@Patootie Totally agree with given arguments. Even I was sailing in the same boat. But the said letter definitely did make me think about a certain responsibility that even the Press have while carrying out the noble task in a pandemic. Let me elucidate:
1. The letter talks about how in the age of social media, IT and all the more- a pandemic, the Press serve as our eyes and ears as we are shut inside our homes. It becomes like this peephole through which we form perceptions about the prevailing disaster. This has a tendency to disturb one's mental peace to the extent that it has now become a hidden mental health epidemic.
2. It also cannot be overlooked that a lot of hoarding and panic buying is in turn hampering our chances of beating this pandemic.
3. I think hysteria and panic inducing coverage should be minimised. But then again. It is not so simple.
4. Also, increasing cases of suicide among COVID positive people is another huge concern. I mean it is a sad state of affairs when one does not even consider the option of fighting the disease and chooses death instead.
As I mentioned, I think the greater good definitely lies in reporting facts from the ground. But I would again add respectfully that all isn't rosy even in this side of the picture.
Journalism and reporting have been going on since ages but how an individual perceives the world in this age- mostly away from extended family, constant chatter of social media, amidst a pandemic has changed by leaps and bounds. I think there is more we can do to ensure some kind of sensitivity while reporting- like we expect while reporting suicide cases.
It isn't an open and shut case at least for me. It has surely left me thinking and I did not take a stand for the greater good because I thought we were discussing the dilemma, rather than answering a UPSC ethics question.