Can the info be this accurate?
Maybe he means in the past. Unsure though
I’ve experienced it last year. Was getting 109 according to various keys(marking doubtful as wrong) , actual marks was 95. Year before, 92 something according to market, but was 84.xx Last two year significant divergence between institutes and official key
Maybe he means in the past. Unsure though
I’ve experienced it last year. Was getting 109 according to various keys(marking doubtful as wrong) , actual marks was 95. Year before, 92 something according to market, but was 84.xx Last two year significant divergence between institutes and official key
I think Science and tech questions play a major role in this. Marking all correct and getting it validated by coaching keys too inflate our score. Since 2020 not all statements are correct in Science and tech questions.
Even this year , science and tech questions were loaded IMO, green hydrogen directly used as fuel - do they mean without mixing , or without liquifying. Former is true , latter is false. Even the pulsar definition is way too vague
This is the robotback guy 20 days before the exam. I have a feeling he might not be bluffing. @Murali bhai itni tagdi prediction pe toh complain honi chahiye...Sala paper kaise pta lag rha hai logo ko upsc ka?
These are general predictions, Serious candidates knew it already.
Less likely to be predictions , someone talked. These are way too precise to be just general predictions
@LightYagami the statement could also mean a magnetar. I also have my doubt on the home guard border battalion. To prevent infiltration is too direct. It is auxiliary for bsf, same way home guard is to state police. You take away the auxiliary to state police , while meaning changes. To be honest, it’s too open to interpretation
Home guard one is correct though. lifted straight from here https://dgfscdhg.gov.in/about-homeguard
auxillary to bsf.to prevents infiltration in times of external aggression. Given the disruptive pattern, don't you think it has possibility of being a trick statement ?
