@Yes_I_am_inpaper went fine,
In paper 1, have written quality answers on 10 markers except only facial reconstruction there i might get 4 or 5, rest were comprehensive.
20 markers - race one was above average with standard answer unesco ashley montangu classification non morphological criteria debunking.
Turner geertz was good with corelation comparision and criticism.
Indigenous community with globalization was not that great answer wrote pointwise but could not write more case studies and answer was more pointwise only in three parts acceptance assimilation and refusal and protest.
15 matkers religion apptoach mentioned all but criticism wrote only 3 points.
Polymorphism drew graph and compared both with examples like sca thalasemia etc
High altitude wrote good answer with oxygen dissociation curve and others eg eskimo sherpa etc.
Growth methods drew graphs and wrote advantage demerit
Applied genetics drew diagrams for vntr rflp gene mapping gemome etc.
Participant observation very less time remained so had to write wrote imp in fieldwork types of participation benefits limitation and malinowski.
Last time had 141, paper went slightly better than last time.
Hoping atleast 150 this time.
@Yes_I_am_inpaper 2 10 markers were good,
20 markers harappa have written drew diagrams of town planning,seals etc.
Village study was my best answer in paper mentioned 8 concepts plus studies year anthropologist etc.
Tribe and nation state gave indian examples and concepts such as ethnicity eminent domain different approaches.
15 markers non hindu on sc and constitutional safegaurd and tribal programs went fine.
Ngo case studies only 2 and rest pointwise.
Impact of industrialisation and impact of media not very strong case studies but wrote pointwise
Paper 2 i wrote theoretically strong points but case studies were repetitive and well known not very strong or in depth.
Last year had 138 this time fingers crossed
@Akkkuif you have written whats in the article correctly then it becomes immaterial but those who have written both number and substance and relevance of attorney general will score high in the question
In last 2 weeks i talked with@sat_009regarding anthropplogy though i didnt like some of his view point on answers especially in essay and anthropology but at no point he showed off or talked repetitively about marks as some othe people did, i dont know anything personal about him but he seemed to me genuine and motivating when i said i am not sure about anthropology paper 2 he said scoring in this paper is liberal in last three year dont worry, so he does not demotivate,
but after seeing all this i will definitely ask on telegram as he is not replying on chats on forum maybe he is really upset about messages he said last year he had less marks in gs hence focused more upon gs etc he never said ki result tough hoga etc but i am really in confusion that can anyone be believed in this age?
Anyway he has no such records which i am seeing of dawson omg people are to such level fraud how do they get gs 4 marks
We must not believe on anyone blindly and should not trust anyone@sat_009and@Charlie_Charliebut we must not cross the line too
