I have a doubt in T4- Q27. When a Bill endangers position of State HC, its reservation is obligatory on the part of Governor. Thus, making his 'justification to reserve/not reserve' inconsequential. So statement 2 should be incorrect.
As far as 3rd statement is concerned, a matter concerning local bodies, shouldn't the Bill be opposed to DPSP A 40 (Though that concerns only villages), and thus by that logic, a justified reason for Governor to reserve the Bill?
In that case, the correct answer should be Option B (statement 1 and 3 correct). Please guide?
