Daily Quiz – UPSC Prelims Marathon: March 29

[WpProQuiz 86]


 

 

 


Comments

65 responses to “Daily Quiz – UPSC Prelims Marathon: March 29”

  1. Samarjyoti Thakuria Avatar
    Samarjyoti Thakuria

    4/5

  2. Ajay Sisodiya Avatar
    Ajay Sisodiya

    4 of 5 questions answered correctly

    Your time: 00:04:34

    You have reached 4 of 5 scores, (80%)

  3. suchak Avatar
    suchak

    Q.4 :- The Directive Principles help the courts in examining and determining the constitutional validity of a law. ?? it’s FR and not DPSP

  4. 5 of 5 questions answered correctly

    Your time: 00:00:59

    You have reached 5 of 5 scores, (100%)

    Average score 54.27%
    Your score 100%
    Thanks for attempting the Quiz.

  5. anonmyous Avatar
    anonmyous

    3/5

  6. 3/5

  7. CSE2017 aspirant (ABG) Avatar
    CSE2017 aspirant (ABG)

    yes – civil engineering 🙂 🙂

  8. Serene Buddha Avatar
    Serene Buddha

    i am science student and my blood boils 😀 when i see ambiguty in our laws!!
    i believe you also from engineering background, as i observe so many political qns are put forth by you are once occurred to me also and i read whole law to clear it, 🙁

  9. CSE2017 aspirant (ABG) Avatar
    CSE2017 aspirant (ABG)

    Hmm, that’s why Polity is difficult than Science – Ambiguity and Multiple interpretation !!!
    Thanks dude for such a lucid explanation !!!

  10. Serene Buddha Avatar
    Serene Buddha

    hi ABG, good one, i also thought this long ago, but i realized the answer after studying act.
    I will tell you my findings, how it was poorly drafted,
    it is widely accepted that, untouchability is social problem and is directed against certain community,
    Law should have mentioned that it is against that community and acts against them like denying access etc should be banned.
    problem is, enuf ambiguity is left and became lawyer paradise.
    ex: Suppose a person not from untouchable caste, but is denied entry due to mysterious reasons. this law is heavily unclear,
    what is recourse…and infact it is happened that courts denied this action as untouchability. 😀

  11. Private individuals can deny to render their service if they are not paid for their service. However, despite being paid if they are maintaining separate utensils to any customer because of his caste, birth etc then they will be considered as offender.

  12. PRAVEEN CHOUDHARY Avatar
    PRAVEEN CHOUDHARY

    Right under article 23(question 1)is very much available to aliens I think.its not for enemy aliens.
    Guys correct me if wrong.

  13. SkiRony Avatar
    SkiRony

    5/5…finallyyyyy

  14. Krishna Avatar
    Krishna

    3 of 5 questions answered correctly

    Your time: 00:06:00

    thnq forum ias team

  15. PRAVEEN CHOUDHARY Avatar
    PRAVEEN CHOUDHARY

    Same thought.infact very poorly worded question,also question no 2 is misleading

  16. Atulesh Jha Avatar
    Atulesh Jha

    Same issue….

  17. 5 of 5 questions answered correctly

    Your time: 00:01:50

    You have reached 5 of 5 scores, (100%)

  18. know_alak Avatar
    know_alak

    Question 2 has misleading language. Justice of liberty, equality and fraternity is not provided. It talks of Social Economic and Political Justice. I think the comma got replaced by of.

  19. Murinder Nodi Avatar
    Murinder Nodi

    Denying access to any shop, hotel or places of public entertainment.

    The above statement doesn’t give any basis of discrimination.It is just a general statement. So if you look at it from that angle then,it is false I think. If it mentions anything like CASTE as you said than it could be true.
    Mere koh nahi lagta ki meih exam meih ittna yaad rakh paunga, I will only resort to logic.

    And as someone has mentioned above on the basis of dress code is valid.

