ASEAN
ASEAN
Promotes economic and political integration and regional peace in Southeast Asia — motto “One Vision, One Identity, One Community.”
Foundation and the ASEAN Way
- Established by the Bangkok Declaration (1967) to build a common front against communism; a Cold War product initially focused on security. Headquarters Jakarta; three pillars — Political-Security, Economic, Socio-Cultural.
- The ASEAN Way — consensus over majority rule, non-interference, respect for sovereignty; grounded in Panchsheel and portrayed as “Asian values.” Entrenched by the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation (TAC), 1976 and ZOPFAN (1971).
- Economic integration — AFTA (1992) cut tariffs and lifted intra-regional trade (Robert Keohane’s neo-liberal institutionalism); AEC single market and production base; RCEP extends integration to major Asia-Pacific economies. Wider architecture — ARF, ASEAN Plus Three, East Asia Summit, ADMM+. Own Charter (2008).
EU vs ASEAN
| Basis | EU | ASEAN |
|---|---|---|
| Character | Supranational — binding law, single market, monetary union | Intergovernmental — prioritises sovereignty |
| Decisions | Qualified majority | Consensus (the ASEAN Way) |
| Currency | The euro | No single currency — currency-swap arrangements |
| Diversity & engine | Franco-German engine; urgency of overcoming their hostility | Wide diversity (Singapore vs Myanmar); largest economies (China, Japan, India, South Korea) outside; no dominant engine |
As a third-world model, successes and challenges
- Kishore Mahbubani (with Jeffery Sng), The ASEAN Miracle — ASEAN practises “Pragmatic Regionalism”, building its own model rather than imitating the EU; a “beacon of hope” and an example of soft regionalism.
- C. A. Fisher — ASEAN defied all scepticism; the region once called the “Balkans of Asia” became a zone of peace. No war between members since founding. Amitav Acharya — norm localisation and norm subsidiarity explain its durability.
- Challenges — consensus can block decisive action (Rohingya crisis, Myanmar); persistent non-tariff barriers and low intra-ASEAN trade; US-China rivalry and Indo-Pacific militarisation (QUAD, AUKUS); the South China Sea dispute; the February 2021 Myanmar coup and a stalled five-point consensus.
India and ASEAN — the Act East ladder
Sectoral dialogue to strategic partner. 1992 (Sectoral dialogue partner) → 1996 (Full dialogue partner) → 2002 (Summit-level partner) → 2012 (Strategic partner) → Trade (AIFTA (2010), services (2015))
What UPSC has asked
Ten years of PSIR Mains questions, each with the flow snapshot and the model answer.
Open the PYQ Finder →How this is taught
The same ground, taught in the order the subject holds together, with the answer written in class.
The first session of Foundation 2027 is published in full.
Six programmes across three levels.
