{"id":3480,"date":"2026-08-11T22:11:08","date_gmt":"2026-08-11T16:41:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/notes\/aristotle\/"},"modified":"2026-08-22T06:03:48","modified_gmt":"2026-08-22T00:33:48","slug":"aristotle","status":"publish","type":"psir_note","link":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/notes\/aristotle\/","title":{"rendered":"Aristotle"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"n-wrap\">\n<div class=\"n-shell\">\n<div class=\"n-crumb\"><a href=\"\/psir\/psir-notes\/\">PSIR Notes<\/a><span class=\"sep\">\u203a<\/span><a href=\"\/psir\/psir-notes\/#i-a\">I-A Political Theory and Indian Politics<\/a><span class=\"sep\">\u203a<\/span><span>Aristotle<\/span><\/div>\n<header class=\"n-head\">\n<div class=\"n-eyebrow\">Paper I \u00b7 Political Theory and Indian Politics<\/div>\n<h1 class=\"n-title\">Aristotle<\/h1>\n<div class=\"n-syl\"><b>Syllabus \u00b7 Paper I-A \u00b7 10<\/b> \u2014 Western Political Thought : Plato, <span class=\"cur\">Aristotle<\/span>, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, John S. Mill, Marx, Gramsci, Hannah Arendt.<\/div>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"n-grid\">\n  <main class=\"n-body\"><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"aristotle-the-father-of-political-science\">Aristotle \u2014 the father of political science<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"n-sch\">Aristotle<\/span> (384\u2013322 BCE) turns political thought from ideal construction to the study of constitutions, citizenship, law and stability. Son of the physician <span class=\"n-sch\">Nicomachus<\/span>, his cast of mind is diagnostic \u2014 cause, classification, cure. He is the father of <span class=\"n-term\">political science<\/span> and the leading realist of Greek thought, seeking the <span class=\"n-term\">best possible state<\/span>, not an unrealisable utopia. Politics is a <span class=\"n-term\">master science<\/span> \u2014 it concerns the ends of human life.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"n-quote\">\n<p>&#8220;State comes into existence for the sake of good life and continues for the sake of good life.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><cite>Aristotle<\/cite><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">Works &amp; method<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Major works: <span class=\"n-term\">Politics, Nicomachean Ethics, Rhetoric<\/span> \u2014 his political theory rests on the study of around <span class=\"n-term\">158 constitutions<\/span>. Method: scientific and empirical (data, facts, observation), <span class=\"n-term\">inductive<\/span> (particular to general, against Plato&#8217;s general-to-particular), historical, comparative and <span class=\"n-term\">teleological<\/span> (every being has a <span class=\"n-term\">telos<\/span> \u2014 &#8220;nature does nothing in vain&#8221;). In Rhetoric, persuasion rests on <span class=\"n-term\">ethos, logos, pathos<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"n-sch\">Will Durant<\/span> notes no philosopher was influenced by another as much as Aristotle by Plato; <span class=\"n-sch\">Michael B. Foster<\/span>: &#8220;Aristotle is the greatest of all the Platonists.&#8221; Yet \u2014 &#8220;Dear is Plato, but dearer is truth.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"theory-of-state\">Theory of State<\/h3>\n<p>The state is a <span class=\"n-term\">natural growth, not an artificial contract<\/span> \u2014 an association of associations, self-sufficing, the highest of all communities. It grows like an organism towards the good life and is <span class=\"n-term\">unity in diversity<\/span>, not uniformity. The polis is at once state, community, government, school and moral order.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">The state as natural growth towards the good life.<\/span> <span class=\"n-term\">Individual<\/span> (bare survival) \u2192 <span class=\"n-term\">Family<\/span> (daily needs) \u2192 <span class=\"n-term\">Village<\/span> (wider needs) \u2192 <span class=\"n-term\">State \/ Polis<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"n-lab\">State prior to the individual<\/span> \u2014 not in time, but in purpose and completeness; the whole is prior to the part. A hand cut from the body is a lifeless fragment; one who can live outside the state must be &#8220;a god or a beast.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"n-quote\">\n<p>&#8220;The state is by nature clearly prior to the family and the individual, since the whole is of necessity prior to the part.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><cite>Aristotle<\/cite><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"n-sch\">William Ebenstein<\/span>: &#8220;Aristotle&#8217;s state is a conception of moral sovereignty rather than of legal sovereignty.&#8221; What makes man political is <span class=\"n-term\">logos<\/span> \u2014 speech and reason, by which he distinguishes just from unjust. Hence: <span class=\"n-term\">&#8220;Man is by nature a political animal.