{"id":97382,"date":"2021-03-23T21:24:44","date_gmt":"2021-03-23T15:54:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.forumias.com\/?p=97382"},"modified":"2021-03-23T21:25:50","modified_gmt":"2021-03-23T15:55:50","slug":"shortcomings-of-the-in-house-inquiry-procedure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/shortcomings-of-the-in-house-inquiry-procedure\/","title":{"rendered":"Shortcomings of the \u2018In House inquiry Procedure\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><b>Synopsis<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">: The shortcomings of the \u2018in house inquiry procedure\u2019 of the Supreme Court has again come to the limelight. This time over the appointment of the future CJI itself. The upcoming CJI is facing serious allegations of misconduct, but there is no clarity of &#8216;In House inquiry Procedure&#8217; in the concerned matter.<\/span><\/p>\n<h5><b>Background<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">:<\/span><\/h5>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The upcoming CJI will assume office as the 48th CJI (Chief Justice of India) on 24th April 2021.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This would make him master of the roster and give him the power to constitute benches in every case of the Supreme court. This includes the creation of inquiry committees for the In House inquiry Procedure also.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Thus allowing him to constitute a bench in his own case as well. This will give rise to the development of bias and undermine judicial impartiality.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>What are the allegations?\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The current CM of Andhra Pradesh has accused the upcoming CJI and one other Judge of abusing their judicial position. The CM also wrote a letter to the present CJI in this regard in October 2020.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The allegation related to the creation of favourable benches to support the opposition party in Andhra Pradesh.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In 2017 as well, a senior Supreme Court judge had addressed the upcoming CJI in the same issue. He also wrote a letter to the then CJI.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Nonetheless, the issue has certainly highlighted the shortcomings of the In House inquiry procedure of the Supreme Court.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h5><b>In House inquiry Procedure:<\/b><\/h5>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It was formulated by the higher judiciary in 1997. It helps in determining whether a judge has acted against accepted values of judicial life or not.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Under this, a compliant of misconduct may be filed by any person to CJI or the President of India.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The CJI will then examine the complaint, he\/she may constitute a 3 member committee for inquiry or dispose of the complaint as per his discretion.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h5><b>Shortcomings of the \u2018In House inquiry Procedure\u2019:<\/b><\/h5>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">There are <\/span><b>no timelines for the completion<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> of the inquiry. So the inquiry time is getting unnecessary delays.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The procedure <\/span><b>gives wide discretionary powers to CJI. <\/b>This<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> can breed favouritism in Judiciary.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Further, the <\/span><b>procedure doesn\u2019t forbid the CJI from being part of his\/her own complaint<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> of misconduct. Thereby <strong>undermining the principle of natural justice<\/strong>.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">There is <\/span><b>no need to disclose the report of the inquiry into the public domain<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> or to the complainant. This is against transparency in the Judiciary.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h5><b>Suggestions to improve the In House inquiry procedure<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">:<\/span><\/h5>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As the issue revolves around high constitutional offices, the allegations deserve a<\/span><b> thorough, expeditious and transparent inquiry.<\/b><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Post inquiry a <\/span><b>remedial measure<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> should be taken like:<\/span>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Inducing the concerned judges to resign if he is guilty of misconduct. Further initiation of removal proceedings can also be started if judges don\u2019t honour the resignation request.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><b>Citizens should be informed<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> regarding the inquiry committees outcomes. This would strengthen trust in the functioning of the judiciary.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Bar Council of India has failed to demand greater transparency in the inquiry process. Now, the masses are the last hope to reform the self-serving and non-transparent judicial setup.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Source<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">: <a href=\"https:\/\/epaper.thehindu.com\/Home\/ShareArticle?OrgId=GC48DEHAI.1&amp;imageview=0\">The Hindu<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Synopsis: The shortcomings of the \u2018in house inquiry procedure\u2019 of the Supreme Court has again come to the limelight. This time over the appointment of the future CJI itself. The upcoming CJI is facing serious allegations of misconduct, but there is no clarity of &#8216;In House inquiry Procedure&#8217; in the concerned matter. Background: The upcoming&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/shortcomings-of-the-in-house-inquiry-procedure\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Shortcomings of the \u2018In House inquiry Procedure\u2019<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10322,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1230,9],"tags":[1337],"class_list":["post-97382","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-9-pm-daily-articles","category-public","tag-po_2","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","views":{"total":0,"cached_at":1700790867,"cached_date":1704902114},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97382","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10322"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=97382"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97382\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=97382"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=97382"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=97382"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}