With reference to the economy during the
British rule in India, consider the following
statements:
1. The English East India Company came
to India in the search of raw material to
feed industries in England.
2. The latter half of the nineteenth century
witnessed commercialization of Indian
agriculture.a, b, both correct , none ?
B
They came as traders. To earn profit.
COmmercialisation yes as someone mentioned above indigo
Consider the following statements with reference to Fixed-term employment (FTE): 1. Fixed-term employment (FTE) is a contract in which a company hires an employee for a specific period of time. 2. An FTE worker will be entitled to all statutory benefits like a permanent worker. 3. The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 allow converting permanent jobs into fixed-term contracts.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 1 and 2 only (c) 2 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3
IN this is the statement 3 correct , I believe its the opposite naa ??
i too feel its B.
This labour code things is tricky honestly. Need to brush up.
C ?
Correct as per answer key also.
Although I dont agree with the answer completely, because those registered in voter's list can be of just 18 years of age also, but 18 year old teenager can not contest in municipal elections. So, technically this seems wrong to me.
Hence, I have this doubt.
choose the best amongst the given options
can someone tell if the following statements are true or any correction is required
office of chairperson election
1) for PRI
determined by manner state by law
plus 1/3rd reserve for women + sc/st reserve as per proportion of the sc/st population to total state population
2) Muncipality
determined by state by law for sc/st/women
PRI chairperson only at the village level. rest two block and district it is indirect election.
for village level state gets to decide
The Constitution states that the laws made by the Parliament are applicable only within the territory of India.
Acc to forum open test this statement is wrong.
But isnt the above statement same as the below statement.
"Laws made by Parliament may extend throughout or in any part of the territory of India and those made by State Legislatures may generally apply only within the terrirory of the State concerned. Hence, variations are likely to exist from State to State in provisions of law relating to matters falling in the State and Concurrent Lists."
May be if the option had been framed like the Parliament cant make laws with extra terrirtorial jurisdction , then it would have been false.
Palas gave patronage to Vaishnavism and made donations to the brahmanas. Another poorly framed option. Every other ruler patronised multiple faiths and gave grants , the option should be ....Also Gave....
agree with the palas statement.
However, the parliament one- last year NIA allowed to have jurisdiction over foreign terrorist etc.
This is what i thought during the exam
i marked C.
Please help me find loophole in my thought process
if external borowwing is promoted wont it further increase demand of dollar leading to further depreciation of ruppee ? I get that it would get forex reserves.
The reason why 2nd statement is correct because it ensures that money in borrowed in ruppe denominated debt and not dollar. Statement 3 however, does the exact opposite of statement 2.
Please help
of the little experience i have at this exam, i can assure you that if one doens't commit blunders in attempting questions from standard sources in the exam hall he/she would sail through.
questions like omkareshwar, ghantnasthal etc are no doubt an added advantage but trust me even if they dont strike you in the exam hall you can still get through with accumulated knowledge you have gathered over the time.
have faith on your preparation and knowledge base.