&#8221;<\/span> The <span class=\"n-term\">best possible state<\/span> is great but not large \u2014 <span class=\"n-sch\">C. H. McIlwain<\/span>: &#8220;neither too rich nor too poor; secure from attack \u2026 homogeneous, virtuous, defensible, unambitious \u2026 great but not large.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"citizenship\">Citizenship<\/h3>\n<p>Citizenship is not residence, descent, or mere possession of rights \u2014 it is a <span class=\"n-term\">bond of active participation<\/span>. A citizen shares in <span class=\"n-term\">deliberative<\/span> and <span class=\"n-term\">judicial<\/span> office; an active public role, not a legal label.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span class=\"n-term\">Essentials:<\/span> ability to deliberate and judge; leisure; freedom from manual labour; property; education; experience \u2014 the capacity <span class=\"n-term\">to rule and be ruled<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-term\">Excluded:<\/span> women, children, the elderly, slaves, workers and tradesmen, aliens \u2014 on grounds of leisure, maturity and self-directing reason.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote class=\"n-quote\">\n<p>&#8220;Aristotle&#8217;s idea of citizenship is that of the economically independent gentleman who has enough experience, education, and leisure to devote himself to active citizenship \u2026&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><cite>William Ebenstein<\/cite><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Narrow and exclusionary, not democratic in the modern sense \u2014 yet the lasting insight holds: <span class=\"n-term\">citizenship is a duty, not merely a status<\/span>. Unlike Plato&#8217;s sharper split, Aristotle&#8217;s citizen is both ruler and ruled at different times.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"slavery-family-women-property\">Slavery \u00b7 Family, Women &amp; Property<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">Slavery<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Rests on <span class=\"n-term\">natural inequality<\/span> \u2014 the slave as an &#8220;animate instrument&#8221;; some fitted to rule, others to be ruled. He distinguishes the <span class=\"n-term\">natural slave<\/span> (slave by nature, fit for bodily use) from the <span class=\"n-term\">conventional slave<\/span> (enslaved by capture in war). <span class=\"n-term\">Criticism: Kant<\/span> \u2014 &#8220;each man is an end in itself&#8221;; <span class=\"n-sch\">MacIntyre<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Martha Nussbaum<\/span>, <span class=\"n-sch\">Charles Taylor<\/span> and <span class=\"n-sch\">Bernard Williams<\/span> reject the anthropology. <span class=\"n-sch\">Michael B. Foster<\/span>: &#8220;Aristotle justifies slavery on grounds of expediency&#8221;; <span class=\"n-sch\">Ernest Barker<\/span> \u2014 &#8220;more a justification of a necessity than a deduction from \u2026 observation of facts.&#8221; By modern standards, indefensible.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">Family &amp; women<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The family (<span class=\"n-term\">oikos<\/span>) is the first natural unit, an ethical community of <span class=\"n-term\">&#8220;spousal philia&#8221;<\/span> (love and friendship) \u2014 against Plato&#8217;s communism, &#8220;what belongs to many receives the least care.&#8221; On women he is deeply patriarchal \u2014 woman as &#8220;incomplete,&#8221; confined to domestic life; one of the weakest parts of his theory, exposed by <span class=\"n-sch\">J. S. Mill<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">Property<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Property is necessary and justified if honestly acquired \u2014 it satisfies the instinct for possession and makes generosity and liberality possible.<\/p>\n<div class=\"n-tw\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Ownership<\/th>\n<th>Use<\/th>\n<th>Verdict<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Individual<\/td>\n<td>Individual<\/td>\n<td>Excessive privatisation; dangerous if cut off from the common good.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Common<\/td>\n<td>Individual<\/td>\n<td>Some labour while others enjoy \u2014 resentment.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Common<\/td>\n<td>Common<\/td>\n<td>Impracticable, neglectful, conflict-ridden.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Individual<\/td>\n<td>Common<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"n-term\">Most acceptable \u2014 Aristotle&#8217;s preference.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>The rule: <span class=\"n-term\">property private, its use serving common life<\/span>. He opposes unfair acquisition such as interest, and warns against excessive wealth.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"theory-of-justice\">Theory of Justice<\/h3>\n<p>Justice is the heart of his politics \u2014 practical and institutional, not merely inward.