Though i also have many views for all disputed quest bt people always prove themselves so no need to make all this as human tendency including me.....
Just want to ask is there any1 who thinks UPSC treat ghantasala as buddhist place rather port town......as i read out abt buddha idol to be laid there and recent excavation in Telangana abt a ghantsala......
Ps : bcz of that i marked D😆
Before i proceed want to clarify that eco is my best subject from the days of my college.......in treasury bills 123 cant be the answer........
As home loans always taken from financial institutions......so just eliminate it nd get the answer......
Credit card could be the confusing if 2 nd 3 would have been as option but no option so credit card in general taken as bank credit card....
I just wanted to share this plz dont argue if u think u r right with 123
Atb
Upsc dont delete a question as eng version prevailed. This time also they do that thing i remember the same matter even raised in parliament when upsc translate the "North Pole" as "Uttari Khamba"...
P s......no matter that these 2 r exaclty diff mean
@Equalizer actually trading by definition means buying and selling for profit, government do intervene through open market sale but that is to only drop the prices by boosting supply but they do not engage in buying, they only purchase through msp which was already there in option, thud to my understanding government trading should be eliminated.
Question asked about factors for change in price of rice. So even if govt using omo to drop the price hence this is a factor which question asked.
Sorry to interrupt once agn......bt gov only facilitate the market demand and supply so that price wont fluctuate much......bt trading is out of context....
Upsc that is the reason always have some edge to make the diff answer key bcz these pseudo fanciful inst cant understand the upsc and its context
Hey what's the answer of cyber insurance wala question?????2 reason for that......
1.read its hindi translation
2.willfully implied that someone phsically harm it.....else the cyber attack wont need to insert the wilful nature.....the statement clearly said it so if damage by accident not cover only by wilful....so obviously that some1 broken it or punch it
Wilfully doesn't mean physically, it means deliberately.
Yup I have read Hindi translation as well. Both means same
Then does cyber attack could be possible without the wilful nature as well......
2 reason for that......
1.read its hindi translation
2.willfully implied that someone phsically harm it.....else the cyber attack wont need to insert the wilful nature.....the statement clearly said it so if damage by accident not cover only by wilful....so obviously that some1 broken it or punch it
Wilfully doesn't mean physically, it means deliberately.
Yup I have read Hindi translation as well. Both means same
Then does cyber attack could be possible without the wilful nature as well......
Cyber attack/ cyber related security incident may be accidental or delibrate..
Do u think other as spoon feeder......attack always deliberate and wilful......else it mark with word "incidental" not wilful
2 reason for that......
1.read its hindi translation
2.willfully implied that someone phsically harm it.....else the cyber attack wont need to insert the wilful nature.....the statement clearly said it so if damage by accident not cover only by wilful....so obviously that some1 broken it or punch it
Wilfully doesn't mean physically, it means deliberately.
Yup I have read Hindi translation as well. Both means same
Then does cyber attack could be possible without the wilful nature as well......
Cyber attack/ cyber related security incident may be accidental or delibrate..
Do u think other as spoon feeder......attack always deliberate and wilful......else it mark with word "incidental" not wilful
I didnt mean to offend anyone
What I meant to say is
1.) Accidental: someone (you or someone else) connected any other device without the knowledge of that being infected by malware
2.) Delibrate: someone knowingly infected the computer with malware/spyware etc.
The point I am raising is that in second statement, it is not clear whose computer, we are talking about.
No other interpolation/extrapolation/interpretation.
Therefore I was looking for advice to whether make a representation on this ambiguity or not??
Bro i was also in that position when read it out but for that reason sometimes i also read hindi so that narrative came out......when i read hindi i was sure that its talking abt physical harm....rest atb
Just request you to read hindi for once
2 reason for that......
1.read its hindi translation
2.willfully implied that someone phsically harm it.....else the cyber attack wont need to insert the wilful nature.....the statement clearly said it so if damage by accident not cover only by wilful....so obviously that some1 broken it or punch it
Wilfully doesn't mean physically, it means deliberately.
