{"id":3447,"date":"2026-08-11T22:10:53","date_gmt":"2026-08-11T16:40:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/notes\/feminist-theory-of-the-state\/"},"modified":"2026-08-22T11:55:43","modified_gmt":"2026-08-22T06:25:43","slug":"feminist-theory-of-the-state","status":"publish","type":"psir_note","link":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/notes\/feminist-theory-of-the-state\/","title":{"rendered":"Feminist theory of the state"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"n-wrap\">\n<div class=\"n-shell\">\n<div class=\"n-crumb\"><a href=\"\/psir\/psir-notes\/\">PSIR Notes<\/a><span class=\"sep\">\u203a<\/span><a href=\"\/psir\/psir-notes\/#i-a\">I-A Political Theory and Indian Politics<\/a><span class=\"sep\">\u203a<\/span><span>Feminist theory of the state<\/span><\/div>\n<header class=\"n-head\">\n<div class=\"n-eyebrow\">Paper I \u00b7 Political Theory and Indian Politics<\/div>\n<h1 class=\"n-title\">Feminist theory of the state<\/h1>\n<div class=\"n-syl\"><b>Syllabus \u00b7 Paper I-A \u00b7 2<\/b> \u2014 Theories of state : Liberal, Neo-liberal, Marxist, Pluiralist, post-colonial and Feminist.<\/div>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"n-grid\">\n  <main class=\"n-body\"><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"feminist-theory-of-state\">Feminist Theory of State<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">Meaning &amp; central question.<\/span> Feminist theory studies how gender and sexuality are embedded in political structures \u2014 how patriarchal systems maintain and reproduce gender hierarchy. It asks whether the state is neutral, patriarchal, capitalist-patriarchal, reformable, oppressive or a terrain of struggle, ranging from militant critique to reformist engagement (the English Collective of Prostitutes&#8217; militant line: \u201cthe state is the greatest pimp\u201d).<\/p>\n<p>Two core concerns: the state as <span class=\"n-term\">regulator of public and private life<\/span> \u2014 <span class=\"n-sch\">Carole Hanisch<\/span>&#8216;s \u201cthe personal is political,\u201d with <span class=\"n-sch\">Kate Millett<\/span> (<em>Sexual Politics<\/em>) defining politics as \u201cpower-structured relationships, arrangements whereby one group of persons is controlled by another\u201d \u2014 and the state as an <span class=\"n-term\">instrument of power<\/span>, where male power is embedded in law, bureaucracy and welfare so that \u201cneutral\u201d policy reproduces patriarchy.<\/p>\n<div class=\"n-tw\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Strand<\/th>\n<th>The state, and its thinkers<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"n-term\">Liberal feminism<\/span><\/td>\n<td>State broadly reformable. <span class=\"n-sch\">Mary Wollstonecraft<\/span> (<em>Vindication of the Rights of Woman<\/em>) \u2014 women&#8217;s reason, education; <span class=\"n-sch\">Betty Friedan<\/span> \u2014 the housewife&#8217;s discontent, second-wave rights; <span class=\"n-sch\">Susan Moller Okin<\/span> \u2014 extends justice into the family, limits group rights that harm women. Critique: <span class=\"n-term\">Kathy E. Ferguson<\/span> \u2014 mere integration reproduces patriarchal norms.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"n-term\">Marxist \/ socialist feminism<\/span><\/td>\n<td>Women&#8217;s oppression tied to capitalism and unpaid domestic labour. <span class=\"n-sch\">Friedrich Engels<\/span> \u2014 ending capitalism ends economic exploitation; <span class=\"n-sch\">Robin Morgan<\/span> \u2014 \u201cWe can&#8217;t destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage\u201d; <span class=\"n-sch\">Clara Zetkin<\/span> (class + gender, working-class women); <span class=\"n-sch\">Heidi Hartmann<\/span> \u2014 patriarchy and capitalism, two systems working together.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"n-term\">Radical feminism<\/span><\/td>\n<td>State patriarchal in structure, not merely biased. <span class=\"n-sch\">Kate Millett<\/span> \u2014 all states are patriarchal; <span class=\"n-sch\">Carole Pateman<\/span> (<em>The Sexual Contract<\/em>) \u2014 the social contract hides a prior sexual contract; <span class=\"n-sch\">Sylvia Walby<\/span> \u2014 patriarchy is \u201ca system of social structures and practices in which men dominate, oppress and exploit women.\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"n-term\">Postmodern \/ intersectional<\/span><\/td>\n<td>Rejects fixed, universal gender. <span class=\"n-sch\">Judith Butler<\/span> (<em>Gender Trouble<\/em>) \u2014 \u201cidentity is performatively constituted\u201d; <span class=\"n-sch\">Luce Irigaray<\/span> \u2014 fluid female sexuality; <span class=\"n-sch\">Nancy Fraser<\/span> \u2014 redistribution and recognition; <span class=\"n-sch\">Iris Marion Young<\/span> \u2014 differentiated citizenship. Gender intersects race, class, caste, colonial history and sexuality.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<blockquote class=\"n-quote\">\n<p><em>\u201cThe original pact\u2026 establishes men&#8217;s political right over women.