Coaching centres and their irresponsible keys...
HFC in that random article doesn't stand for hydorfluorocarbons at all....It stands for hydraulic fluids. EVerywhere lubricants are a seperate product used in HFC refrigerant systems....Just because HFC and lubricants are appearing in the same place doesn't mean lubricants have hydrofluorocarbons in them.
In contrast, there is a research article which shows how hfc in a lubricant actually decreases its lubricity and increased wear and tear of the machinery.
https://mde.maryland.gov/programs/workwithmde/Documents/AQCAC_HFC12162019.pdf
This paper clearly shows which hfc can be used as lubricants. So the answer definitely will be D.
I am not going to argue what the paper setter thought. I can never know.
Coming to the document, I went through it....and could not find 'migration at local level' anywhere. Can you please point it out for me?
I could only see things like "local authorities" or "achieving SDGs at local level".
BTW guys,
the question about money bill and finance bill.....all the coaching institutions are going overboard and giving A as answer. In the hindi version of the question, they have used "vittha vidheyak" which means financial bill.... Though the english question can be interpreted in different ways , the hindi version is pretty clear. So the answer would be C. All three.
This is the only question I would contend with, vis a vis Forum's key and Vision's key.
Now....looking at the hindi version, in the constitution itself......article 117 is called vittha vidheyak........so, since english key cannot differ with hindi key.., upsc is going to either consider it so, i.e all three correct......or realise they have confused the aspirant and consider both interpretations as correct.
I contacted the UN body spokesperson regarding the GCM question. They replied back. This settles the GCM question.
The answer would be D. None. This is the reply.
"
Guys,
kisi ne wo China India proportion of irrigated land pe representation file ki hai kya?
P.S: Options debate nahi karna tha.......Bas ye jaan na tha ki log sirf yaha pe discuss karthe hai ya representation bhi file karthe hai.
P.P.S: I have filed representation on that finance bill and money bill Q
Kitna bakwaas seh loge sab......last year hi 13090 log pre qualify kiye the..... (abhi google kiya maine).
This year the number has to be higher..... Ye log jo bakwaas idhar udhar post karthe rehthe hai, thoda logically karle....
waise 8000 actually ka kya hi meaning hai.
Mujhe ye bhi nahi lagtha aaj aayenge results......Agar Saxena sir (didnt know who he was till yesterday) has put his name to it and claimed around 12th June ( unlike anonymous updates) , thats probably true.
Thoda tho hum bhi UPSC pe faith rakhle ki itna random stupidity nahi karenge.....ki without proper deliberation jaldi me results de de......
Why have a frenzy about this kind of updates.
zara socho.....
If the cutoff of SC ST category is falling too low........and UPSC decides ki UR me hum 1:12 le lenge.... par SC me 1:10....ye tho discrimination ho gaya na.....
Decisions like this get stuck in legitimate legal troubles...No?
If the ratio is constant.....last year se zyada log pre qualify honi chahiye.......If they decrease the ratio overall .., then the gap between UR and SC cutoffs will be the same.
My point is simple...Ye 'insider sources' are doing bullshit using all the frenzy of aspirants. Attention tumhara......revenue unka.