{"id":3578,"date":"2026-08-11T22:12:06","date_gmt":"2026-08-11T16:42:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/notes\/continuity-and-change-in-indian-foreign-policy\/"},"modified":"2026-08-12T02:57:06","modified_gmt":"2026-08-11T21:27:06","slug":"continuity-and-change-in-indian-foreign-policy","status":"publish","type":"psir_note","link":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/notes\/continuity-and-change-in-indian-foreign-policy\/","title":{"rendered":"Continuity and change in Indian foreign policy"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"n-wrap\">\n<div class=\"n-shell\">\n<div class=\"n-crumb\"><a href=\"\/psir\/psir-notes\/\">PSIR Notes<\/a><span class=\"sep\">\u203a<\/span><a href=\"\/psir\/psir-notes\/#ii-b\">II-B India and the World<\/a><span class=\"sep\">\u203a<\/span><span>Continuity and change in Indian foreign policy<\/span><\/div>\n<header class=\"n-head\">\n<div class=\"n-eyebrow\">Paper I \u00b7 India and the World<\/div>\n<h1 class=\"n-title\">Continuity and change in Indian foreign policy<\/h1>\n<div class=\"n-syl\"><b>Syllabus \u00b7 Paper II-B \u00b7 1<\/b> \u2014 Indian Foreign Policy : Determinants of foreign policy; the institutions of policy-making; Continuity and change.<\/div>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"n-grid\">\n  <main class=\"n-body\"><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"continuity-what-has-never-changed\">Continuity \u2014 what has never changed<\/h3>\n<p>Permanent factors (geography, history, culture) impart <span class=\"n-term\">continuity<\/span>; dynamic factors (domestic and geopolitical change) cause <span class=\"n-term\">change<\/span>. Foreign policy evolves gradually, not in sharp breaks with the past.<\/p>\n<p>Enduring interests, values and objectives \u2192 preservation of territorial integrity and independence, promotion of international peace and security, and economic development. The core continuing values:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span class=\"n-term\">Non-alignment<\/span> \u2192 independence from military blocs; abstentions from Cold-War-era votes and again on Russia\u2013Ukraine.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-term\">Multilateralism<\/span> \u2192 active participation in the G20, BRICS and the SCO.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-term\">Strategic autonomy<\/span> \u2192 independent decision-making; refusal to join alliances like NATO; balanced relations with Russia and the US.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-term\">Development cooperation<\/span> \u2192 the ITEC programme and concessional lines of credit as soft power.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-term\">Democratic principles<\/span> and <span class=\"n-term\">peaceful co-existence<\/span>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3 id=\"change-the-phases-of-india-s-foreign-policy\">Change \u2014 the phases of India\u2019s foreign policy<\/h3>\n<p>India\u2019s foreign policy has evolved through distinct phases, following <span class=\"n-sch\">S. Jaishankar<\/span>\u2019s classification.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">Six phases \u2014 from optimistic non-alignment to energetic diplomacy.<\/span> <span class=\"n-term\">1 \u00b7 Optimistic Non-Alignment<\/span> (1946\u201362 \u2014 resisting dilution of sovereignty, rebuilding the economy, consolidating integrity; a leading role in founding NAM) \u2192 <span class=\"n-term\">2 \u00b7 Realism &amp; Recovery<\/span> (1962\u201371 \u2014 pragmatic choices after the 1962 war; the Indo-Soviet Treaty (1971)) \u2192 <span class=\"n-term\">3 \u00b7 Regional Assertion<\/span> (1971\u201391 \u2014 liberation of Bangladesh through hard power; sanctions after Pokhran I (1974)) \u2192 <span class=\"n-term\">4 \u00b7 Quest for Strategic Autonomy<\/span> (1991\u201398\/99 \u2014 in a unipolar world: nuclear capability, engaging the US, Israel and ASEAN; the Gujral Doctrine) \u2192 <span class=\"n-term\">5 \u00b7 Balancing Power<\/span> (1998\/2000\u20132013 \u2014 the India\u2013US nuclear deal (123 Agreement); BRICS; stronger ties with Russia; common causes with China such as climate change) \u2192 <span class=\"n-term\">6 \u00b7 Energetic Diplomacy<\/span> (2014\u2013present \u2014 reassessing non-alignment; Neighbourhood First; a bid for a permanent UNSC seat; Act East and SAGAR)<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">Is \u2018energetic diplomacy\u2019 a justified label?<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Each earlier phase has a neat description; the current one is harder to categorise because India is still in the early phase of a major transition, with the near future not yet clear.<\/li>\n<li>Jaishankar rests the present phase on <span class=\"n-term\">Indian aspirations<\/span> and the goal of emerging as a <span class=\"n-term\">leading power<\/span>, recognising a world of convergences and issue-based arrangements.<\/li>\n<li>The India Way \u2192 treat the world as a <span class=\"n-term\">\u2018transactional bazaar\u2019<\/span> and major powers as <span class=\"n-term\">\u2018frenemies\u2019<\/span>, basing partnerships on interests, not idealism.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote class=\"n-quote\">\n<p>\u201cEngage America, manage China, cultivate Europe, reassure Russia, bring Japan into play, draw neighbours in, extend the neighbourhood and expand traditional constituencies of support.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><cite>S. Jaishankar<\/cite><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<ul>\n<li>Markers of energetic diplomacy \u2192 leadership of the <span class=\"n-term\">Global South<\/span>, a refined Indo-Pacific strategy, and plurilateral activism (BRICS, G20, SCO); the goal of <span class=\"n-term\">Viksit Bharat by 2047<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-term\">Critical view<\/span> \u2192 the label registers greater activism and risk-taking, but core objectives \u2014 autonomy, security, development \u2014 show strong continuity; the government has run ahead of Track-II (media, think-tanks, academia).<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-term\">Overall<\/span> \u2192 the phases show adaptability and pragmatism; \u2018energetic diplomacy\u2019 is a justified description of intensity and ambition, though it is an evolving and still-contested category rather than a settled doctrine.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"n-pyq\"><span class=\"n-pyq-chip\">UPSC 2025 \u00b7 20m<\/span><span class=\"n-pyq-q\">Critically analyse the different phases of India\u2019s foreign policy since independence. How justified, do you think, is S. Jaishankar\u2019s classification of the current phase as the phase of \u2018energetic diplomacy\u2019?<\/span><a class=\"n-pyq-a\" href=\"\/psir\/psir-pyq\/critically-analyze-the-different-phases-of-indias-foreign-policy-upsc-psir-2025-3910\/\">Answer<\/a><\/div>\n<h3 id=\"the-three-change-debates-qualitative-shift-post-cold-war-tur\">The Three Change Debates \u2014 qualitative shift, post-Cold War turnaround, Nehruvianism to Neoliberalism<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">A. Qualitative shift from previous regimes<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>PM Modi has claimed to make India a <span class=\"n-term\">leading power<\/span> \u2014 a qualitative step beyond India\u2019s earlier role as a <span class=\"n-term\">balancing power<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li>Institutional and strategic markers \u2192 the rise of the <span class=\"n-term\">Quad<\/span>, the <span class=\"n-term\">JAI trilateral<\/span>, Act East, foundational agreements with the US, and <span class=\"n-term\">SAGAR<\/span> in the Indian Ocean.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-sch\">Ronak Desai<\/span> \u2192 India no longer sees the Palestine conflict in zero-sum terms. <span class=\"n-sch\">Harsh V. Pant<\/span> \u2192 India\u2019s West Asia engagement has jettisoned the traditional balancing approach, with deeper ties with the UAE and Saudi Arabia.<\/li>\n<li>A firmer posture \u2192 the Doklam stand-off, surgical strikes, and pre-emptive strikes in Pakistan.<\/li>\n<li>Continuities that qualify the shift \u2192 Gandhian idealism, the Gujral Doctrine with some neighbours, strategic autonomy, and South\u2013South cooperation.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-sch\">C. Raja Mohan<\/span> (<em>Modi\u2019s World<\/em>) \u2192 Modi\u2019s foreign policy heralds the <span class=\"n-term\">\u201cThird Republic\u201d<\/span> \u2014 after the Nehruvian era and the Manmohan era of economic reform.<\/li>\n<li>The change is one of <span class=\"n-term\">pace, ambition and risk-appetite<\/span> more than a wholesale break with core national interests; qualitative shifts are real, but they build on continuities of strategic autonomy and civilisational identity.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"n-pyq\"><span class=\"n-pyq-chip\">UPSC 2018 \u00b7 10m<\/span><span class=\"n-pyq-q\">\u201cIndia\u2019s current foreign policy marks significant qualitative shifts from that of previous regimes.\u201d Discuss.<\/span><a class=\"n-pyq-a\" href=\"\/psir\/psir-pyq\/indias-current-foreign-policy-marks-significant-qualitative-upsc-psir-2013-3903\/\">Answer<\/a><\/div>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">B. The post-Cold War turnaround<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The turnaround arose from <span class=\"n-term\">systemic shocks, domestic economic stress, and a reframed doctrine<\/span> that recast older ideals for a new order.