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"n-quote\">\n<p>&#8220;When perfected, man is the best of animals, but when separated from law and justice, he is the worst of all.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><cite>Aristotle<\/cite><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div class=\"n-tw\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Type<\/th>\n<th>Principle<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"n-term\">General justice<\/span><\/td>\n<td>Complete goodness \u2014 law-abiding virtue exercised towards others.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"n-term\">Distributive<\/span><\/td>\n<td>Honours, offices and wealth by <span class=\"n-term\">merit, worth, desert<\/span> \u2014 geometric \/ proportionate equality. &#8220;Good flutes to good flute-players.&#8221;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"n-term\">Rectificatory<\/span><\/td>\n<td>Repair of wrong (fraud, injury, theft) \u2014 arithmetic equality; the judge restores balance.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p><span class=\"n-sch\">William David Ross<\/span>: by &#8216;just&#8217; we may mean &#8220;what is lawful or what is fair and equal.&#8221; <span class=\"n-sch\">Michael Sandel<\/span>: &#8220;Justice is teleological \u2026 figure out the telos \u2026 of the social practice in question.&#8221; <span class=\"n-term\">Equality:<\/span> proportional, not numerical.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">Aristotle&#8217;s formula of equality:<\/span> &#8220;It is unjust to treat equals unequally. It is equally unjust to treat unequals, equally.&#8221; \u2014 the seed of his theory of revolution: grievance arises when equals get unequal shares, or unequals equal shares.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"n-sch\">John Rawls<\/span> later moves towards a more egalitarian position (veil of ignorance, justice as fairness); <span class=\"n-sch\">Michael Walzer<\/span>&#8216;s plural spheres echo Aristotle&#8217;s sensitivity to context. <span class=\"n-term\">Plato vs Aristotle on justice:<\/span> Plato \u2014 duty-oriented, moral, inward; Aristotle \u2014 rights-oriented, practical, institutional and distributive.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"n-quote\">\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">UPSC 2015<\/span><\/p>\n<p><cite>Comment on Aristotle&#8217;s conception of equality.<\/cite><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h3 id=\"rule-of-law-theory-of-constitution\">Rule of Law &amp; Theory of Constitution<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"n-lab\">Rule of law<\/span> \u2014 law is less arbitrary and fairer than personal rule; free of personal feeling; the collective wisdom of ages, superior to even the wisest individual ruler. This is the direct criticism of Plato&#8217;s philosopher-king.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"n-quote\">\n<p>&#8220;Law is a reason without passion.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><cite>Aristotle<\/cite><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;The people, though individually they may be worse judges than those who have special knowledge, are collectively as good.&#8221; His defence of law is a foundation of <span class=\"n-term\">constitutionalism<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">Constitution<\/span> is not a mere set of rules but a <span class=\"n-term\">way of life<\/span> that fixes the moral character of a state. Classified by <span class=\"n-term\">number of rulers<\/span> and <span class=\"n-term\">purpose of rule<\/span>:<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">The six-fold classification of governments<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"n-tw\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Rulers<\/th>\n<th>Right form (common good)<\/th>\n<th>Perverted form (self-interest)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>One<\/td>\n<td>Monarchy<\/td>\n<td>Tyranny<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Few<\/td>\n<td>Aristocracy<\/td>\n<td>Oligarchy<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Many<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"n-term\">Polity<\/span><\/td>\n<td>Democracy<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">Polity \u2014 the best practicable government:<\/span> The golden mean between oligarchy and democracy; a moderate democracy on a <span class=\"n-term\">middle-class<\/span> basis. The larger the middle class, the greater the stability \u2014 it knows how to command and obey as free men. In modern language, polity anticipates constitutional democracy.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">Cycle of constitutional change.<\/span> <span class=\"n-term\">Monarchy<\/span> \u2192 <span class=\"n-term\">Tyranny<\/span> \u2192 <span class=\"n-term\">Aristocracy<\/span> \u2192 <span class=\"n-term\">Oligarchy<\/span> \u2192 <span class=\"n-term\">Polity<\/span> \u2192 <span class=\"n-term\">Democracy<\/span>. <em>Democracy gives way to monarchy and the cycle begins again. Modern critics note Aristotle often blurs government with the state.