Table of Contents
- 1. Why Politics?
- 2. Political Theory vs Political Science
- 3. Political Philosophy, Theory, Ideology, Thought – Know the Splits
- 4. Five-Stage evolution of Political Science
- 5. Approaches & Their Critics
- 6. Normative ↔ Empirical Debate
- 7. Textual vs Contextual Interpretation
- 8. Key Quotes
- 9. Positivism → Behaviouralism: “Count what is, ignore what ought.”
- 10. Why Behaviouralism peaked – and cracked
- 11. Post-Behaviouralism – Easton’s Credo of Relevance
- 12. Critical School: Behaviouralism = Status-quo Science?
- 13. Decline → Resurgence of Political Theory
- Scholar Index –
1. Why Politics?
• From Greek polis (city-state). Politics is “the art of the possible,” the craft of
reconciling differences to reach binding collective decisions.
• Aristotle: “Man is by nature a political animal.”
• Politics is power-laden—acquiring, retaining, exercising it. Garner’s state-centric
maxim—“Political science starts and ends with the state”—now competes with society wide readings.
2. Political Theory vs Political Science
| Political Theory | Political Science | |
| Focus | Why / should? (conceptual) | What / how? (empirical) |
| Method | Abstract reflection | Observation, statistics |
| Scope | Timeless, universal (⏤ Germino) | Context-bound generalisations |
| Bridge | Theory supplies the ideas, science tests them |
3. Political Philosophy, Theory, Ideology, Thought – Know the Splits
| Category | Core Question | Scholars / Pointers |
| Political Philosophy |
What ought to be? justice, liberty, equality |
Plato, Aristotle, John Rawls (normative) |
| Political Theory |
Explains political phenomena, may borrow from philosophy |
Leo Strauss calls it the search for the “right & good order.” |
| Ideology | Programmatic, dogmatic defence of power |
Karl Marx, liberalism, feminism… |
| Political Thought |
Time- & place-bound communal ideas |
Machiavelli, British idealists etc. |
“Every political philosopher is a theorist, but not every theorist a philosopher.” — exam-worthy
line.
4. Five-Stage evolution of Political Science
1. Greek–Ethical – Aristotle dubs it the “master science”; Barker calls it architectonic.
2. Medieval–Theological – St Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas fuse politics with
salvation.
3. Renaissance / Enlightenment – Machiavelli separates power from morality; Hobbes,
Locke, Rousseau, Montesquieu add social contract, rights, separation of powers.
4. Behavioural Turn – stats & surveys; David Easton wants politics “as it is, not as it
ought.”
5. Post-Behaviouralism – Easton’s “Credo of Relevance” reunites values with data.
5. Approaches & Their Critics
| Approach | One-liner | Champion | Classic Critique |
| Historical | “History is the root; PS the fruit.” |
Sabine, Machiavelli, Laski | Over-traditional, state-centric |
| Sociological | Politics embedded in social structure |
Catlin | Can downplay institutions |
| Philosophical | Purpose & morality of rule |
Leo Strauss | Relativity of values (⏤ Isaiah Berlin) |
| Empirical vs Normative |
Facts vs ought | John Locke, Mill, Marx, Easton vs Plato, Aristotle, Rawls |
Each calls the other incomplete |
Jacobson warns against both scientism & moralism; balance is key.
6. Normative ↔ Empirical Debate
| Normative | Empirical |
| “Best possible prescription” | “Describe, explain, predict” |
| Plato – knowledge state | Locke – property & consent |
| Rawls – fairness | Easton – systems analysis |
7. Textual vs Contextual Interpretation
• Textual: text as timeless artefact; risk = anachronism (think virtù vs virtue).
• Contextual: embed writings in economic-political milieu.
• C.B. Macpherson reads Locke through emergent bourgeois lens.
• James Tully situates Locke’s property theory amid dissenters’ rights.
• Critics ask: if every text is context-bound, can old ideas still guide today?