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p><cite>Carole Pateman<\/cite><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">Catharine A. MacKinnon \u00b7 Toward a Feminist Theory of the State<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Feminism lacks its own theory of the state because state theory itself reflects male power.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"n-quote\">\n<p><em>\u201cThe state is male in the feminist sense: the law sees and treats women the way men see and treat women.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p><cite>Catharine A. MacKinnon<\/cite><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The state institutionalises male power; the public-private dichotomy makes it appear neutral. Rape law is framed from a male perspective (low conviction rates); pornography (with <span class=\"n-sch\">Andrea Dworkin<\/span>, <em>Only Words<\/em>) is an action that harms, not mere expression; sexual harassment is systemic. She calls for an egalitarian jurisprudence that treats sexual subordination as structural.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">Welfare-state debate<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"n-lab\">Helga Maria Hernes<\/span> \u2014 the welfare state can be woman-friendly, bringing women into the public sphere and shifting dependence from the family to state wages and jobs. <span class=\"n-term\">Drude Dahlerup<\/span> \u2014 change owes as much to industrialization. <span class=\"n-term\">Anette Borchorst<\/span> &amp; <span class=\"n-term\">Birte Siim<\/span> \u2014 only the form of dependency changes; the state remains the biggest patriarchal structure. In post-colonial states, weak welfare implementation leaves women deprived of property, participation and protection. The state stays central for protection from male violence, reproductive rights, family and employment law reform, pensions and representation \u2014 so feminist theory treats it as neither simple enemy nor saviour, but a <span class=\"n-term\">terrain of struggle<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"n-lab\">Assessment.<\/span> The state is not gender-neutral; law and policy carry male assumptions; family and sexuality are political; welfare can empower and discipline at once; equality requires more than formal citizenship. (Critique: liberal feminism too institutional; radical feminism may essentialize all states as patriarchal; experiences vary across class, race, caste and community.)<\/p>\n<div class=\"n-pyq\"><span class=\"n-pyq-chip\">UPSC 2016 \u00b7 15m<\/span><span class=\"n-pyq-q\">Discuss the Feminist theory of the State.<\/span><a class=\"n-pyq-a\" href=\"\/psir\/psir-pyq\/discuss-the-feminist-theory-of-the-state-upsc-psir-2016-0201\/\">Answer<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"n-pyq\"><span class=\"n-pyq-chip\">UPSC 2021 \u00b7 10m<\/span><span class=\"n-pyq-q\">Comment on the feminist critique of state (150 words).<\/span><a class=\"n-pyq-a\" href=\"\/psir\/psir-pyq\/comment-on-the-feminist-critique-of-the-state-in-150-words-upsc-psir-2021-0206\/\">Answer<\/a><\/div>\n<h3 id=\"feminism\">Feminism<\/h3>\n<p>A diverse movement to end gender-based domination \u2014 never a single homogeneous model, and itself <span class=\"n-term\">resistant to essentialism<\/span>. Aims at equality, dignity, autonomy and liberation from patriarchy.<\/p>\n<h4 id=\"the-three-waves\">The three waves<\/h4>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">FIRST WAVE<\/span> (19c \u2013 1920s \u00b7 rights &amp; suffrage) \u2192 <span class=\"n-term\">SECOND WAVE<\/span> (1960s \u2013 80s \u00b7 action \u2192 theory) \u2192 <span class=\"n-term\">THIRD WAVE<\/span> (1990s \u2013 \u00b7 diversity &amp; intersectionality). <em>From winning rights, to theorising patriarchy, to pluralising the subject \u201cwoman.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"n-tw\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Wave<\/th>\n<th>Focus<\/th>\n<th>Thinkers<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>First<\/td>\n<td>Rights over theory: education, property, work, marriage &amp; custody, suffrage. Suffragette movement in Britain.<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"n-sch\">Mary Astell<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Mary Wollstonecraft<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Harriet Taylor<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Lydia Becker<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Elizabeth Cady Stanton<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Emmeline Pankhurst<\/span>.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Second<\/td>\n<td>Action \u2192 theory: the body, sexuality, reproduction, patriarchy, consciousness-raising; sex\/gender distinction sharpened.<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"n-sch\">Simone de Beauvoir<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Betty Friedan<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Shulamith Firestone<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Kate Millett<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Catharine MacKinnon<\/span>.