  20. The Common Man Avatar
    The Common Man

    ‘Don’t underestimate the power of a common man’ … ;D 🙂

  21. Shubham Avatar
    Shubham

    You are correct, grounds such as dress code etc are valid

  22. Atif Hussain Avatar
    Atif Hussain

    social boycott isn’t covered by the act

  23. Shubham Avatar
    Shubham

    In question 3 case 3 is wrong as denying access to shops hotels or public places not an offence but denying access based on certain grounds such as caste , religion etc. Offence and not on grounds such as dress code etc

  24. CSE2017 aspirant (ABG) Avatar
    CSE2017 aspirant (ABG)

    If a private individual denies service on ground of CASTE of the person, whereas he is giving service to other caste – while both of them have agreed to pay required FEES – then it is the question of CLEAR DISCRIMINATION.
    There should be CONTEXT of saying NO !!! And this CONTEXT and the related GROUND is judged by Courts !!!

  25. THOR nd MJOLNEER Avatar
    THOR nd MJOLNEER

    Lol.

    UPSC will not make such a typo, I m sure. 🙂

  26. Murinder Nodi Avatar
    Murinder Nodi

    I also have one doubt, what if these institutions such as hotels are owned by private individuals, can’t they deny to render their service to an individual. It is up to them, whom to give service and whom to not. What I remember is that private entities can say “no” in certain cases. So I ticked 3 as false.

  27. Murinder Nodi Avatar
    Murinder Nodi

    ** following** please upvote this comment if you find any answer.

  28. CSE2017 aspirant (ABG) Avatar
    CSE2017 aspirant (ABG)

    http://socialjustice.nic.in/writereaddata/UploadFile/arpcr08.pdf

    1.3 Main provisions of the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955, are as under:-
    (1) Sections 3 – 7A of the Act define the following as offences if committed on the
    ground of “untouchability”
    , and lay down punishment for them:
    (i) Prevention from entering public worship places, using sacred water resources
    (Section 3).
    (ii) Denial of access to any shop, public restaurant, hotel, public entertainment,
    cremation ground etc. (Section 4).
    (iii) Refusal of admission to any hospital, dispensary, educational institutions etc.
    (Section 5).
    (iv) Refusal to sell goods and render services (Section 6).
    (v) Molestation, causing injury, insult etc. (Section 7).
    (vi) Compelling a person on the ground of untouchability to do any scavenging or
    sweeping or to remove any carcass etc. (Section 7 A)

  29. agree

  30. Suprme Leader ON Kharai-Camel Avatar
    Suprme Leader ON Kharai-Camel

    dekhte hain….waise marks toh aweinn hai…its a Fun..sbhi baccho ke saath 1 platform par aana..!! 🙂

  31. Race 6. Avatar
    Race 6.

    4/5. The statement 2 is incrct due to the language of sentence justice of liberty equality and fraternity.

  32. tarun gogoi Avatar
    tarun gogoi

    question no. 2 ,statement 2 . their is a problem.

  33. IndianSuperhero Avatar
    IndianSuperhero

    nahi yaar,,,aaj ka 60 day ka marks dekh lena sacchai saamne aa jayegi..;D

  34. Suprme Leader ON Kharai-Camel Avatar
    Suprme Leader ON Kharai-Camel

    After hitting 5/5…youre no more a common man!! 🙂

  35. Tremendous improvement. Keep doing whatever you are doing for past few days 🙂

  36. Suprme Leader ON Kharai-Camel Avatar
    Suprme Leader ON Kharai-Camel

    Bhaaii….har platform par Solid performance…kya baat hain..!!

  37. I agree with you too. It cannot be ‘justice of’.

  38. CSE2017 aspirant (ABG) Avatar
    CSE2017 aspirant (ABG)

    hmm, but I think if such question comes in UPSC – we should not consider as TYPO !!! And if there is TYPO – then Engender and Endanger waala kaand hoga – results late nikalenge – Some MP will write a letter from our behalf 🙂

  39. Results
    3 of 5 questions answered correctly

    Your time: 00:02:43

    You have reached 3 of 5 scores, (60%)

  40. THOR nd MJOLNEER Avatar
    THOR nd MJOLNEER

    Definitely, the statement is not correct but is also not wrong.

    Why?

    My logic–> Preamble was based on the ‘Objectives Resolution’.
    It is talking about Objectives.

