Plus, a long write up, repeating the basics.
https://blog.forumias.com/23-suggestions-for-those-writing-mains-2023/
Feeling relaxed or not ?
Long trip par Thora nikal jawao,u will feel much better.accha feel karogae.
Ultimate relax, playing monopoly right now :) will go on trips too
That's great ,Be happy.❤️
Tata,
Feeling relaxed or not ?
Long trip par Thora nikal jawao,u will feel much better.accha feel karogae.
Ultimate relax, playing monopoly right now :) will go on trips too
That's great ,Be happy.❤️
Thank you DM bro 😀
DM,
For CSE Maths 2024 analysis: https://forumias.com/post/detail/Mathematics-Optional-2024-Paper-Analysis-1727851791
@Master chalo thank God bhai. I am not the only one who thought that.Plus iss baar toh peripheral topics se question pucha.
Yeah but our sample size is miniscule. We need more people to hear it out.
For CSE Maths 2024 analysis: https://forumias.com/post/detail/Mathematics-Optional-2024-Paper-Analysis-1727851791
@Master yeah man, let's see.. aur log dekhenge toh pata chalega
tedmoselby the architect?
I am no knight. Do not call me Sir|Philosophy behind ForumIAS
ryzenauster,Best wishes for UPPSC mains 👍
+1 everyone!
I am no knight. Do not call me Sir|Philosophy behind ForumIAS
For CSE Maths 2024 analysis: https://forumias.com/post/detail/Mathematics-Optional-2024-Paper-Analysis-1727851791
Neyawn,
Also for TS, I don't think they are of any use now. Attempt PYQs of IFoS and CSE properly in exam mode.
For CSE Maths 2024 analysis: https://forumias.com/post/detail/Mathematics-Optional-2024-Paper-Analysis-1727851791
Paper 1:
- Found it very lengthy and did many silly mistakes e.g. I got even the p, q limit question wrong.
- It seems that either the question was simple and super lengthy or the question involved some trick (unlike recent previous year papers).
- I left 30 marks in sec A due to paucity of time (e.g. the paraboloid triple integral, the circle ABC and cone). Did everything else correctly in sec A except the extreme point question. Then in sec-B, left 20 marks straightaway in ques 5 due to the laplace and statics question. Further, one part of SHM or vector differentiation might be partially wrong.
- Overall, there were lesser questions from conventional topics and mandatory questions were harder. Even simple questions had heavy and involved calculations and more chances of screwing up. But given the competition, I can easily see people scoring 180-200 (without scaling).
Paper-2:
- Q1 went well - abstract algebra was doable (though didn't consider the `onto` keyword in homomorphism) and couldn't solve the x=1 part in the series convergence.
- Other questions in sec-A: Did the abstract algebra ones but somehow got even the simplex question wrong (I know I should have practised more). Also left 30 marks due to lack of time.
- Sec-B - mandatory question was mostly straightforward except the streamlines one was involved and the binary subtraction was tricky. Attempted only one other question in sec-B - the wave eqn one but probably messed up the boolean algebra question (as I didn't have much time left).
- Overall, barring the focus on abstract algebra, I think this paper was mostly on the expected lines. Again, 180-200 not too hard for veteran folks.
plmokn25688524,
@Neyawn Sir, one might start preparation now and get a good rank in CSE 2024 while someone who is preparing for years may flunk.
What separates them ?
Thoughts 🤔?
Neyawn,Paper 1:
- Found it very lengthy and did many silly mistakes e.g. I got even the p, q limit question wrong.
- It seems that either the question was simple and super lengthy or the question involved some trick (unlike recent previous year papers).
- I left 30 marks in sec A due to paucity of time (e.g. the paraboloid triple integral, the circle ABC and cone). Did everything else correctly in sec A except the extreme point question. Then in sec-B, left 20 marks straightaway in ques 5 due to the laplace and statics question. Further, one part of SHM or vector differentiation might be partially wrong.
- Overall, there were lesser questions from conventional topics and mandatory questions were harder. Even simple questions had heavy and involved calculations and more chances of screwing up. But given the competition, I can easily see people scoring 180-200 (without scaling).
Paper-2:
- Q1 went well - abstract algebra was doable (though didn't consider the `onto` keyword in homomorphism) and couldn't solve the x=1 part in the series convergence.
- Other questions in sec-A: Did the abstract algebra ones but somehow got even the simplex question wrong (I know I should have practised more). Also left 30 marks due to lack of time.
- Sec-B - mandatory question was mostly straightforward except the streamlines one was involved and the binary subtraction was tricky. Attempted only one other question in sec-B - the wave eqn one but probably messed up the boolean algebra question (as I didn't have much time left).
- Overall, barring the focus on abstract algebra, I think this paper was mostly on the expected lines. Again, 180-200 not too hard for veteran folks.
Psir के शेर किधर हैं ?
How was paper 2 of Psir ?
For me 10 markers were difficult. The others were fine.
But I royally messed up Paper 1. Couldn't complete the paper due to some dizziness. For a 20 marker only two pages and for 2*15 markers 1.5 pages each.Of all the problems I had in PSIR mocks, paper completion wasn't one among them. What a rather sad end to this attempt.🥲
Write your comment…
