@rawhull So people are this delusional that they go to any extent to prove their answers to be right.. to the point of discrediting respectable authors...what are you gonna do next.?rewrite special theory of relativity just because you assumed speed of light to not be constant
@rawhull So mr subject expert..in your delusional eyes there was a specific mention of "in the context of Indus water treaty" in the question right!!Also ever heard of dunning kruger effect ? please google and look at yourself..seems you are a patent manifesation of such a phenomenon
@rawhull From your assumptions i can glean a few things..only mr subject expert(whatever your name is) has access to and knowledge about a 60 year old water sharing agreement but not the editors or publishers of a relatively popular geography text book..Neither do the editors at Britannica have any idea of such an agreement and that panjnad is indeed chenab(according to your wild assumptions)
@Admgenalanezh I specifically mentioned it was him who assumed chenab to meet indus direct and not me...i am as confused by the question but still i would rather stick with sutlej..the mention of which i can find in atleast two sources
Mad respect to you man.!!scoring 124 in 2019..you'll make it through this time around
Please seek attention elsewhere..your vocabulary says volumes about your "colossal" essay
