@utkarsh_mishrasociopolitical part I found very tough. Very pin pointed things were asked. Relations were difficult to establish. Took a lot of time in brain storming and then lack of time compromised content in easy questions too.
Indian philosophy questions were very tricky. Choosing questions became very tough.
Everytime after exam changing optional dilemma haunts.
@ajiteshmishra579160sociopolitical k 10 marker to clean bold kr rahe the
@nikhilrai0827880asking Absolute Monism of Spinoza i.e. Substance- which is in itself and through itself.
@nikhilrai0827880
here I wrote,
how the religions without God have shifted to ‘God worship’ due to practical difficulties. Practical difficulties of satisfying emotional sentiments of devotees. Eg Tirthankaras in Jainism now worshipped as God.
So, the religions without God are more of a theoretical and philosophical concept. But, practically and actually ‘God worship’ is practiced.
How you have approached?
@nikhilrai0827880alright! Do you know If any institute is going to have open discussion on paper?
@nightHAWKthanks, i will call them.
@Dipscientist citta left, thought a lot and wasted time. I think it has to related to ekagra citta bhumi, and concentrated on abstract forms and/subtle aspects of real objects as savicara/ nirvicara
@Dipyour interpretation also seems right, i also felt choosing questions very difficult in indian part. there will be test discussion in few days in vvr by ambuj sir. it will give more clarity.
Anyone interested in working and discussing on Philosophy PYQ of Paper-2 starting from Socio-political part? Discussion part will be limited to Sundays via call and written answers send by snapshots.
2-3 people at maximum will be effective, people who have completed syllabus and read for 2-3 years. Planning to finish 2-4 topics per week till March for Paper 2.