Yup I have read Hindi translation as well. Both means same
Then does cyber attack could be possible without the wilful nature as well......
Cyber attack/ cyber related security incident may be accidental or delibrate..
Do u think other as spoon feeder......attack always deliberate and wilful......else it mark with word "incidental" not wilful
I didnt mean to offend anyone
What I meant to say is
1.) Accidental: someone (you or someone else) connected any other device without the knowledge of that being infected by malware
2.) Delibrate: someone knowingly infected the computer with malware/spyware etc.
The point I am raising is that in second statement, it is not clear whose computer, we are talking about.
No other interpolation/extrapolation/interpretation.
Therefore I was looking for advice to whether make a representation on this ambiguity or not??
Bro i was also in that position when read it out but for that reason sometimes i also read hindi so that narrative came out......when i read hindi i was sure that its talking abt physical harm....rest atb
Just request you to read hindi for once
Bro I'm trying to understand your point of view.. please let me know what does prompt to interpret it about physical harm..
Which word in hindi???
Bhai apke liye abhi hindi padha......usme saaf saaf likha h "yadi jaan bhuj kar kisi dwara"......means agr in general hua h toh koun dega ins cover as log khud tod denge.....
And ab agr maan lo anjane me tumhare comp me cyber damage ho jayega toh kya ins valid nhi hoga....no chance bhai.....cyber ins full protection deta h for any cause related to all kind of stuff......
Mrunal says it can be 1,2,3 or 3 only depending upon
They are still confused with the google given definition.....issued or owed.....come on dosto
If some one issues any kind of surety then only they could get the credit in the market.....so they owed as they issued......
Do clarify urself.....non financial doesn't mean loan taken by all except financial institutions.....now am not gonna give any clarification.....aur bhi option h wo bhi maan lo right
@Sappling bro if u r so convinced then why trying convince others? 😂🙏😁..accept 3 only..done
Hahahaa......bro in very first of my comment i said that its upto u am not convincing any1 just try to make some clarity as people were desperate for the ans.....
U just see i never tried to be part of other quest though i also have many reason to say on that but better to accept ur nd listen others
@Sappling jab naa hi 3 only maara hai and naa hi 123 , sala etna behes ho raha aur mein soch raha ki meine kya soch ke lagaya 1 and 2 only. Hahaha
Hahahaa......ye soch kar ki ye dono tumhe common man ke burden dikhe honge....treasury toh waise hi malamaaal h😁
Brothers, Experienced people kindly shed your views on cut off! Some people tell 96-97,others 92-93..It is casting doubts over certaintyPeople plzz!
Even these two range is comes under uncertainty.......how could one be certain of cutoff.....only people getting 110+ have certainty of their selection.....
Brothers, Experienced people kindly shed your views on cut off! Some people tell 96-97,others 92-93..It is casting doubts over certaintyPeople plzz!
Even these two range is comes under uncertainty.......how could one be certain of cutoff.....only people getting 110+ have certainty of their selection.....
Brother me talking about estimated cut off from upsc key!
For estimated cutoff u sought for certainty.......amazing
Anything above 100 with current keys of shankar vision or vaji have fair chance thats it......cutoff around 95+-2
Brothers, Experienced people kindly shed your views on cut off! Some people tell 96-97,others 92-93..It is casting doubts over certaintyPeople plzz!
Even these two range is comes under uncertainty.......how could one be certain of cutoff.....only people getting 110+ have certainty of their selection.....
Brother me talking about estimated cut off from upsc key!
For estimated cutoff u sought for certainty.......amazing
Anything above 100 with current keys of shankar vision or vaji have fair chance thats it......cutoff around 95+-2
93+-2..What is your take on this bro?
More are the chances of upswing......
But if 4-5 disputed quest then its like pendulum....i hope u understand my views......am also just aspirant like others
This time it is very difficult to trust answ keys especially for questions on blockchain, AI, non financial debt, gene, govt trading. One cannot simply assume science tech hai so all remaining correct after elimination.
What ever score you are getting through keys, real score will be either high or low.
Exactly that's why am saying 110 only can be said to done with their chances
