@Neyawn I am not sure if I have interpreted question correctly or not i.e. are we talking about final solution for coaching institutes or for places like Delhi itself ?
We first need to set are radar right. Checking coaching institutes only or putting accountability where it actually shall be, the administration.
As per my understanding for coaching related issues some suggestions are:
1. There is no point in exploring new areas, the so called less congested areas of today will end up being ORN of tomorrow.
2. Instead it is better to explore hybrid mode like fixing no. of seats in offline mode to 180 (some might say it is too much but keeping in mind infra and cost it might take for one class this no. has to be at least 170-180 and buildings with good safety facilities can cater to this, also for those with more concern regarding this 180 no. they need to keep in mind the population density of India. But no. of classes with 180 students in 1 building needs to be scientifically evaluated and fixed.
3. De congestion of test centers by associating with schools, college buildings in as many states across the country as possible so that students far away get an idea of exam environment ( this i feel is 1 reason why many students with 2-3 attempt miss at there home and also harms them in exam and finally they have to come to place like Delhi even when they are done with there basic studies). This can be done through out the year rather than only during last days of pre or mains.
4. Coaching can cut down cost of courses by scaling up online availability. For concerns like mentorship by those who actually teach credit system based session shall be promoted.
5. Continuous category like system ( running/ walking ) based on classes attended by student, tests attempted, mentorships taken, scores in exams etc. so that students keep getting realization of competition from home as well as offline throughout year and does not end up bursting there false confidence bubble after 12-18 months of there youth is spent in this exam.
6. For course like SFG which actually rely on discipline and that to more in offline mode consideration for cancelling it just because right now we are not able to get infrastructure sorted is not prudent idea. Something that have delivered results shall be promoted rather than cut down. As far as cost element goes getting finances via sponsors or something likewise can be considered.
7. Most importantly gap between aspirants and teachers needs to bridged actively with teachers reaching out students ASAP online/offline whichever way possible and to fight out system of highs as whole rather than aspirants vs coaching.
