November 4, 2024   Academy | Blog  | Community  | Our Philosophy
Subscribe to ForumIAS
Nov 04, 2024  Academy | Blog  | Community  | Our Philosophy
1
Create
Create
Share GyanWrite an Article and share your knowledge or something you have learned recently.
Ask QuestionStart a discussion, ask a question, or ask for an opinion
Sign in

Doubt Clearance Thread: UPSC 2021

"When in doubt, observe and ask questions. When certain, observe at length and ask many more questions."

Created this thread as a one stop solution for all members so that all the doubts wherein any conceptual clarification is required can be solved here. 

jack_Sparrow,curious_kidand122 otherslike this
1.3m views

4.2k comments

Nikesaid

Which of the following statements is/are correct?

  1. The Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate water disputes.
  2. The Writ Jurisdiction is both original as well as appellate.

Select the correct option using the codes given below:

A. 1 only 

B. 2 only 

C. Both 1 and 2 

D Neither 1 nor 2

A- It is upto parliament to set up a body or tribunal to deal with them. The supreme court intervention is sought as a special leave to petition and not as a matter of right.


TwoFace,Nike
3.4k views

Wats_there_in_a_namesaid

With reference toMarine protected areas.were they established by WPA1972? Are they defined anywhere? 

yes they are designated under WPA, 1972

https://vikaspedia.in/energy/environment/biodiversity-1/the-coastal-ecosystem

Wats_there_in_a_name,TwoFaceand1 otherslike this
3.6k views

AlexanderSupertrampsaid

Nikesaid

Which of the following statements is/are correct?

  1. The Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate water disputes.
  2. The Writ Jurisdiction is both original as well as appellate.

Select the correct option using the codes given below:

A. 1 only 

B. 2 only 

C. Both 1 and 2 

D Neither 1 nor 2

A- It is upto parliament to set up a body or tribunal to deal with them. The supreme court intervention is sought as a special leave to petition and not as a matter of right.


Marked the same. But the answer given was B. Seems like an error. Thanks. 

3.3k views
@Nike I think you have to look at both the statements independently. 
Statement 1 is false because " SC has jurisdiction to adjudicate  water disputes irrespective of whether it is brought throught writ petition or by way of appeal". Read this article - https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/sc-judgment-on-120-year-old-cauvery-dispute-today/articleshow/62941364.cms
Statement 2 is True because " SC in its earlier judgements had said that wherever remedy is available  for violation of fundamental rights under a HC, one must approach it for issuance of writs or orders and if it is denied one can approach the SC by appeal demanding issuance of writs. 


Aragorn001,Nikeand1 otherslike this
3.8k views

Neyawnsaid

Did the IVC people know about Alloys? Think and tell me@zoidberg 

yes they knew about it...bronze statue of IVC... tin and copper

Neyawn,
3.7k views
SF6  has a lifetime of 3200 yrs , then why it is under short lived climate pollutants ?? 
3.8k views

jyotidahiya92588said

SF6  has a lifetime of 3200 yrs , then why it is under short lived climate pollutants ?? 

SF6 is short lived in the atmosphere. The shelf life when used along with some other substance is higher as it is stable and inert. 

5.7k views
@upsc2020 thnk you


3.8k views

is judiciary included in art 12 of Constitution?
but it has rule making powers....so can the laws/orders passed by judiciary be held violative of Constitution under article 13??

also judiciary is called quasi- legislative body right?

found one answer on quora of lawyer of SC satisfactory but still wanted views of senior members here.

Please explain in simple and lucid terms. 


3.9k views
@Itachi Administrative side of judiciary may come under definition of article 12 but the judicial side doesn't come under the definition of state as you can't file a writ under Article 32 or 226 against judiciary for violation of FR.


Itachi,Aragorn001
3.8k views
Decision of Speaker regarding declaring a bill as money bill is not open to judicial review. Is this statement correct as given in laxmikanth, in the light of 2018 Aadhar judgement. Please clarify what should be the final position. Thanks
3.8k views

HarveySpectresaid

Decision of Speaker regarding declaring a bill as money bill is not open to judicial review. Is this statement correct as given in laxmikanth, in the light of 2018 Aadhar judgement. Please clarify what should be the final position. Thanks

Leave exceptions and accept generalized views given in the standard books especially NCERTs. In law matters, until and unless honorable SC with a CONSTITUTIONAL BENCH ANNOUNCES (not just do it) something NEW as future truth, only previous truth shall be accepted. 


So as of now, Laxminkanth view stands true if asked as a general statement. But if upsc clearly add riders like NO MONEY BILL DECISION EVER CHALLENGED IN SC then it should be untrue. 



(https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/supreme-court-to-examine-whether-lok-sabha-speakers-decision-can-be-scrutinised/articleshow/62544147.cms)


I hope this clear your doubt. Apply same to all such polity / law doubts. 

Deepak802,HarveySpectreand2 otherslike this
4.8k views

Yes Sir@Yo_Yo_Choti_Singh  Thanks for replying! 

3.8k views

What is the difference between appointment by President and appointment by Central government.. 


3.5k views

On forum had read once that Whip is mentioned in parliament statute "THE LEADERS AND CHIEF WHIPS OF RECOGNISED PARTIES AND GROUPS IN PARLIAMENT (FACILITIES) ACT, 1998" https://mpa.gov.in/sites/default/files/actwhip.pdf 

What should be the final position? Above ques came today in IASBABA All India open mock-2 and they considered that it is not mentioned anywhere. Please clarify. Thanks

plmokn25688524,INVICTUS21
3.8k views
@HarveySpectre Whip is not mentioned anywhere. It is based on the parliamentary conventions. The second statement is taken from Laxmikant. So, answer will be C. 


3.6k views
@HarveySpectre  You are right. Whip is mentioned in this 1999 Act. I have read this in Vision Test paper. It is wrongly given in Laxmikant


HarveySpectre,
2.9k views
@govindkishore_bits1229739  Laxmikant does not update it man


2.9k views

@Yo_Yo_Choti_Singh @Neyawn @root @Upsc_2020 can someone please clarify. this is getting confusing due to different interpretation by everyone. 

3.8k views
Write your comment…