Mains 2021 Result declared - In or Out?
So Mains 2021 has begun. Essay Paper is here
1. https://blog.forumias.com/upsc-ias-mains-2021-essay-question-paper/
2. GS Paper 1 : https://blog.forumias.com/download-upsc-ias-mains-2021-gs-1-question-paper
3. GS Paper 2 : https://blog.forumias.com/download-upsc-ias-mains-2021-gs-2-question-paper
/
How was your paper? How did you approach the paper?
@Duryodhan phir wo last yr wale 2 mustande Godzilla maar girayenge comment me😉
M toh last year hi aaya tha forum p. Ek bas 'Tu' ka yaad h mujhe. Aap bhule toh nhi ?
No 1,
@Duryodhan Akbar had told Abul Fazl that every low born who takes up education is not doing his duty ; toh iska matlab pehli baat they were concerned if any education at all. , it goes to Brahamanas and Persian elites2. Already there was division of where hindus and Muslims educated toh ek centre nahin ban paaya hoga3. Yaha promote karne ki jarurat nahin paddi thi , they could easily import them from persia . First Deccan sultante bulate the eg Bijapur and Golconda , fir jab woh decline hone lage , toh Woh sab mughal court jaane lage4. According to me , itna faayda nahin dikha hoga unhe , status quo se unko bahut benefit tha . Why to change ?? Toh resources and patronage ko direct kar dia gaya towards pleasure and literature jo rulers ki taarif kare5. Us time akbar ke time hi stagnancy aa gayi thi bahut saare domains main , infact Deccan sultante were much more vibrant , lekin waha bhi yeh saari vibrancy education main science ,logic ki taraf nahin , literature ki taraf thi
@Duryodhan chandrakanta ka krur singh
@zombieland form m aa gye h agog bhai .
Ek baar apni agogian script m kuch likh di yr
Bhai upsc ka danda gadhe ko ghora bna de. Script toh choti cheese hai. Script bhi change ho gya.
Rudra pe kuch tippani kijiye shriman savinay nivedan hai.
@zombieland but zombies abhi bhi dead hain😝Rudra pe kuch tippani kijiye shriman savinay nivedan hai.
Army of dead dekha? Zombies bhi ab intelligent ho gye hain. Strategy, romance aur revenge teeno krte hain🤣🤣🤣
No 1,TheNotorious@zombieland but zombies abhi bhi dead hain😝Rudra pe kuch tippani kijiye shriman savinay nivedan hai.
Rudra dekha nhi h.
@zombieland but zombies abhi bhi dead hain😝Rudra pe kuch tippani kijiye shriman savinay nivedan hai.
Army of dead dekha? Zombies bhi ab intelligent ho gye hain. Strategy, romance aur revenge teeno krte hain🤣🤣🤣
Horror h kya? Kaisi h
@Duryodhan bhai ye batao why is Forum asking for login so often these days ??Also my Bhim app is down since last week.Vested interests??
masteroptimist,SeeBhaktiyar khilji ke baare me padha, he burnt down Nalanda in 1200 ce, obviously reason was to scare the population into submission and destroy the intellectual resistance.
If kisi ne JL mehta padhi hogi to u will know he talks about holocaust during establishment of Islamic rule.
Around the same time Mongol invasions shuru hue the, central Asia me where the tradition was to kill everyone who resisted. Khwarizm empire ko destroy karne ke strategy zabardast thi. They destroyed every city in Persia at that time and killed large population.
Now the point where Bhaktiyar khilji is relevant here is Siege of Baghdad 1259, if u read it you will know that it is end of Islamic golden age, Islamic literature ka hub Baghdad me tha, Mongols burnt down the library which continued for many days( just like Nalanda), this apart from killing of entire Baghdad population,killing of Caliph by trampling horses over him.
This when Mongols wre yet to accept Islamic faith btw.
The point iam trying to make is, RW Wale usually try to draw conclusions based on some historical facts for which they try and draw a historical responsibility of present day Muslim population in the subcontinent.
We all draw conclusions according to what suits our logic, above mentioned sari batein facts hai
To agar:
1. Ye kaha jaye ki battle tactics like killing entire towns and cities were common in that time, can it be said to be correct? Is this perspective modern one or medieval one?
