[ Official ] How was the Prelims 2021 paper?

mayanksharma13019118said

Looks like devi lal contesting from 3 constituencies in 1991 is factually incorrect like someone here pointed out

https://www.elections.in/parliamentary-constituencies/1991-election-results.html

https://www.elections.in/parliamentary-constituencies/1989-election-results.html

mayanksharma13019118said

Looks like devi lal contesting from 3 constituencies in 1991 is factually incorrect like someone here pointed out

https://www.elections.in/parliamentary-constituencies/1991-election-results.html

https://www.elections.in/parliamentary-constituencies/1989-election-results.html

a_rakesh10399said

Please tell me is there a possibility that upsc can give multiple options as correct in gs paper 2 prelims exam??

bhuvanamalar1015412said

mayanksharma13019118said

Looks like devi lal contesting from 3 constituencies in 1991 is factually incorrect like someone here pointed out

https://www.elections.in/parliamentary-constituencies/1991-election-results.html

https://www.elections.in/parliamentary-constituencies/1989-election-results.html

Yes ,they seem to have framed qstn this based on an Indian express article which got it wrong.it shld be deleted but I don't think they would do it.

raj0007_mantoo725said

Devi Lal contested from three seats in 1991 and he lost in all. He contested from two seats in 1989 and won both. 

1989 (Vol I).pdf1991 (Vol I).pdf

 based on these documents too(official ECI data) questions seems wrong

ALADEEN_MFsaid

This year, I have seen so many "Veteran in UPSC'--->Making4-5 silly mistakes each (eg Bethun school, Right to privacy, ascending and descending order etc)

Few scoringabove 95+, they had differentmethods of cooperation...for eg Fearful of passing CSAT.....!!

Very very cooperative people.....loved it. 

No doubt, Everyone is playing a significant rolein bring down cut-off to itshistoric lowto-->84.5-86.5 or Even DOWN (NO damn plus minus 2)

Thanks everyone! :) :) 

Phantomsaid

15,16,19,29,30 are available to citizens only. Art. 19(1) (f) had right to property. after amendment it was shifted under Article 300A. So that amendment changed the scope as well?

javelinthrowsaid

@bhuvanamalar1015412 with so much confusion in answers across keys, even a person with 100+ score is not sure. and most confusing situation is with the people like me (score of 88) who despite numerous doubtful questions are hoping to get few more correct answers and a lower cutoff to qualify.

javelinthrowsaid

Phantomsaid

15,16,19,29,30 are available to citizens only. Art. 19(1) (f) had right to property. after amendment it was shifted under Article 300A. So that amendment changed the scope as well?

i marked this as citizens only out of sheer confusion!