<\/em><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"theory-of-revolution\">Theory of Revolution<\/h3>\n<p>Revolution = any change in the constitution, rulers or political balance, big or small \u2014 even a democracy becoming less democratic. Aristotle is an advocate of stability, not a celebrant of upheaval. Causes run through a three-fold chain: a <span class=\"n-term\">state of mind<\/span>, an <span class=\"n-term\">objective sought<\/span>, and an <span class=\"n-term\">occasion<\/span> that triggers upheaval. The deepest cause is <span class=\"n-term\">injustice and inequality<\/span>.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"n-quote\">\n<p>&#8220;Everywhere inequality is a cause of revolution.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><cite>Aristotle<\/cite><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Inequality may be <span class=\"n-term\">real or imagined<\/span> \u2014 relative deprivation matters as much as the objective kind. <span class=\"n-term\">General causes:<\/span> greed of rulers, concentration of power, fear of domination, class struggle for office, racial conflict, disproportionate growth of one part, corruption, maladministration, neglect of small changes, a weak middle class. <span class=\"n-term\">Prevention:<\/span> obedience to law, civic education in the spirit of the constitution, fair distribution of honour and wealth, short tenures, preventing any person or class from becoming too powerful, patriotic feeling, a strong middle class and mixed constitution.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">Aristotle vs Marx:<\/span> Aristotle is conservative \u2014 revolution means political change and leads to instability; <span class=\"n-sch\">Karl Marx<\/span> is radical \u2014 revolution means total upheaval, the &#8220;locomotive of history,&#8221; driven by class exploitation towards communism. <span class=\"n-lab\">Criticism:<\/span> the meaning is narrow, political and status-quoist; yet the central insight endures \u2014 perceived injustice is the most combustible material in politics.<\/p>\n<div class=\"n-pyq\"><span class=\"n-pyq-chip\">UPSC 2017 \u00b7 15m<\/span><span class=\"n-pyq-q\">&#8220;Everywhere, inequality is a cause of revolution.&#8221; Comment.<\/span><a class=\"n-pyq-a\" href=\"\/psir\/psir-pyq\/everywhere-inequality-is-a-cause-of-revolution-aristotle-comment-upsc-psir-2017-1201\/\">Answer<\/a><\/div>\n<h3 id=\"aristotle-in-the-evolution-of-western-thought-modern-democra\">Aristotle in the evolution of Western thought &amp; modern democracy<\/h3>\n<p>Aristotle is the bridge between ancient ethical politics and later empirical, constitutional and comparative science.<\/p>\n<div class=\"n-tw\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Era<\/th>\n<th>Hallmark<\/th>\n<th>Thinkers<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Ancient Greece<\/td>\n<td>Ethics and politics fused; idealism then constitutional realism<\/td>\n<td>Socrates \u00b7 Plato \u00b7 Aristotle<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Medieval<\/td>\n<td>Religion and divine right shape the order<\/td>\n<td>Dante Alighieri<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Renaissance<\/td>\n<td>Secular turn; statecraft split from ethics<\/td>\n<td>Machiavelli<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Social contract<\/td>\n<td>Security, consent, popular sovereignty<\/td>\n<td>Hobbes \u00b7 Locke \u00b7 Rousseau<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Utilitarian \/ liberal<\/td>\n<td>Utility, representative democracy, rule of law<\/td>\n<td>Bentham<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Socialist critique<\/td>\n<td>Class contradiction; revolution as structural change<\/td>\n<td>Karl Marx<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Contemporary<\/td>\n<td>Normative revival; power, action, post-colonial thought<\/td>\n<td>Rawls \u00b7 Foucault \u00b7 Arendt \u00b7 Said<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">Contribution to constitutional democracy:<\/span> rule of law, constitutional (polity) government, mixed government anticipating checks and balances, middle-class stability, responsible citizenship and civic virtue, distributive justice and the common good \u2014 absorbed indirectly through later thinkers such as <span class=\"n-sch\">Montesquieu<\/span>. <span class=\"n-lab\">Limits:<\/span> slavery, exclusionary citizenship, patriarchy, preference for the small homogeneous polis prevent any direct identification with present-day democracy. <span class=\"n-sch\">Eduard Zeller<\/span>: the Politics is &#8220;the richest treasure that has come down to us from antiquity.&#8221;<\/p>\n<div class=\"n-pyq\"><span class=\"n-pyq-chip\">UPSC 2020 \u00b7 20m<\/span><span class=\"n-pyq-q\">Trace the evolution of western political thought from ancient to contemporary period.