Subscribe to ForumIAS

Mains 2019 Preparation and Discussion Thread

Now that 1 week is over, it is time to shift focus to Mains. With barely 103 days left there is no time to waste.

curious_kid,rootand2 otherslike this
1m views

10.7k comments

@ranyo_asokaDisqualification for dismissal for corruption or disloyalty. —(1) A person who having held an office under the
Government of India or under the Government of any State has been dismissed for corruption or for disloyalty to the State
shall be disqualified for a period of five years from the date of such dismissal.
(2) For the purposes of sub-section (1), a certificate issued by the Election Commission to the effect that a person having
held office under the Government of India or under the Government of a State, has or has not been dismissed for corruption
or for disloyalty to the State shall be conclusive proof of the fact:
Provided that no certificate to the effect that a person has been dismissed for corruption or for disloyalty to the State
shall be issued unless an opportunity of being heard has been given to the said person.
9A. Disqualification for Government contracts, etc. —A person shall be disqualified if, and for so long as, there
subsists a contract entered into by him in the course of his trade or business with the appropriate Government for the
supply of goods to, or for the execution of any works undertaken by, that Government.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this section, where a contract has been fully performed by the person by whom it has
been entered into with the appropriate Government, the contract shall be deemed not to subsist by reason only of the fact
that the Government has not performed its part of the contract either wholly or in part

This is what the RoPA, 1951 says.

2.2k views

@RavsHC n SC for an MP as well

1.9k views

Itna deep discussion dekh kar lagta hai....I'm out of the race☹

2.2k views

Ab se no more discussion..bye bye friends.
Yaar... depression hone laga

2.2k views

@Chacha420last year i didn't write more than 3-4 scholars in paper 2. Part B mei toh sirf ek hi likha tha. Still got 168. Scholars are hyped. Although iss saal maine likh diye kuch because questions bahut jyada hi specific lag rhe the aur relevant content likhna mushkil pad rha tha. Expecting much lesser marks this year

2k views

Forum pe aaya dekha ye thread kuch 4 -5 page badh gayi hai. Ek hi question ke chalte. Tum log ko yaad kaise hai kya likha kya chhod diya.@Yes_I_am_in

2k views

@Yes_I_am_in
I agree. It was a specific question, should have have restricted to RPA. I ALSO KNEW about those cases but avoided mentioning them. It won't fetch any extra marks and there is wastage of time.

815 views

@paranthapijjaab ye sab kon dekhke jata hai? newspaper meim aya tha so written...bas.. sec 9A is about office of profit... itna detail me toh law optional thodi likhna hai apan ko

2.5k views

@dr-ahmednaaz8567section 123(3) ke saath lilly thomas case ka naam likhne me kitna hi time waste hona tha?

2.8k views

I don't even remember a word of what I wrote, but definitely not as good as the answers posted above.

1.9k views

#MeToo...

1.4k views

@pmishra997125bhai kuch to special likha hoga..like linking school of thoughts and theories to current issues...aise kaise itne marks mil gaye...prakash daale

1.4k views

@ranyo_asokano no, I agree. But was just getting the facts right. I already said apart from Section 8, whoever wrote other sections accurately would be rewarded. Normal aspirants like me didn't know about it.?

2.2k views

@paranthapijjahaha..i was confused myself after u posted the contract part... ab itna post mortem karke bhi jyada fayda nhi
.. some are already feeling low seeing new things.... wish u the very best bro.... ab lets jus wait fr result

2.5k views

@paranthapijjasab log normal hi hai bro... all who write mains have similar temperament atleast... jus that sometimes content lacks or presentation lacks ... which will come by practice?

2.5k views

@ranyo_asoka@TeddyWestsidewas also an equal participant in that.?

2.2k views

@paranthapijjahaan unko bhi all the best... aur sabko bhi..

2.5k views

@Chacha420bhai sab faaltu ki baatein hai, mai kuch bhi bol sakta hoon, log maan lenge. But mera personal opinion toh yhi hai ki jiski kismat acchi hoti hai usko mil jaata hai. bas ekdam faaltu cheeze na likho, baaki bhagwaan ke hawale. jaise ki yeh RPA act pe jo discussion chal rha, jinhone court case likhe unko number milenge, jinhone nhi likhe unko bhi milenge. Either of them ko nhi bhi milenge. Hence, jo bhi likha hoga theek hi hoga sochke khush rho result aane tak. frankly speaking mai toh 130 se jyada nhi expect kar rha tha uss paper mei. I don't know kaise check karte hai yeh log. Schools of thought IR ke kaafi use kie the, but unse bhi mujhe nhi lagta kuch special effect padta hai.

2k views

@TeddyWestside
Can't just write lily Thomas case, need to mention what court said. In such time stress situation, writing 10 to 15 words unnecessarily is costly, when in other questions we need time.?

815 views
Write your comment…