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote class=\"n-quote\">\n<p>\u201cThe collapse of the Soviet Union and the concomitant end of the Cold War\u2026forced India\u2019s policymakers to make drastic changes\u201d \u00b7 \u201cnonalignment ceased to have much meaning.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><cite>Sumit Ganguly<\/cite><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<ul>\n<li>The <span class=\"n-term\">1991 fiscal crisis<\/span> \u2014 oil prices after Kuwait\u2019s invasion, mass repatriation from the Gulf, loss of remittances \u2192 abandoning import-substituting industrialisation and dismantling regulations.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-sch\">Nirupama Rao<\/span> \u2192 the quest for strategic autonomy was driven by sustained economic growth, energy and maritime security, and access to technology, achieved by forging well-rounded relationships with all major powers.<\/li>\n<li>The post-Nehruvian discourse <span class=\"n-term\">translates non-alignment into strategic autonomy<\/span> and favours <span class=\"n-term\">multi-alignment<\/span> in a polycentric order.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-sch\">Shivshankar Menon<\/span> \u2192 sovereignty and territorial integrity remain the foundation of the international system \u2014 revealing limits in adopting coercive norms like <span class=\"n-term\">R2P<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li>Outcome \u2192 the <span class=\"n-term\">Indo-US civil nuclear agreement<\/span>, a recognition of India\u2019s emerging great-power potential.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-term\">Critical view<\/span> \u2192 crisis-driven liberalisation combined with strategic autonomy and identity-based continuities, even as tensions between sovereignty and universalist claims persist.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"n-pyq\"><span class=\"n-pyq-chip\">UPSC 2022 \u00b7 15m<\/span><span class=\"n-pyq-q\">Critically examine the major factors responsible for a turnaround in the trajectory of India\u2019s foreign policy in the post-Cold War period.<\/span><a class=\"n-pyq-a\" href=\"\/psir\/psir-pyq\/critically-examine-the-major-factors-responsible-for-a-turnaround-upsc-psir-2022-3907\/\">Answer<\/a><\/div>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">C. Nehruvianism to Neoliberalism<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span class=\"n-term\">Nehruvian foreign policy<\/span> \u2192 non-alignment, anti-colonialism and peaceful co-existence; leadership of NAM; refusal to join NATO or the Warsaw Pact. <span class=\"n-sch\">Rajiv Sikri<\/span> \u2192 Nehru sought sovereignty and strategic autonomy while supporting global peace and disarmament.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-term\">Transition<\/span> \u2192 the <span class=\"n-term\">1991 economic liberalisation<\/span> marked the beginning of a shift where economic growth, globalisation and pragmatic engagement took centre stage.<\/li>\n<li>The <span class=\"n-term\">US\u2013India Civil Nuclear Deal (2008)<\/span> \u2192 a symbol of the shift from a non-aligned posture to a pragmatic strategic partnership.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-sch\">C. Raja Mohan<\/span> and <span class=\"n-sch\">Harsh V. Pant<\/span> \u2192 India began to prioritise economic and strategic interests in an interconnected, multipolar world.<\/li>\n<li>Neoliberal markers \u2192 economic diplomacy, the WTO, multiple FTAs, and <span class=\"n-term\">Act East<\/span> deepening ties with ASEAN and Japan. Strategic partnerships \u2192 <span class=\"n-term\">LEMOA<\/span> with the US, the <span class=\"n-term\">Rafale<\/span> deal with France, and participation in the <span class=\"n-term\">Quad<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li>Continuities \u2192 caution about fully aligning with any power; strategic autonomy; South\u2013South cooperation; egalitarian stands at climate and trade forums.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-sch\">Shyam Saran<\/span> \u2192 strategic autonomy remains the guiding principle, but the means have changed. <span class=\"n-sch\">Ashley J. Tellis<\/span> \u2192 India\u2019s approach is flexible, forming partnerships without rigid ideological commitments.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-lab\">Conclusion<\/span> \u2192 India is moving towards a neoliberal outlook, but realist factors defining its national interest will continue to dictate the pace; it is not a prisoner to any single stream.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"n-pyq\"><span class=\"n-pyq-chip\">UPSC 2024 \u00b7 20m<\/span><span class=\"n-pyq-q\">Would you concur with the view that of late, India\u2019s foreign policy has been in a transition mode from Nehruvianism to Neoliberalism? Support your answer with the help of suitable examples.