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Third<\/td>\n<td>Postmodern, global, intersectional; diversity of race, class, sexuality, culture.<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"n-sch\">Naomi Wolf<\/span> (power feminism vs \u201cvictim feminism\u201d), <span class=\"n-term\">bell hooks<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Judith Butler<\/span>.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<blockquote class=\"n-quote\">\n<p><em>\u201cIf all men are born free, how is it that all women are born slaves?\u201d<\/em> \u2014 <span class=\"n-sch\">Mary Astell<\/span> <em>\u201cHe is the subject, the absolute; she is the \u2018Other.\u2019\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p><cite>Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex<\/cite><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h4 id=\"key-concepts\">Key concepts<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><span class=\"n-lab\">Sex vs gender<\/span> \u2014 sex is biological; gender is a social, cultural and historical construct that varies across societies.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-term\">Patriarchal dividend<\/span> (<span class=\"n-sch\">Raewyn Connell<\/span>) \u2014 all men benefit from patriarchy, though not equally.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-term\">Biological foundationalism<\/span> (<span class=\"n-sch\">Linda Nicholson<\/span>) \u2014 the rigid separation of fixed sex and variable gender.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-lab\">Reproductive technology<\/span> \u2014 <span class=\"n-sch\">Shulamith Firestone<\/span> (<em>The Dialectic of Sex<\/em>) called pregnancy \u201cbarbaric\u201d and sought women\u2019s control over reproductive technologies.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4 id=\"the-streams-of-feminist-thought\">The streams of feminist thought<\/h4>\n<p><span class=\"n-lab\">Liberal feminism<\/span> \u2014 equality <em>within<\/em> liberal-democratic institutions: equal education, work, voting, property, anti-discrimination law; the state is an instrument of reform, not the enemy; accepts the public\u2013private distinction. Thinkers: <span class=\"n-sch\">Mary Wollstonecraft<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Harriet Taylor<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Betty Friedan<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Janet Radcliffe Richards<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Susan Moller Okin<\/span>.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"n-quote\">\n<p><em>\u201cI do not wish women to have power over men, but over themselves.\u201d<\/em> \u2014 <span class=\"n-sch\">Mary Wollstonecraft<\/span> <em>\u201cThe legal subordination of one sex to the other is wrong in itself, and now one of the chief hindrances to human improvement.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p><cite>John Stuart Mill<\/cite><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"n-lab\">Radical feminism<\/span> \u2014 the root is <span class=\"n-term\">patriarchy<\/span> itself, a structural system of male domination pervading sexuality, reproduction, family and culture; the family is a political institution; rejects the public\u2013private divide; <span class=\"n-term\">\u201cthe personal is political.\u201d<\/span> Thinkers: <span class=\"n-sch\">Shulamith Firestone<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Andrea Dworkin<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Germaine Greer<\/span> (<em>The Female Eunuch<\/em>), <span class=\"n-sch\">Catharine MacKinnon<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Kate Millett<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Carol Hanisch<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Sheila Jeffreys<\/span>.<\/p>\n<div class=\"n-tw\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Point of contrast<\/th>\n<th>Liberal feminism<\/th>\n<th>Radical feminism<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Site of oppression<\/td>\n<td>Legal inequality &amp; institutional exclusion.<\/td>\n<td>Patriarchal structure \u2014 sexuality, family, culture.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Scope of politics<\/td>\n<td>The public sphere.<\/td>\n<td>Private life too \u2014 rejects the divide.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Method of change<\/td>\n<td>Reform &amp; inclusion within the system.<\/td>\n<td>Structural transformation of the gendered order.