    Preamble has JUSTICE, LIBERTY, EQUALITY and FRATERNITY.

    It says Justice of Liberty –> We all know there is nothing as Justice of Liberty.

    Thus, It must be a typo.

    I should hence be considering it right and not wrong. though Justice of Liberty is not an objective and the statement is wrong.

    Yet, it is not wrong as it was a typo.

  41. Suprme Leader ON Kharai-Camel Avatar
    Suprme Leader ON Kharai-Camel

    4/5 in Polity…..big LOL….lolest!!

  42. Same mistake has been done by me …And it’s just a platform where we learn and correct our error so don’t feel bad ..

  43. THOR nd MJOLNEER Avatar
    THOR nd MJOLNEER

    Yo 🙂

  44. <3 KH <3 Avatar
    <3 KH <3

    3/5

  45. CSE2017 aspirant (ABG) Avatar
    CSE2017 aspirant (ABG)

    I have a question – If anyone is being denied access to any shop, hotel or places of public entertainment NOT because of reason on BIRTH in certain castes, but as a SOCIAL BOYCOTT of a individual due to some other reasons, will it still be an offence under the Protection of Civil Rights Act of 1955.

    This act defines civil rights as any right accruing to a person by reason of the abolition of untouchability by Article 17 of the Constitution.

    I know that Lakshmikanth mentiones this act as an offence, but I think statement needs to be connected with REASON of BIRTH in CERTAIN CASTE, without which it will not come under the ambit of the ACT.

    Please, if anyone has explanation related to it – do answer the query !!!

  46. 4/5

  47. The Common Man Avatar
    The Common Man

    Results
    5 of 5 questions answered correctly

    Your time: 00:03:28

    You have reached 5 of 5 scores, (100%)

  48. CSE2017 aspirant (ABG) Avatar
    CSE2017 aspirant (ABG)

    I feel it’s TYPO

  49. IndianSuperhero Avatar
    IndianSuperhero

    either sentence is incomplete or typo…

  50. CSE2017 aspirant (ABG) Avatar
    CSE2017 aspirant (ABG)

    Yes, I agree with you !!!

  51. CSE2017 aspirant (ABG) Avatar
    CSE2017 aspirant (ABG)

    How can 2nd question( 2nd statement) be correct – Justice of Liberty – it’s not an objective : I think this statement is wrong !!!!

  52. Hrangkekuala Avatar
    Hrangkekuala

    Second consecutive 5/5 LOL!!!

  53. Vib2017 Avatar
    Vib2017

    Daily Quiz: March 29
    Results
    3 of 5 questions answered correctly

    Your time: 00:05:11

  54. IndianSuperhero Avatar
    IndianSuperhero

    aaj form me aa gaye,,,,;D

  55. IndianSuperhero Avatar
    IndianSuperhero

    Results
    5 of 5 questions answered correctly

    Your time: 00:03:05

    You have reached 5 of 5 scores, (100%)

  56. THOR nd MJOLNEER Avatar
    THOR nd MJOLNEER

    Results
    5 of 5 questions answered correctly

    Your time: 00:03:10

  57. anand kumar Avatar
    anand kumar

    THANKS

  58. Mr.Maverick Avatar
    Mr.Maverick

    Daily Quiz: March 29
    Results
    5 of 5 questions answered correctly

    Your time: 00:02:20

  59. Arsenal Avatar
    Arsenal

    Nothing silly about it, it shows that you are sharp. A similar trick may be used by upsc and then you’ll be one of those who spot it and get it right. 🙂

  60. Arsenal Avatar
    Arsenal

    Please rectify Question two. If the statement is justice ‘of’ then answer should be only 1. If the statement is ‘justice, liberty etc’, then answer will be both one and two.

  61. 4/5

  62. Solitude Avatar
    Solitude

    5/5

  63. Arkhamasylum Avatar
    Arkhamasylum

    Q2 justice of liberty, equality and fraternity?

  64. Swift24 Avatar
    Swift24

    Thanks ForumIAS. And kindly correct the typo in 2nd statement of Q2, marked the wrong answer because of it. Silly Me 🙁

  65. 3/5…..my dooms day 🙁

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *