A few doubts regarding emergency provisions in the constitution.
1. Regarding article 360, Financial emergency- Can the president declare a financial emergency in a part of India? Or does it has to be declared in the country as a whole?
2. Regarding article 359 (3), suspension of the right to move to court for the enforcement of fundament rights- It says that the presidential order should be laid before each house of parliament.
But laxmikanth mentions that - it should be laid before each house of parliamentfor approval.
Doubt- the constitution just mentions that it should be laid before the houses. I think that means just like the reports of various constitutional bodies that are laid before each house and discussion takes place on them. However, laxmikanth interprets it that it has to be laid before each house and be voted upon to get approval. Which is not mentioned in the constitution.
So which interpretation is right?
Agar law ke nahi ho to time waste kar rahe ho.
A few doubts regarding emergency provisions in the constitution.
1. Regarding article 360, Financial emergency- Can the president declare a financial emergency in a part of India? Or does it has to be declared in the country as a whole?
2. Regarding article 359 (3), suspension of the right to move to court for the enforcement of fundament rights- It says that the presidential order should be laid before each house of parliament.
But laxmikanth mentions that - it should be laid before each house of parliamentfor approval.
Doubt- the constitution just mentions that it should be laid before the houses. I think that means just like the reports of various constitutional bodies that are laid before each house and discussion takes place on them. However, laxmikanth interprets it that it has to be laid before each house and be voted upon to get approval. Which is not mentioned in the constitution.
So which interpretation is right?
Agar law ke nahi ho to time waste kar rahe ho.
Pls ignore posted in wrong thread by mistake
