Mains 2019 Preparation and Discussion Thread

@sat_009ek dusre ki g maro

@bevancom
I agree with u in most count but respectfully differ from u in one count, regarding gs question -people giving examples. Friend there r about 12000 students writing mains and a few may had discussed, thought or written that question earlier. This may be case in many questions. But surely this will not give much edge to them as one two questions or even one two paper will not determine who will clear.

Gs discuss kro bhailog....maximum base for gs

@sat_009yea , presentation holds key to this question. Was under time crunch, so shifted to indegenous tribes & globalisation ques. But ,on hindsight, this question can be much scoring (2 phy anthro questions) , compared to what i attempted. Poor call.

@sat_009psir me log ro rhe the....Mai nhi dekh skta tum logo Ko chaapte hue...

@Anthromanbro these examples are peripheral the question is not regionalism its ethnicity and regionalism, see in anthro you wont be penalised for these examples but non relevant examples wont add up to score in map if you have drawn northeastern examples etc you will still get good marks.

@Chacha420okay chachaji

@sat_009mujhe to gst taxes subsumed hi nahi yaad aaye...sirf do likha

@Valar_morghulisquestion no. 7 is also good if you can present data well especially participant observation and applied molecular is scoring

P1 4 6 8
P2 3 6 8@Valar_morghulis

@bevancom
100% I agree

@Chacha420hota hai yar pariksha isi ka nam hai

@sat_009isi tarah interview call bhi nahi aayega

@Chacha420kiska

Lets form a thread for anthro mains discussion2019. . How many are interested???

@sat_009bhai tumne to 16 taxes likh diye honge

@Anthromanaap banao

@sat_009i wrote these examples for current relevance

@Chacha420nahi nahi 2 3 under all headings central state and local

@sat_009structured answers gives more marx