roger mathew does suggest the speaker’s certification isn’t totally immune, but courts will interfere only on a narrow “gross illegality” type standard. article 110(3) and article 122 make it tricky, yet the majority view seems to be that “final” doesn’t mean “beyond the constitution.” while reading on this, i got distracted by spammy redirects tohttps://playjackpotfishing.com/during an ecourts-related search, and it was annoying. another time a forum mirror loadedhttps://tongitsgogame.com/instead of the judgment text, which shows how messy tracking these cases online can get. overall, for upsc, it’s safest to frame it as reviewable but with a high threshold and still pending before a larger bench.
