Can governor "pardon" death row??? Means full innocence like the president power?
Forum Open test question:
With reference to the early Medieval period in India (800 to 1200 AD), consider the following statements:
1. The fall of the Roman empire drastically reduced India's trade with the West.
Is this statement correct or not? A previous test somewhere said there was a drastic decrease, but answer key says this statement is false. Barring the usual funda of "drastic" word, can anyone confirm what really happened?
2019 paper...two answers in official UPSC keys really bamboozled me:
1. When a State Legislature does not have a rule on a particular matter, itfollows theLok Sabha rule on that matter. This statement is correct.
2. The Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2010 were framed by the Government of India based on the recommendation of Ramsar Convention. This statement isnot correct.
No discussions required.....UPSC ne keh diya toh keh diya. Just sharing. Ratt lo bass
If you withdraw Rs. 1,00,000 in cash from your Demand Deposit Account at your bank, the immediate effect on aggregate money supply in the economy will be
[a) to reduce it by ₹ 1,00,000
[b) to increase it by ₹ 1,00,000
[c) to increase it by more than ₹ 1,00,000
[d) to leave it unchanged
I have been confused with this since 1 year. Everyone says its very easy and answer is D. Please kindly explain to my mediocre mind. I think it should be B.
1. Odisha’s Bhitarkanika National Park is the second-largest mangrove forest in India.
2. Mangrove cover in Gujarat is the second largest after Sundarbans in West Bengal.
I have come across both these statements a lot but they appear contradictory to me. They both seem correct according to multiple sources but I cant fathom. Can anyone elaborate?
forest cover as %age of total area of state arranged in descending order. The Env website just mentions namewise, which is very cumbersome to memorize trend. So I made it into excel sheet sorting. Here it is:
Lakshadweep | 90.33 |
Mizoram | 85.41 |
A & N Islands | 81.74 |
Arunachal Pradesh | 79.63 |
Meghalaya | 76.33 |
Manipur | 75.46 |
Nagaland | 75.31 |
Tripura | 73.68 |
Goa | 60.43 |
Kerala | 54.42 |
Sikkim | 47.1 |
Uttarakhand | 45.44 |
Dadra & Nagar Haveli | 42.16 |
Chhattisgarh | 41.13 |
J&K | 39.66 |
Assam | 36.11 |
Odisha | 33.15 |
Jharkhand | 29.62 |
Himachal Pradesh | 27.72 |
Madhya Pradesh | 25.14 |
Tamil Nadu | 20.27 |
Karnataka | 20.11 |
Chandigarh | 19.32 |
West Bengal | 19.04 |
Daman & Diu | 18.46 |
Telangana | 18.36 |
Andhra Pradesh | 17.88 |
Maharashtra | 16.5 |
Delhi | 13.18 |
Puducherry | 10.7 |
Bihar | 7.76 |
Gujarat | 7.57 |
Uttar Pradesh | 6.15 |
Rajasthan | 4.86 |
Punjab | 3.67 |
Haryana | 3.62 |
Ladakh | 1.47 |
UPSC 2018
If the President of India exercises his power as provided under Article 356 of the Constitution of a particular State, then
(a) the Assembly of the State is automatically dissolved.
(b) the powers of the Legislature of that State shall be exercisable by or under the authority of the Parliament.
(c) Article 19 is suspended in that State.
(d) the President can make laws relating to that State.
Why is (a) and (d) wrong? Answer is (b), which is true obviously. But (a) and (d) also seem true.....where is the catch?
Doesnt this complex legal jargon mean what is said in option (d)-That President can make laws relating to state. In Laxmi also this is mentioned.
Just 3 clarifications
1. Habitat Rights to PVTG are granted by Tribal Affairs ministry under FRA, irrespective of anywhere they are...inside a national park, WS or tiger reserve?
2. Home Affairs ministry decides categorization of PVTG?
3. Critical Tiger Habitat is defined under WPA while Critical Wildlife Habitat is defined under FRA. Whats the implication of this statement?
- According toArticle 262of the Constitution,Parliament may by lawprovide for the adjudication of a water dispute over inter-state rivers.
- Parliament has enacted theInter State River Water Dispute Act, 1956in this regard, according to whichCentral government may set up a tribunal, on therequest of state government, for the adjudication of above such dispute, whose decision isfinal and bindingon both parties