<\/span><a class=\"n-pyq-a\" href=\"\/psir\/psir-pyq\/would-you-concur-with-the-view-that-of-late-indias-foreign-policy-upsc-psir-2024-3909\/\">Answer<\/a><\/div>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">D. Major features of the 21st-century policy<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"n-tw\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Feature<\/th>\n<th>Content<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"n-term\">Multi-alignment<\/span><\/td>\n<td>Strategic autonomy alongside strategic partnerships with the US, Russia, France, Japan and ASEAN (<span class=\"n-sch\">C. Raja Mohan<\/span>).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"n-term\">Neighbourhood First<\/span><\/td>\n<td>Peaceful co-existence, connectivity and development cooperation with immediate neighbours.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"n-term\">Act East<\/span><\/td>\n<td>A strategic shift from Look East, deepening ties with South-East and East Asia to balance China\u2019s influence.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"n-term\">Economic diplomacy<\/span><\/td>\n<td>Make in India, Digital India, FTAs and regional trade arrangements (<span class=\"n-sch\">Harsh V. Pant<\/span>).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"n-term\">Multilateralism<\/span><\/td>\n<td>The UN, BRICS, G20 and SCO; reform of institutions and a UNSC bid (<span class=\"n-sch\">Shashi Tharoor<\/span>).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"n-term\">Security and counterterrorism<\/span><\/td>\n<td>The Quad, maritime security, and cooperation against state-sponsored terrorism (<span class=\"n-sch\">C. Uday Bhaskar<\/span> on defence modernisation).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"n-term\">Healthcare and climate<\/span><\/td>\n<td>Vaccine diplomacy and the International Solar Alliance.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"n-term\">Diaspora and narrative<\/span><\/td>\n<td>Soft power and constructs like the Indo-Pacific.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">Overall<\/span> \u2192 a shift from a non-aligned, reactive approach to a proactive, multi-vector one, combining traditional principles with contemporary priorities.<\/p>\n<div class=\"n-pyq\"><span class=\"n-pyq-chip\">UPSC 2023 \u00b7 10m<\/span><span class=\"n-pyq-q\">Explain the major features of India\u2019s Foreign Policy in the 21st century.<\/span><a class=\"n-pyq-a\" href=\"\/psir\/psir-pyq\/explain-the-major-features-of-indias-foreign-policy-in-the-2ist-upsc-psir-2023-3908\/\">Answer<\/a><\/div>\n<h3 id=\"the-strategic-culture-debate\">The Strategic Culture Debate<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"n-sch\">Jack Snyder<\/span> coined <span class=\"n-term\">\u2018strategic culture\u2019<\/span> in <span class=\"n-term\">1977<\/span> \u2014 the set of principles, conditioned emotional reactions and habitual behaviour a strategic community shares regarding strategy.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span class=\"n-sch\">George K. Tanham<\/span> (<em>Indian Strategic Thought<\/em>, 1992) \u2192 India lacked a strategic culture, tracing this to four influences \u2014 geography, history, culture and the British Raj \u2014 plus the Hindu concept of \u2018time\u2019 discouraging planning, and Indians being kept out of strategic circles \u2192 foreign policy that is <span class=\"n-term\">reactive rather than proactive<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li>Rebuttal by <span class=\"n-sch\">Shivshankar Menon<\/span> \u2192 India has always been an independent actor; it practises <span class=\"n-term\">frugal diplomacy<\/span>, economical in entanglements but not engagements; a pluralistic, secular, defensive security perspective.<\/li>\n<li>India\u2019s contributions to strategic thought \u2192 the <em>Arthashastra<\/em>, non-alignment, Panchsheel, the Indo-Pacific vision; Nehru\u2019s non-alignment drew on Kautilya\u2019s <span class=\"n-term\">mandala<\/span> of concentric circles.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-sch\">Bharat Karnad<\/span> \u2192 the Chinese <span class=\"n-term\">Wei-qi<\/span> model scores over India\u2019s less-engaged, mandala-infused approach; strategic autonomy has led to strategic diminution.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-sch\">David Malone<\/span> \u2192 the absence of a \u201cgrand strategy\u201d has been advantageous \u2014 the ability to improvise fits a pragmatic international stance.<\/li>\n<li>The way ahead \u2192 <span class=\"n-term\">multi-sum security<\/span> (national, transnational, human, environmental, transcultural) replacing zero-sum games.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"n-sch\">Shivshankar Menon<\/span> stresses the need for India\u2019s diplomatic\u2013strategic\u2013academic community to develop its own perspectives (<span class=\"n-sch\">Raja Menon<\/span> and <span class=\"n-sch\">Rajiv Kumar<\/span>, <em>The Long View from Delhi<\/em>).