[WpProQuiz 86]
Daily Quiz – UPSC Prelims Marathon: March 29
Comments
65 responses to “Daily Quiz – UPSC Prelims Marathon: March 29”
-
4/5
-
4 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time: 00:04:34
You have reached 4 of 5 scores, (80%)
-
Q.4 :- The Directive Principles help the courts in examining and determining the constitutional validity of a law. ?? it’s FR and not DPSP
-
5 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time: 00:00:59
You have reached 5 of 5 scores, (100%)
Average score 54.27%
Your score 100%
Thanks for attempting the Quiz. -
3/5
-
3/5
-
yes – civil engineering 🙂 🙂
-
i am science student and my blood boils 😀 when i see ambiguty in our laws!!
i believe you also from engineering background, as i observe so many political qns are put forth by you are once occurred to me also and i read whole law to clear it, 🙁 -
Hmm, that’s why Polity is difficult than Science – Ambiguity and Multiple interpretation !!!
Thanks dude for such a lucid explanation !!! -
hi ABG, good one, i also thought this long ago, but i realized the answer after studying act.
I will tell you my findings, how it was poorly drafted,
it is widely accepted that, untouchability is social problem and is directed against certain community,
Law should have mentioned that it is against that community and acts against them like denying access etc should be banned.
problem is, enuf ambiguity is left and became lawyer paradise.
ex: Suppose a person not from untouchable caste, but is denied entry due to mysterious reasons. this law is heavily unclear,
what is recourse…and infact it is happened that courts denied this action as untouchability. 😀 -
Private individuals can deny to render their service if they are not paid for their service. However, despite being paid if they are maintaining separate utensils to any customer because of his caste, birth etc then they will be considered as offender.
-
Right under article 23(question 1)is very much available to aliens I think.its not for enemy aliens.
Guys correct me if wrong. -
5/5…finallyyyyy
-
3 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time: 00:06:00
thnq forum ias team
-
Same thought.infact very poorly worded question,also question no 2 is misleading
-
Same issue….
-
5 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time: 00:01:50
You have reached 5 of 5 scores, (100%)
-
Question 2 has misleading language. Justice of liberty, equality and fraternity is not provided. It talks of Social Economic and Political Justice. I think the comma got replaced by of.
-
Denying access to any shop, hotel or places of public entertainment.
The above statement doesn’t give any basis of discrimination.It is just a general statement. So if you look at it from that angle then,it is false I think. If it mentions anything like CASTE as you said than it could be true.
Mere koh nahi lagta ki meih exam meih ittna yaad rakh paunga, I will only resort to logic.And as someone has mentioned above on the basis of dress code is valid.
-
‘Don’t underestimate the power of a common man’ … ;D 🙂
-
You are correct, grounds such as dress code etc are valid
-
social boycott isn’t covered by the act
-
In question 3 case 3 is wrong as denying access to shops hotels or public places not an offence but denying access based on certain grounds such as caste , religion etc. Offence and not on grounds such as dress code etc
-
If a private individual denies service on ground of CASTE of the person, whereas he is giving service to other caste – while both of them have agreed to pay required FEES – then it is the question of CLEAR DISCRIMINATION.
There should be CONTEXT of saying NO !!! And this CONTEXT and the related GROUND is judged by Courts !!! -
Lol.
UPSC will not make such a typo, I m sure. 🙂
-
I also have one doubt, what if these institutions such as hotels are owned by private individuals, can’t they deny to render their service to an individual. It is up to them, whom to give service and whom to not. What I remember is that private entities can say “no” in certain cases. So I ticked 3 as false.
-
** following** please upvote this comment if you find any answer.
-
http://socialjustice.nic.in/writereaddata/UploadFile/arpcr08.pdf
1.3 Main provisions of the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955, are as under:-
(1) Sections 3 – 7A of the Act define the following as offences if committed on the
ground of “untouchability” , and lay down punishment for them:
(i) Prevention from entering public worship places, using sacred water resources
(Section 3).
(ii) Denial of access to any shop, public restaurant, hotel, public entertainment,
cremation ground etc. (Section 4).
(iii) Refusal of admission to any hospital, dispensary, educational institutions etc.