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"n-pyq\"><span class=\"n-pyq-chip\">UPSC 2019 \u00b7 15m<\/span><span class=\"n-pyq-q\"><\/span><\/div>\n<p><span class=\"n-lab\">Socialist \/ Marxist feminism<\/span> \u2014 oppression rooted in <span class=\"n-term\">both class and gender<\/span>; unpaid domestic and reproductive labour sustains capitalism; the sexual division of labour must be overcome \u2014 neither at the cost of the other. <span class=\"n-sch\">Marx<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Engels<\/span> (<em>The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State<\/em>), <span class=\"n-sch\">Clara Zetkin<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Heidi Hartmann<\/span> (<em>The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism<\/em>), <span class=\"n-sch\">Alison Jaggar<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"n-lab\">Postmodern feminism<\/span> \u2014 deconstructs binaries (male\/female), treats identity as fluid, rejects a fixed gender essence and feminist meta-narratives. <span class=\"n-sch\">Judith Butler<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Luce Irigaray<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Julia Kristeva<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"n-lab\">Black feminism<\/span> \u2014 race and gender oppression are inseparable; mainstream feminism ignored Black women\u2019s experience; <span class=\"n-term\">intersectionality<\/span> names the overlapping structures. <span class=\"n-sch\">Kimberl\u00e9 Crenshaw<\/span>, <span class=\"n-term\">bell hooks<\/span> (<em>Ain\u2019t I a Woman<\/em>).<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"n-quote\">\n<p><em>\u201cIntersectionality is not about identity; it\u2019s about power.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p><cite>Kimberl\u00e9 Crenshaw<\/cite><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"n-lab\">Cultural feminism<\/span> \u2014 revalues nurture, empathy and care, and more collaborative, non-dominating forms; criticised for essentialising femininity. <span class=\"n-sch\">Carol Gilligan<\/span> (<em>In a Different Voice<\/em>), <span class=\"n-sch\">Adrienne Rich<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Mary Daly<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"n-lab\">Eco-feminism<\/span> \u2014 the same patriarchal logic that controls women also exploits nature; attacks the dualisms male\/female, human\/nature, culture\/nature; stresses reciprocity, nurture, sustainability and earth-centred ethics. <span class=\"n-sch\">Fran\u00e7oise d\u2019Eaubonne<\/span> (coined the term), <span class=\"n-sch\">Vandana Shiva<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Carolyn Merchant<\/span> (<em>The Death of Nature<\/em>), <span class=\"n-sch\">Mary Daly<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Karen J. Warren<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Birkeland<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Diamond and Orenstein<\/span>. Criticism: risks <span class=\"n-term\">essentialism<\/span> \u2014 treating women as naturally closer to nature reinstates the stereotype feminism fights.<\/p>\n<div class=\"n-pyq\"><span class=\"n-pyq-chip\">UPSC 2017 \u00b7 10m<\/span><span class=\"n-pyq-q\"><\/span><\/div>\n<p><span class=\"n-lab\">Post-colonial feminism<\/span> \u2014 colonialism shaped modern gender oppression; Eurocentric feminism universalised Western women\u2019s experience; the agency of non-Western women must be restored. <span class=\"n-sch\">Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Chandra Talpade Mohanty<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Leila Ahmed<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Vandana Shiva<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 id=\"other-streams-recall-cues\">Other streams \u2014 recall cues<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><span class=\"n-term\">Libertarian<\/span> (<span class=\"n-sch\">Wendy McElroy<\/span>) \u00b7 <span class=\"n-term\">Womanism<\/span> (<span class=\"n-term\">bell hooks<\/span>) \u00b7 <span class=\"n-term\">Queer<\/span> (<span class=\"n-sch\">Judith Butler<\/span>) \u00b7 <span class=\"n-term\">Chicana<\/span> (<span class=\"n-sch\">Ana Castillo<\/span>).<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-term\">Transfeminism<\/span> (<span class=\"n-sch\">Julia Serano<\/span>) \u00b7 <span class=\"n-term\">Islamic feminism<\/span> (<span class=\"n-sch\">Leila Ahmed<\/span>) \u00b7 <span class=\"n-term\">Anarchist-feminism<\/span> (<span class=\"n-sch\">Emma Goldman<\/span>).<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-lab\">Mapping feminism<\/span> \u2014 <span class=\"n-sch\">Iris Marion Young<\/span> warned that rigid categorisation builds borders and limits knowledge.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4 id=\"feminist-critique-of-rationality\">Feminist critique of rationality<\/h4>\n<p>Western rationality is <span class=\"n-term\">not neutral<\/span>: it was defined in male terms. Binaries \u2014 reason\/emotion, man\/woman, rational\/irrational \u2014 place women in the subordinate slot; exclusion from knowledge production justified exclusion from politics. <span class=\"n-sch\">Susan Heckman<\/span> (more fundamental than the postmodernist critique), <span class=\"n-sch\">Walter J. Ong<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Luce Irigaray<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h4 id=\"the-public-private-dichotomy\">The public\u2013private dichotomy<\/h4>\n<p>Liberal theory treats the public sphere as political and the private as natural or apolitical; feminists show the family, sexuality and domestic labour are deeply political, and that the private sphere reproduces domination. <span class=\"n-sch\">Susan Moller Okin<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Carole Pateman<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Nancy Fraser<\/span> (the divide is socially constructed by power), <span class=\"n-sch\">Kate Nash<\/span> (the shift from \u201cdifference\u201d to \u201cdifferences\u201d).