<\/span><a class=\"n-pyq-a\" href=\"\/psir\/psir-pyq\/trace-the-evolution-of-western-political-thought-from-ancient-to-upsc-psir-2020-1205\/\">Answer<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"n-pyq\"><span class=\"n-pyq-chip\">UPSC 2021 \u00b7 20m<\/span><span class=\"n-pyq-q\">Explain the Aristotelian view of politics &amp; its contribution to constitutional democracies.<\/span><\/div>\n<h3 id=\"aristotle-s-critique-of-plato-s-idealism\">Aristotle&#8217;s critique of Plato&#8217;s idealism<\/h3>\n<p>Aristotle is both Plato&#8217;s greatest disciple and greatest critic \u2014 he continues the tradition by correcting it. Both belong to the Socratic line, give primacy to the state, accept natural inequality and distrust unqualified mass rule; yet Aristotle moderates and often rejects Plato.<\/p>\n<div class=\"n-tw\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Issue<\/th>\n<th>Plato<\/th>\n<th>Aristotle<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Forms<\/td>\n<td>Form separate from matter<\/td>\n<td>Hylomorphism \u2014 form within the thing; knowledge from observation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>State<\/td>\n<td>Ideal, perfectionist, radical<\/td>\n<td>Best practicable state; golden mean<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rule<\/td>\n<td>Philosopher-king supreme<\/td>\n<td>Rule of law \u2014 law is reason; combined wisdom of many beats one<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Property &amp; family<\/td>\n<td>Abolished for guardians<\/td>\n<td>Private property with common use; family gives stability<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Unity<\/td>\n<td>Uniformity<\/td>\n<td>The state is a family of families \u2014 unity in diversity<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Method<\/td>\n<td>Deductive<\/td>\n<td>Empirical, from facts and circumstance<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<blockquote class=\"n-quote\">\n<p>&#8220;As Brutus loves not Caesar less, but Rome more, so Aristotle says, &#8216;Dear is Plato, but dearer still is truth&#8217;.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><cite>Will Durant<\/cite><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"n-lab\">Ebenstein<\/span>: &#8220;Plato found the corrective to his thinking in his own student.&#8221; The relation is often likened to <span class=\"n-sch\">J. S. Mill<\/span>&#8216;s to <span class=\"n-sch\">Jeremy Bentham<\/span> \u2014 deepest disciple, strongest corrector. Aristotle&#8217;s critique does not destroy the legacy; it transforms idealism into political realism.<\/p>\n<div class=\"n-pyq\"><span class=\"n-pyq-chip\">UPSC 2019 \u00b7 20m<\/span><span class=\"n-pyq-q\">Explain Aristotle&#8217;s critique of Plato&#8217;s Idealism.<\/span><a class=\"n-pyq-a\" href=\"\/psir\/psir-pyq\/explain-aristotles-critique-of-platos-idealism-upsc-psir-2019-1203\/\">Answer<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"n-next\"><a href=\"\/psir\/notes\/plato\/\"><em>Previous<\/em><b>Plato<\/b><\/a><a class=\"r\" href=\"\/psir\/notes\/machiavelli\/\"><em>Next<\/em><b>Machiavelli<\/b><\/a><\/div>\n<p><\/main><\/p>\n<aside class=\"n-rail\">\n<h4>On this page<\/h4>\n<p><a href=\"#aristotle-the-father-of-political-science\">Aristotle \u2014 the father of political science<\/a><a href=\"#theory-of-state\">Theory of State<\/a><a href=\"#citizenship\">Citizenship<\/a><a href=\"#slavery-family-women-property\">Slavery \u00b7 Family, Women &amp; Property<\/a><a href=\"#theory-of-justice\">Theory of Justice<\/a><a href=\"#rule-of-law-theory-of-constitution\">Rule of Law &amp; Theory of Constitution<\/a><a href=\"#theory-of-revolution\">Theory of Revolution<\/a><a href=\"#aristotle-in-the-evolution-of-western-thought-modern-democra\">Aristotle in the evolution of Western thought &amp; modern democracy<\/a><a href=\"#aristotle-s-critique-of-plato-s-idealism\">Aristotle&#8217;s critique of Plato&#8217;s idealism<\/a><\/aside>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Aristotle for the UPSC PSIR optional \u2014 PSIR Notes \u203a I-A Political Theory and Indian Politics \u203a Aristotle Paper I \u00b7 Political Theory and Indian Politics Aristotle Syllabus \u00b7 Paper I<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"fx_note_key":"I-A.10.2","fx_note_sec":"I-A","fx_note_point":"10","fx_note_desc":"Aristotle for the UPSC PSIR optional \u2014 PSIR Notes \u203a I-A Political Theory and Indian Politics \u203a Aristotle Paper I \u00b7 Political Theory and Indian Politics Aristotle Syllabus \u00b7 Paper I","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3480","psir_note","type-psir_note","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/psir_note\/3480","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/psir_note"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/psir_note"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/psir_note\/3480\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5152,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/psir_note\/3480\/revisions\/5152"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3480"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}