(Section 5).
(iv) Refusal to sell goods and render services (Section 6).
(v) Molestation, causing injury, insult etc. (Section 7).
(vi) Compelling a person on the ground of untouchability to do any scavenging or
sweeping or to remove any carcass etc. (Section 7 A) -
agree
-
dekhte hain….waise marks toh aweinn hai…its a Fun..sbhi baccho ke saath 1 platform par aana..!! 🙂
-
4/5. The statement 2 is incrct due to the language of sentence justice of liberty equality and fraternity.
-
question no. 2 ,statement 2 . their is a problem.
-
nahi yaar,,,aaj ka 60 day ka marks dekh lena sacchai saamne aa jayegi..;D
-
After hitting 5/5…youre no more a common man!! 🙂
-
Tremendous improvement. Keep doing whatever you are doing for past few days 🙂
-
Bhaaii….har platform par Solid performance…kya baat hain..!!
-
I agree with you too. It cannot be ‘justice of’.
-
hmm, but I think if such question comes in UPSC – we should not consider as TYPO !!! And if there is TYPO – then Engender and Endanger waala kaand hoga – results late nikalenge – Some MP will write a letter from our behalf 🙂
-
Results
3 of 5 questions answered correctlyYour time: 00:02:43
You have reached 3 of 5 scores, (60%)
-
Definitely, the statement is not correct but is also not wrong.
Why?
My logic–> Preamble was based on the ‘Objectives Resolution’.
It is talking about Objectives.Preamble has JUSTICE, LIBERTY, EQUALITY and FRATERNITY.
It says Justice of Liberty –> We all know there is nothing as Justice of Liberty.
Thus, It must be a typo.
I should hence be considering it right and not wrong. though Justice of Liberty is not an objective and the statement is wrong.
Yet, it is not wrong as it was a typo.
-
4/5 in Polity…..big LOL….lolest!!
-
Same mistake has been done by me …And it’s just a platform where we learn and correct our error so don’t feel bad ..
-
Yo 🙂
-
3/5
-
I have a question – If anyone is being denied access to any shop, hotel or places of public entertainment NOT because of reason on BIRTH in certain castes, but as a SOCIAL BOYCOTT of a individual due to some other reasons, will it still be an offence under the Protection of Civil Rights Act of 1955.
This act defines civil rights as any right accruing to a person by reason of the abolition of untouchability by Article 17 of the Constitution.
I know that Lakshmikanth mentiones this act as an offence, but I think statement needs to be connected with REASON of BIRTH in CERTAIN CASTE, without which it will not come under the ambit of the ACT.
Please, if anyone has explanation related to it – do answer the query !!!
-
4/5
-
Results
5 of 5 questions answered correctlyYour time: 00:03:28
You have reached 5 of 5 scores, (100%)
-
I feel it’s TYPO
-
either sentence is incomplete or typo…
-
Yes, I agree with you !!!
-
How can 2nd question( 2nd statement) be correct – Justice of Liberty – it’s not an objective : I think this statement is wrong !!!!
-
Second consecutive 5/5 LOL!!!
-
Daily Quiz: March 29
Results
3 of 5 questions answered correctlyYour time: 00:05:11
-
aaj form me aa gaye,,,,;D
-
Results
5 of 5 questions answered correctlyYour time: 00:03:05
You have reached 5 of 5 scores, (100%)
-
Results
5 of 5 questions answered correctlyYour time: 00:03:10
-
THANKS
-
Daily Quiz: March 29
Results
5 of 5 questions answered correctlyYour time: 00:02:20
-
Nothing silly about it, it shows that you are sharp. A similar trick may be used by upsc and then you’ll be one of those who spot it and get it right. 🙂
-
Please rectify Question two. If the statement is justice ‘of’ then answer should be only 1. If the statement is ‘justice, liberty etc’, then answer will be both one and two.
-
4/5
-
5/5
-
Q2 justice of liberty, equality and fraternity?
-
Thanks ForumIAS. And kindly correct the typo in 2nd statement of Q2, marked the wrong answer because of it. Silly Me 🙁
-
3/5…..my dooms day 🙁
Leave a Reply