I guess they awarded 5 to avg answer 6 to good and 7 to best answer out of 10 . . In 15 marker same pattern was 5-6 , 8 -9 and 10 -11 . . Out of 20 could have been 10 , 12-14 and 14 -15 for best. . Seeing the scores of guys and difficulty level of paper. This could have been the marking scheme i guess
@sat_009which one?? I was not well versed with phenomenology
@sat_009yes. . But in short. . Focus on its impact on evolution of language, tool typology, migration, speech, co inhibiting.
@sat_009yess. . I was not knowing in detail about that. .thats why i left that question
@Valar_morghulis- which 3 u write?
@sat_009kk. . I tried the same. . Have written many current examples like reservation for son of soil in MP and Telangana in regionalism. . Have drawn the map
@sat_009yess. , done it in balanced in detail
@sat_009which 3 u wrote and how u wrote in paper 2 as well as 1 . . U seems to be expert in anthro. . Im just beginer
@sat_009i wrote these examples for current relevance
@sat_009u r invited to anthro page
@sat_009what was your gs score? U have realy studied welll this year
Wrote cyberdome on cybersecurity theme. . Just write types of vuknerability with no explaination, mentioned the points like rigitalisation of data, ipr strengthening, easy procedure, Mibistry of ayush, promotion of reseaech etc in traditional knowledge question but not used word TKDL,wrote weong about vishweswaraiya 's work, had stopped reading recent current affair in august itself so was little aware of UAPA but still write general answer,rest of my questions are good. .. My paper 3 story which i found difficult
After seeing the discussion of the questions here i still not able to decipher whether i have written good answers or not. People still want IBC format or some structure which i have nt maintained in many questions. . Also i have written mix of point format and para format which may award me less marks as many claimed that examiners just see the heading and subheading and not the entire answer. My answers if not read well and examiner only see the headings then are empty. . Also word limit has been crossed in the questions where i know relevant content. . I answered only what is asked and concluded. . Not given the detailed intro n conclusion except few. . Also good, avg, namesake ratio varries in each paper with low good answers in paper 3 as specific was asked. . Essays were okay.. Optional i dont know aboout marking scheme scaling and all stuff discussed here. .only positive is i have written relevant content and not extra and attempted all questions in all papers except paper 3 , 2 10 markers were just 30 words. . Still in dielma about result as
@TETRACYCLINEhow was ur medical science???
@TETRACYCLINEthik thak tha bhai. . Bohot leli humari medical science ne. . Usse to thik hua
I was not aware of exact provisions of UAPA and ammendments. . I bluffed alot on general terms in that question. . Also in ancient knowledge question i write all other things but not TKDL i just mentioned the digitalisation on data. . In food processing question i missed word SAPADA. . Also i write mediocre answer of cyberdome and vishweswaraiya part and types of vulnerability. . I think paper 3 was very tough as exact demand was mentioned in question and also reduction in weightage of economy which used to award me 100 plus marks in previous attempt. 100 plus seems difficult this time atleast for me. . Baki UPSC meherban
@AnduinNaam to batao
@AzadHindFauzUpsc has long history of winning the cases that went into the HC and SC . . It will be repeated now
@Aequitaswhich tg group. . Name??