2. Do Persian and central Asian population still abhor their Mongol history?
Main kisi ki side nahi le raha hu, bas ye bata raha hu history ko apne tarike se interpret karke samjhane Wale bohot authors milenge, lekin as said ki apne ko bhi ye dekhna hai ki which one seems more credible.
Teacher chahe jo bhi bataye, lekin marks lane ke liye kya likhna hai ye bhi hume hi sochna padega.
EDIT: BHAIYON MUJHE PELNA NAHI, MAIN KOI ARGUMENT KARNE KE HALAT ME NAHI HU. 😹😹😹
RaGa,@RaGa bhai but ye argument real world me bahut dilemma create karti hai.I gave the same reply to a peer from Kashmir ki whtever happned ther is because of war tactics but at human level one cant justify banality of evil man!!
Main medieval era ki baat kar Raha hu veere, 1989 me jo hua wo to wrong hi hai.
The thing is left wing historians ne apni hegemony bnayi hui h nd dusre views/ historians ko cancel kr dete h .
A secular country shouldn't be afraid of its communal history nd historians mustn't sugarcoat its history selectively to achieve some political goals . It will just backfire.
I wonder if European historians do the same. Do they hide the all the past events of warfare and hostilities among various European nations, just to make sure that the idea of European unity remains strong? I don't think so.
To assume that Hindus will call for muslim massacre if they get to know these events is utter nonsense. I think sugarcoating our medieval history is doing more damage.
@RaGa okay.Kya kisi ko aisa lagta hai Scroll,Quint ye sab ek type ka intellectual po$% hai and most of us are affected beacuse of it??
Scroll nd the wire, Zee news k bhi baap h propaganda m
Bhaktiyar khilji ke baare me padha, he burnt down Nalanda in 1200 ce, obviously reason was to scare the population into submission and destroy the intellectual resistance.
If kisi ne JL mehta padhi hogi to u will know he talks about holocaust during establishment of Islamic rule.
Around the same time Mongol invasions shuru hue the, central Asia me where the tradition was to kill everyone who resisted. Khwarizm empire ko destroy karne ke strategy zabardast thi. They destroyed every city in Persia at that time and killed large population.
Now the point where Bhaktiyar khilji is relevant here is Siege of Baghdad 1259, if u read it you will know that it is end of Islamic golden age, Islamic literature ka hub Baghdad me tha, Mongols burnt down the library which continued for many days( just like Nalanda), this apart from killing of entire Baghdad population,killing of Caliph by trampling horses over him.
This when Mongols wre yet to accept Islamic faith btw.
The point iam trying to make is, RW Wale usually try to draw conclusions based on some historical facts for which they try and draw a historical responsibility of present day Muslim population in the subcontinent.
We all draw conclusions according to what suits our logic, above mentioned sari batein facts hai
To agar:
1. Ye kaha jaye ki battle tactics like killing entire towns and cities were common in that time, can it be said to be correct? Is this perspective modern one or medieval one?
2. Do Persian and central Asian population still abhor their Mongol history?
Main kisi ki side nahi le raha hu, bas ye bata raha hu history ko apne tarike se interpret karke samjhane Wale bohot authors milenge, lekin as said ki apne ko bhi ye dekhna hai ki which one seems more credible.
Teacher chahe jo bhi bataye, lekin marks lane ke liye kya likhna hai ye bhi hume hi sochna padega.
So in baghdad is there any prominent place named after Genghis khan like bakhitiyarpur station in Bihar?
Duryodhan,Army of dead dekha? Zombies bhi ab intelligent ho gye hain. Strategy, romance aur revenge teeno krte hain🤣🤣🤣
.
@RaGa okay.Kya kisi ko aisa lagta hai Scroll,Quint ye sab ek type ka intellectual po$% hai and most of us are affected beacuse of it??
Sabka apna dimag rehta hai bhai, koi galat ya sahi nahi rehta ,atleast in history. Waise main wo kuch bhi nahi padhta hu so no idea abt their intellectual potential 😹
Write your comment…
