Subscribe to ForumIAS

[ Official ] How was the Prelims 2021 paper?

How was the paper guys ? 

jack_Sparrow,curious_kidand28 otherslike this
1.6m views

4.8k comments

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/readersblog/santhosh-pens-down/black-money-a-serious-menace-to-be-tackled-24487/


This mentions B as option for black money ,,,, though it mentions D too but both B and D can be options 

EiChan,
5.1k views

It is better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.“ - J.S.MILL


This quote by J.S.Mill is clearly applicable on this thread where everybody is just trying to satisfy themselves by justifying there irrational and illogical answers.
Its better to wait till the result and then you can say whatever you want.

EiChan,Udit_pathak
4.5k views
@Capedcrusader1  question ke option me independence judiciary he Kya . … option to ‘’independence of judiciary is safeguarded “  likha he .  Judiciary ki independence ka safeguarded hona ya na hona …ye to constitution ka basic structure he . 1973 se pahle  to safeguarded nhi tha . 

 99 amendment ko 4/1 ratio me judge ne independence ke against mana . Agr future me kisi amendment se judiciary ke independence ko destroy kr Diya jata he aur Supreme Court ka approval mil jita he to kya India federal nhi rahega .  

Just asking. … 

EiChan,Udit_pathak
5k views
@PeLhidunga future me koi amendment "independence of judiciary" athwa " independence of judiciary is safeguarded" ko amend karne wala koi amendment aa nahi sakta kyunki wo BS ka part hai. its called basic structure for a reason. 



EiChan,
4.2k views
@Capedcrusader1  question ke option me independence judiciary he Kya . … option to ‘’independence of judiciary is safeguarded “  likha he .  Judiciary ki independence ka safeguarded hona ya na hona …ye to constitution ka basic structure he . 1973 se pahle  to safeguarded nhi tha . 

 99 amendment ko 4/1 ratio me judge ne independence ke against mana . Agr future me kisi amendment se judiciary ke independence ko destroy kr Diya jata he aur Supreme Court ka approval mil jita he to kya India federal nhi rahega .  

Just asking. … 

Bicameralism is not the essential feature of Federalism. UK is unitary despite having house of lords and house of commons.Bicameralism was introduced by 1919 Act but was India Federal ?
Federalism is a power sharing agreement and like all agreement it needs an adjudicatory mechanism to resolve disputes between Federal and State governments; a role performed by Supreme Court in India. If the Supreme Court is not independent how will states safeguard their interest in face of Federal encroachment in their respective domains? Thats why Written Contract and Independent Judiciary are most important aspects of a federation.
State - A, Parliament UK India - C, Article 14 - These questions are not disputed.
StarkArya,
3.8k views
This thread has become source of entertainment
hemant23_iitd8676,Haryanaand2 otherslike this
4.5k views
koi rishikesh chalega? Akela kabhi ghuma nhi hu.
3.7k views

This is what happens when you don't read NCERTs :p

3.4k views
abstract from a political paper


4.2k views
After all this I feel, it would be B for federal polity, though I marked A...
3.8k views

federalism ka toh saaf saaf likha h laksmikant me. KI "independence ofjuduciary" is a feature. ye bhi doubtful hai??


Laxmikanth main "Bicameralism" bhi diya hai . Both are features of federalism, but the Q is which is more essential. Most likely A hi hai, but B can't be 100% ruled out as its a matter of interpretation in end. Its subjective. 

+1

Independent judiciary is essential when it comes to "separation of powers"  between organs of govt...it is also a feature of federalism, no question about it. Federalism essentially means "division of powers" among constituent units. Question framed to check conceptual understanding beyond laxmikanth.. Judiciary can be ans but not most appropriate option 

atulji,
3.3k views
Yes the answer should be B 
3.7k views
@D503 Bicameralism IS a basic feature of federalism. Your argument is in reverse order. Having a bicameral legislature does not make a polity federal. But a federal polity needs a bicameral structure to represent its constituents

But, the catch is that it is bicameralism that is the basic feature, not having elected members in it. You can compare it with Canadian model, where the upper house is not elected, but is still a federal polity with a bicameral legislature

On the other hand, an independent judiciary is a basic feature of any federation. A federation is fundamentally based on a contract. To be effective, any contract needs an independent adjudicating body


3k views

Overall...

Copper smelter...D 

Mitochondria...C 

Virus culture... A 

British model...in UPSC hands...

Federal polity.. B 

Indus... Chenab..

1935... B

I am glad that I have not attempted... Right to city 

Pressure cooker ...


Any more key disputes friends...


Though getting good score, as this is last attempt and thereby becoming high stakes game, pressure is piling up my friends...


Please do suggest any other disputes to get clarity







3.6k views
Just a question- is UK's judiciary independent? It is not supreme, though. All answer keys have marked it as A, probably right. Rest depends on UPSC. 
3.6k views
Deleted


3.5k views
@oopsiebut with respect to India.. it is possible -- which is asked in Q (A and B both can be essential features but B seems more close)


3.8k views
considering these are right, how much are you scoring approximately ? 


3.4k views
 virus are cultivated in artificial medium .. aren't they ? The question deliberately mentions both words artificial and synthetic.. Otherwise how can we have vaccines? Good probability i m wrong...just asking for conceptual clarity..for next year may be.


4.7k views
Write your comment…