"When in doubt, observe and ask questions. When certain, observe at length and ask many more questions."
Created this thread as a one stop solution for all members so that all the doubts wherein any conceptual clarification is required can be solved here.
In a question like this, where I know nothing about it, statement 4 appears general to me so I can consider it to be right, whereas in statement 1, I become apprehensive of it since they have used the word ‘substantial’. (I mean kitna hi save ho sakta h!) but then this website says answer is c 🤷🏻♀️. How to handle a question like this?@Neyawn ?
Just 3 clarifications
1. Habitat Rights to PVTG are granted by Tribal Affairs ministry under FRA, irrespective of anywhere they are...inside a national park, WS or tiger reserve?
2. Home Affairs ministry decides categorization of PVTG?
3. Critical Tiger Habitat is defined under WPA while Critical Wildlife Habitat is defined under FRA. Whats the implication of this statement?
Just 3 clarifications
1. Habitat Rights to PVTG are granted by Tribal Affairs ministry under FRA, irrespective of anywhere they are...inside a national park, WS or tiger reserve?
2. Home Affairs ministry decides categorization of PVTG?
3. Critical Tiger Habitat is defined under WPA while Critical Wildlife Habitat is defined under FRA. Whats the implication of this statement?
Wrt 3rd statement -
Critical tiger habitat - declared under WPA - CTH is Part of tiger reserves- In consultation with subject experts (no gram sabha role) - mainly focusing on tiger conservation.
Critical wildlife habitat- under FRA - CWLH is a Part of WLS Or NP - mandatory consultation with gram sabha and affected people required - focused on wildlife conservation (not only tigers)
Forest rights for habitation/livelihood not allowed in CTH. But the recent issue was Mankidias of Simlipal TR - collect siali from the CTH region of the TR. now that right is being denied to them under the WPA.
It's an issue of overlapping of rights provided under FRA and what WPA says I think.
Hi, can anyone recommend a source where I could find past prelims papers arranged subjectwise?
https://blog.forumias.com/prelims-previous-year-question-quiz/
- According toArticle 262of the Constitution,Parliament may by lawprovide for the adjudication of a water dispute over inter-state rivers.
- Parliament has enacted theInter State River Water Dispute Act, 1956in this regard, according to whichCentral government may set up a tribunal, on therequest of state government, for the adjudication of above such dispute, whose decision isfinal and bindingon both parties