Any initiative to discuss test doubts? Maybe a 3hr live chat with a faculty every week. SFG 1.0 had this system after every five tests. Non-addressal of genuine doubts for conflicting questions makes the preparation very incomplete.
Please address this issue
Any initiative to discuss test doubts? Maybe a 3hr live chat with a faculty every week. SFG 1.0 had this system after every five tests. Non-addressal of genuine doubts for conflicting questions makes the preparation very incomplete.
Please address this issue
@forumiasacademy Can you please address this?
Any initiative to discuss test doubts? Maybe a 3hr live chat with a faculty every week. SFG 1.0 had this system after every five tests. Non-addressal of genuine doubts for conflicting questions makes the preparation very incomplete.
Please address this issue
@forumiasacademy Can you please address this?
Yes abhishek, we will get this done on Sunday. Kinda webinar :D
Let me alert the team .
p.s. Your persistence ! LOT TO LEARN !
When can we have that webinar? Maybe by the upcoming weekend? (by that time, polity tests will be over and we can have one session on all polity tests' doubts)
Please confirm
Any initiative to discuss test doubts? Maybe a 3hr live chat with a faculty every week. SFG 1.0 had this system after every five tests. Non-addressal of genuine doubts for conflicting questions makes the preparation very incomplete.
Please address this issue
@forumiasacademy Can you please address this?
Yes abhishek, we will get this done on Sunday. Kinda webinar :D
Let me alert the team .
p.s. Your persistence ! LOT TO LEARN !
When can we have that webinar? Maybe by the upcoming weekend? (by that time, polity tests will be over and we can have one session on all polity tests' doubts)
Please confirm
@K_H_Abhishek After all discussion here, We asked the faculty to take classes with the purpose of value addition, which we think is being done currently. Is there a scope of doubt removal classes after the 3 hour videos on each test? Just want to clarify.
Because faulty may not be happy taking additional classes on the same things he has already discussed in the class. Doubt session must have queries that went unresolved in the discussion classes. So we will need that clarification from the students end.
Thank you for your prompt response.
I watched the first video to address my doubts about the test, and it did not. For example: Test 1 -Q22: FC can be argued to uphold fiscal federalism too;Q43: states actually do not have power 'to amend' the constitution. The 50% ratification rule is to get their consent, and the consent is not amendment, and so on.
There were some such doubts (maybe 5% of the questions or less, every test) that needed some clarification. But I totally understand your point. If more people here think such a doubt clearance session is necessary, you may consider this. Else, I'm ok to look for other ways to clarify my doubts.
Please ask faculty to address these below conflicting points in the video (if not shot already)
Q13: CCoPA is now headed by M o Defence, not MHA
Q25: Option d is also possible
Q27: Governor can reserve ANY bill right? irrespective of being a central list or state list item; Also, where is such a list of constitutional discretions w.r.t bills given?
Q30: SC in BP Singhal case said Governor is not agent or employee of CG; Option 2 cannot be true
Q37: aid and advice of TAC?
Q50: In case of Art.163 conflict between G and State Govt w.r.t Advice, as G need not listen to the advice, how is it resolved?
Thank you.
Similarly, more the export, more accumulation of dollars, leading to rupee value coming down as the supply of dollars has increased (appreciation or strengthening)