8. Key Quotes
• “Politics is the authoritative allocation of values.” — Easton
• “History is the best guide to politics.” — Machiavelli
• Without science, theory is worthless ethical residue. — paraphrasing Jacobson
• “Man is a political animal.” — Aristotle
9. Positivism → Behaviouralism: “Count what is, ignore what ought.”
| Building-block | Quick take | Must-cite names |
| Positivism | Social science should mimic natural science; value-free knowledge monopoly |
Auguste Comte (root), Logical Positivists |
| Behaviouralism | Systematic, empirical study of individual & group behaviour |
Charles Merriam, Gabriel Almond, V.O. Key, Harold Lasswell, Herbert Tingsten |
| Seeds | Post-WW I; bloomed after WW II | Frank Kent encouraged statistics in politics |
David Easton distilled eight foundations—Regularities · Verification · Techniques ·
Quantification · Value-Neutrality · Systematization · Pure Science · Integration.
10. Why Behaviouralism peaked – and cracked
Achievements
Precision, survey tools, comparative data; made political science look “scientific.”
Limitations
1. Over-complication – jargon > clarity.
2. Reductionism – numbers flatten nuance.
3. Reality gap – “ivory-tower” retreat (critique by Leo Strauss).
4. Ethical vacuum – values labelled metaphysical.
5. Status-quo bias – avoided big moral questions.
11. Post-Behaviouralism – Easton’s Credo of Relevance
• Trigger: 1960s crises—war, poverty, civil rights.
• Intellectual sparks: Thomas Kuhn (paradigms) · Karl Popper (falsification).
• Mantra: “Substance before technique.” — Easton, 1969 APSA Address
• Five watch-words: Action · Relevance · Social change · Values · Reality-connection.
“To know is to bear responsibility for acting.” — Easton
Critiques
• Philip Beardsley: science vs relevance is a false dichotomy.
• Still leans on systems theory it once denounced (Waldo: “raving, rumbling structure
without destiny”).
12. Critical School: Behaviouralism = Status-quo Science?
| Critic | Charge |
| Dante Germino | “Quantification without reflection” killed political theory. |
| Theodor Adorno & Max Horkheimer |
Instrumental rationality props up capitalism. |
| Jürgen Habermas | Technology now colonises lifeworld; Behaviouralism applauds. |
| Herbert Marcuse | Mass media creates one-dimensional man, dampening revolt. |
Yet even critics admit Behaviouralism’s technique revolution (see Talcott Parsons).
13. Decline → Resurgence of Political Theory
Why it declined (per Easton)
Historicism · Moral relativism · Hyper-factualism · Science fetish.
Mid-century verdict (Alfred Cobban): theory “played no role” in both capitalism &
communism.
Why it bounced back
| Catalyst | Thinker & Text |
| Experience as philosophy | Michael Oakeshott –Experience and Its Modes |
| Lost public realm | Hannah Arendt –The Human Condition |
| Return to classics | Leo Strauss |
| Justice re-imagined | John Rawls –A Theory of Justice |
| Democracy, property, class | C.B. Macpherson |
Scholar Index –
Adorno · Alfred Cobban · Aristotle · Auguste Comte · Barker · Beardsley · Berlin · British
Idealists (Bradley, Bosanquet) · Charles Merriam · C.B. Macpherson · Dante Germino ·
David Easton · Frank Kent · Gabriel Almond · Garner · Harold Lasswell · Hannah Arendt ·
Herbert Marcuse · Herbert Tingsten · Hobbes · Isaiah Berlin · J.S. Mill · James Tully ·
Jürgen Habermas · Karl Marx · Karl Popper · Leo Strauss · Locke · Logical Positivists · Laski
· Machiavelli · Michael Oakeshott · Montesquieu · Philip Beardsley · Plato · Rousseau ·
Sabine · St Augustine · St Thomas Aquinas · Talcott Parsons · Thomas Kuhn · V.O. Key ·
Waldo (Dwight)
—Amit Pratap Singh