@Patrick_jane kindly tell answers for your thrown balls.
Sry for delay waited for more responses.
82)
B? Which language is this.
No crct answer isC.
Its tamil language the ecozones names are associated with sangam literature where whole region is divided into 5 tinais or ecozones.
1)Kurinji -Hilly region-Hunting & Gathering occupation.
2)Palai -Arid zone-Raiding & Plundering
3)Mullai- Pastoral Tracts-Animal Husbandry
4)Marudam-Wet lands-Plough Agriculture
5)Neital-Seacoast - Fishing & Salt Making
@Patrick_jane i thought lushai of mizo are blue mountain?? :/
Yes in fact
Phawngpui blue mountain national park is in mizoram.
But here upsc asked regarding niligiri which is blue(neel) + giri(mountains).
Gng through options we can find out that except jarawas other 3 tribes are from central to southern India.
@Patrick_jane 89) A
Crct
Oh but i would like to stick for a,bcoz source i refered gave imperial preference as trade related biases towards brtish prdcts.
Also forum test gave answer a
@Neyawn @Yo_Yo_Choti_Singh can you pls clarify this.
A
Brtish discriminated/discouraged Indian products by imposing extra dutys on exports
At same time it gave preferential treatment to brtsh imported products which is termed as imperial preference .
Its D
I think even the official key has given D, right ?
I think its 1999 question so upsc haven't gave any official key.
We are getting official key post 2011 or 2013 pre i guess.
Oh but i would like to stick for a,bcoz source i refered gave imperial preference as trade related biases towards brtish prdcts.
Also forum test gave answer a
@Neyawn @Yo_Yo_Choti_Singh can you pls clarify this.
Which app is this?
Goodnotes 5
Article 25 doesn't have anything to do with it.
No it is used by sc in Emmanuel case of 1986
The Supreme Court of India found that the expulsion of school children for not singing the national anthem constituted a violation of their right to freedom of expression. Three school children were expelled from school after refusing to sing the Indian national anthem since it was against their religious faith as Jehovah’s Witnesses. Their representative argued that the expulsion was an infringement of their fundamental rights to freedom expression under Article 19 and freedom of religion under Article 25 of the Constitution of India. The Court reasoned that a limitation on the right to freedom of expression must be based on a law with statutory force. Yet, there were no provisions of the law that obligated individuals to sing the national anthem and the State of Kerala’s Department of Education lacked statutory force to require school children to participate.
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1508089/
No it is used by sc in Emmanuel case of 1986
The Supreme Court of India found that the expulsion of school children for not singing the national anthem constituted a violation of their right to freedom of expression. Three school children were expelled from school after refusing to sing the Indian national anthem since it was against their religious faith as Jehovah’s Witnesses. Their representative argued that the expulsion was an infringement of their fundamental rights to freedom expression under Article 19 and freedom of religion under Article 25 of the Constitution of India. The Court reasoned that a limitation on the right to freedom of expression must be based on a law with statutory force. Yet, there were no provisions of the law that obligated individuals to sing the national anthem and the State of Kerala’s Department of Education lacked statutory force to require school children to participate.
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1508089/
This won't be applicable in the current situation right, post the ruling in 2018. https://www.jurist.org/news/2018/01/india-supreme-court-rules-national-anthem-no-longer-required-at-cinema/
No still applicable the national anthem case revolved around standing up as a mark to show respect.
Emmanuel case is about singing national anthem.
The below article gave a connection btw both cases.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thehindu.com/news/national/sc-modifies-order-says-national-anthem-not-mandatory/article22403095.ece/amp/
Answer was given All three are correct(C)
I think Art 25 (Freedom of conscience, practice and propagate the religion ) has nothing to do with National anthem. This is PYQ.
Answer would still remain sameC.
As of now no changes has been made by either govt or sc
Except national anthem case where in 2016 it gave interim order making mandatory for all theaters to play national anthem and people tostand upas a mark to show respect.
2018 Sc reversed the order and said it is voluntary for theaters to play national anthem but people as to stand up when it plays.
So it doesn't deal with singing of national anthem
The case that deal with singing of national anthem is Emmanuel case 1986,where it gave compulsion of singing national anthem is violative of art 25 and 19,as no statutory law was made in this regard.
@Patrick_jane Is it just me EPFO questions are tougher than CSE?
Toughness depends on the familiarity of topic.
In the case of History,questions are mostly factual in nature,but epfo has more degree of factuality than CSE.
But dont worry about making mistakes/not able to solve,going through past papers we get to learn new dimensions of the topics.
a? Keshav Karve
Crct answer isA
Hello All,
I am unable to post things. It is showing as "schedule post" some crap and the website goes bonkers. Happening with anyone else?
Yes same thing gng with me,but ignore it.just submit ur post like previously.after submitng it refresh the page.u vil see ur post.
Ps:dont click preview, it has some prblm.