<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"n-quote\">\n<p><em>\u201cEquality with whom? Black men or White women?\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p><cite>bell hooks<\/cite><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h4 id=\"the-personal-is-political\">\u201cThe personal is political\u201d<\/h4>\n<p>A defining formulation of second-wave feminism, associated with <span class=\"n-sch\">Carol Hanisch<\/span> \u2014 published in <em>Notes from the Second Year: Women\u2019s Liberation<\/em>, edited by <span class=\"n-sch\">Shulamith Firestone<\/span> and <span class=\"n-sch\">Anne Koedt<\/span>. Personal suffering is not private failure: domestic violence, unpaid housework, control over reproduction and coercive sexuality are <span class=\"n-term\">structured by patriarchy<\/span>. The separation of public political power and private paternal power is ideological. Antecedents: <span class=\"n-sch\">Virginia Woolf<\/span> (<em>Three Guineas<\/em>) and <span class=\"n-sch\">Simone de Beauvoir<\/span> (<em>The Second Sex<\/em>). It turned consciousness-raising into a political act and reframed domestic violence and harassment as public, feminist concerns.<\/p>\n<div class=\"n-pyq\"><span class=\"n-pyq-chip\">UPSC 2025 \u00b7 15m<\/span><span class=\"n-pyq-q\"><\/span><\/div>\n<h4 id=\"butler-gender-performativity\">Butler &amp; gender performativity<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><span class=\"n-sch\">Judith Butler<\/span> (<em>Gender Trouble<\/em>) \u2014 gender is not something one <span class=\"n-em\">is<\/span> but something one <span class=\"n-em\">does<\/span>; identity is constituted through the repetition of citational acts, socially regulated.<\/li>\n<li>Parodic, exaggerated repetition can <span class=\"n-term\">subvert<\/span> the norm; the theory fed queer politics and the third wave.<\/li>\n<li>Criticism: dense language; dissolving the category \u201cwomen\u201d may weaken feminist politics and affirmative measures.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4 id=\"feminist-view-of-the-state-assessment\">Feminist view of the state &amp; assessment<\/h4>\n<p>The state is <span class=\"n-term\">not neutral<\/span>: it reflects and institutionalises patriarchy \u2014 women\u2019s labour, reproduction, inheritance and sexuality regulated by law; men cast as the \u201cnatural\u201d citizens; the coercive sectors remain male-dominated. It changes mainly under pressure \u2014 women\u2019s movements, democratic struggle, international norms such as <span class=\"n-term\">CEDAW<\/span>. <span class=\"n-sch\">V. Spike Peterson<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Zillah Eisenstein<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Sylvia Walby<\/span>. Internal critique targets essentialism, elitism, class reductionism and white bias \u2014 yet feminism remains one of the most powerful critiques of modern political theory.<\/p>\n<div class=\"n-next\"><a href=\"\/psir\/notes\/post-colonial-theory-of-the-state\/\"><em>Previous<\/em><b>Post-colonial theory of the state<\/b><\/a><span><\/span><\/div>\n<p><\/main><\/p>\n<aside class=\"n-rail\">\n<h4>On this page<\/h4>\n<p><a href=\"#feminist-theory-of-state\">Feminist Theory of State<\/a><a href=\"#feminism\">Feminism<\/a><\/aside>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Feminist theory of the state for the UPSC PSIR optional \u2014 PSIR Notes \u203a I-A Political Theory and Indian Politics \u203a Feminist theory of the state Paper I \u00b7 Political Theory and Indian<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"fx_note_key":"I-A.2.6","fx_note_sec":"I-A","fx_note_point":"2","fx_note_desc":"Feminist theory of the state for the UPSC PSIR optional \u2014 PSIR Notes \u203a I-A Political Theory and Indian Politics \u203a Feminist theory of the state Paper I \u00b7 Political Theory and Indian","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3447","psir_note","type-psir_note","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/psir_note\/3447","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/psir_note"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/psir_note"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/psir_note\/3447\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5157,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/psir_note\/3447\/revisions\/5157"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}