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span class=\"n-term\">Does India have a strategic culture? \u2014 the fault line<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"n-tw\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>NO STRATEGIC CULTURE<\/th>\n<th>A DISTINCT ONE<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>reactive, not proactive \u2014 geography, history, culture, the Raj<\/td>\n<td>independent actor \u2014 frugal diplomacy, improvisation as advantage<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"n-sch\">George K. Tanham<\/span> \u00b7 <span class=\"n-sch\">Bharat Karnad<\/span> \u2014 the mandala loses to <span class=\"n-term\">Wei-qi<\/span>; strategic autonomy has meant strategic diminution<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"n-sch\">Shivshankar Menon<\/span> \u00b7 <span class=\"n-sch\">David Malone<\/span> \u2014 <em>Arthashastra<\/em>, non-alignment, Panchsheel, the Indo-Pacific vision<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p><em>Snyder coined the term in 1977 \u00b7 the way ahead: multi-sum security over zero-sum games<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"n-pyq\"><span class=\"n-pyq-chip\">UPSC 2018 \u00b7 10m<\/span><span class=\"n-pyq-q\">\u201cIndia is often said to have a rich strategic culture.\u201d Discuss.<\/span><a class=\"n-pyq-a\" href=\"\/psir\/psir-pyq\/india-is-often-said-to-have-a-rich-strategic-culture-discuss-upsc-psir-2013-3902\/\">Answer<\/a><\/div>\n<h3 id=\"conclusion\">Conclusion<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>India\u2019s foreign policy is the outcome of many determinants \u2014 geography, history, culture, social structure, economy, leadership, domestic milieu, defence and security, and the international situation \u2014 interacting at different levels of analysis.<\/li>\n<li>Permanent factors impart continuity; dynamic factors bring change \u2192 the movement from Nehruvian idealism to a pragmatic multi-alignment is best read as <span class=\"n-term\">evolution, not rupture<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li>Policy-making remains <span class=\"n-term\">leadership-driven<\/span>, working through the dominant power base of the PMO and the influence of the Prime Minister over institutions such as the MEA. At the same time the institutional base is undoubtedly <span class=\"n-term\">broadening<\/span>, as India\u2019s expanding international interaction demands more disparate voices \u2014 Parliament and the states, the NSC, think-tanks and universities, business and the diaspora.<\/li>\n<li>Across every phase, <span class=\"n-term\">strategic autonomy<\/span> has remained the defining value, adapted to a vastly transformed international order.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"n-next\"><a href=\"\/psir\/notes\/institutions-of-policy-making\/\"><em>Previous<\/em><b>Institutions of policy-making<\/b><\/a><span><\/span><\/div>\n<p><\/main><\/p>\n<aside class=\"n-rail\">\n<h4>On this page<\/h4>\n<p><a href=\"#continuity-what-has-never-changed\">Continuity \u2014 what has never changed<\/a><a href=\"#change-the-phases-of-india-s-foreign-policy\">Change \u2014 the phases of India\u2019s foreign policy<\/a><a href=\"#the-three-change-debates-qualitative-shift-post-cold-war-tur\">The Three Change Debates \u2014 qualitative shift, post-Cold War turnaround, Nehruvianism to Neoliberalism<\/a><a href=\"#the-strategic-culture-debate\">The Strategic Culture Debate<\/a><a href=\"#conclusion\">Conclusion<\/a><\/aside>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Continuity and change in Indian foreign policy for the UPSC PSIR optional \u2014 PSIR Notes \u203a II-B India and the World \u203a Continuity and change in Indian foreign policy Paper I \u00b7 India a<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"fx_note_key":"II-B.1.3","fx_note_sec":"II-B","fx_note_point":"1","fx_note_desc":"Continuity and change in Indian foreign policy for the UPSC PSIR optional \u2014 PSIR Notes \u203a II-B India and the World \u203a Continuity and change in Indian foreign policy Paper I \u00b7 India a","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3578","psir_note","type-psir_note","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/psir_note\/3578","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/psir_note"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/psir_note"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/psir_note\/3578\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3803,"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/psir_note\/3578\/revisions\/3803"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumias.com\/psir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}