“To protect monuments, places, and objects of artistic or historic interest” is a provision made under
: (a) Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy
(b) Directive Principles of State Policy only
(c) Fundamental Duties only
(d) Directive Principles of State Policy and Fundamental Duties
I need a little help here... I think answer should be (d)
But it is wrong as per key. why?
For instance, suppose minister of finance takes a policy decision which results in huge loss to public exchequer but he/she didn't commit any crime under any act(PMLA,FEMA etc). Then he/she can't be held accountable for the decision until and unless he/she counter sign the decision which is not the case in Indian democracy.
Note - he/she can't be held accountable in a court of law, but parliament is free to censure the minister or council of ministers.
This doubt is regarding Positive Liberty V/s Negative Liberty:
What i understand by these terms is that Positive liberty is freedom to do or have something whereas negative liberty is freedom from something suchasdiscrimination.
In this context, I want to ask why " Article 16: Equality of opportunity in matters of public employment " comes under Positive Liberty and not Negative Liberty.
