Governor<\/strong><strong>\u2019<\/strong><strong>s powers<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/supreme-court-defines-limits-of-governors-powers\/\">read this article here<\/a><\/p>\n<h2><strong>How Did the Court Interpret the Constitution?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Articles 200 and 201<\/strong>: The Court clarified the roles of the <strong>Governor and President<\/strong> in the State legislative process. If a Bill is <strong>re-passed by the legislature<\/strong>, the <strong>Governor must assent<\/strong>. The <strong>President<\/strong> too must respond <strong>within a fixed time<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Use of Article 142<\/strong>: The Court used this provision to <strong>set deadlines<\/strong> for gubernatorial and presidential responses, introducing the idea of <strong>\u201c<\/strong><strong>deemed assent\u201d<\/strong> if no action is taken.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Judicial Realism<\/strong>: The Court adopted a <strong>modern and dynamic interpretation<\/strong> of the Constitution, similar to what it did in the <strong>Puttaswamy (2017)<\/strong> case on privacy.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Precedents and Principles<\/strong>: It relied on <strong>Shamsher Singh<\/strong> to restrict discretionary powers and <strong>B.K. Pavitra (2019)<\/strong>to promote <strong>constitutional accountability<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2><strong>Constitutional Issues Addressed<\/strong><\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li><strong> Discretionary Limits<\/strong>: The judgment made it clear that <strong>withholding assent must be justified<\/strong>, not arbitrary.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Deemed Assent Mechanism<\/strong>: It introduced a provision where <strong>assent is assumed<\/strong> if a decision is not made within the time limit.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Filling Constitutional Gaps<\/strong>: Using <strong>Article 142<\/strong>, the Court addressed the <strong>lack of timelines<\/strong> and ensured that legislative processes <strong>are not blocked<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li><strong> Use of Precedents<\/strong>: <strong>Shamsher Singh<\/strong> and <strong>B.K. Pavitra<\/strong> were central in affirming the <strong>binding nature of cabinet decisions<\/strong> and democratic values.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2><strong>The Supreme Court<\/strong><strong>\u2019<\/strong><strong>s Judgment Considered Historic and Controversial<\/strong><\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Historic Nature<\/strong>: The judgment is significant because it <strong>limits the traditional discretionary powers<\/strong> of the Governor and the President. It ensures that the <strong>will of the legislature<\/strong> is not stalled indefinitely.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Controversial Aspect<\/strong>: The <strong>Governor of Kerala criticised<\/strong> the ruling, calling it <strong>judicial overreach<\/strong>. He claimed that it <strong>encroaches on Parliament&#8217;s authority<\/strong> and brings the <strong>President under judicial review<\/strong>, which he believes exceeds the Court\u2019s jurisdiction.<\/li>\n<li><strong> Examples and Precedents<\/strong>: The Court cited the <strong>Shamsher Singh case (1974)<\/strong> to reinforce that <strong>Governors must act on Cabinet advice<\/strong>. It also referred to the <strong>Sarkaria Commission Report (1988)<\/strong>, which advised that <strong>policy differences with the Union are not valid grounds<\/strong> to withhold assent.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Impact on Governance<\/strong>: The ruling requires <strong>reasoned decisions<\/strong> when assent is withheld. It removes the <strong>perceived immunity<\/strong> of high constitutional offices, promoting <strong>accountability and transparency<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2><strong>Way Forward<\/strong><\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li><strong> Quicker Judgments<\/strong>: Courts should deliver <strong>shorter and timely verdicts<\/strong>, as seen in the <strong>UK Supreme Court<\/strong><strong>\u2019<\/strong><strong>s 24-page Brexit judgment (2019)<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Consistency in Hearing<\/strong>: <strong>Similar cases<\/strong> should be <strong>clubbed together<\/strong> and heard by the <strong>same Bench<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Better Internal Coordination<\/strong>: The judiciary should improve <strong>internal management<\/strong> to ensure <strong>clarity, predictability, and fairness<\/strong> in constitutional cases.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Conclusion<\/strong>: The judgment redefines <strong>executive accountability<\/strong> in the legislative process. It upholds <strong>democratic principles<\/strong> by limiting <strong>arbitrary delay<\/strong> and emphasizes that <strong>constitutional offices are not above scrutiny<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Question for practice:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Examine how the Supreme Court\u2019s recent judgment in the State of Tamil Nadu vs Governor of Tamil Nadu redefines the limits of gubernatorial and presidential discretion in the legislative process.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Source: The post Supreme Court limits Governor and President assent powers has been created, based on the article \u201cA proclamation of democracy in legislative process\u201d published in \u201cThe Hindu\u201d on 16 April 2025. Supreme Court limits Governor and President assent powers. UPSC Syllabus Topic: GS Paper2-Polity-Appointment to various Constitutional posts, powers, functions and responsibilities of&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/supreme-court-limits-governor-and-president-assent-powers\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Supreme Court limits Governor and President assent powers<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10320,"featured_media":333193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1230],"tags":[212,225,10498],"class_list":["post-333082","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-9-pm-daily-articles","tag-gs-paper-2","tag-polity","tag-the-hindu","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Supreme-Court-limits-Governor-and-President-assent-powers.png?fit=1280%2C850&ssl=1","views":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/333082","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10320"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=333082"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/333082\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/333193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=333082"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=333082"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=333082"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}