Subscribe to ForumIAS

Official: SFG / RLG All Tests Discussions in one place

Hello All,

The Group usage here is a little cumbersome, so I am creating this thread to make sure that all questions with doubts stay in one place. Can someone push all the doubts and queries here? I will make this an announcement?


-Faceless, Anonymous "root"

jack_Sparrow,curious_kidand56 otherslike this
451k views

1.4k comments

@Thinker 

Test 6 Q44 

Statement 1 

Balsams or jewel weeds

[These plants are native to eastern Himalayas.

Why this statement is wrong??]

The word only is not given in the statement so the statement 1 should be right , 

Attaching the screenshot of the explanation provided .

@Mzp662829541 

From where you did get this pdf?

1.7k views
It is there with the weekly result.


Raillife,
2.6k views
It is there with the weekly result.


@Mzp662829541 

Did they start giving the explanation?

Or it's just for today only?

1.7k views
Answer provided in answer key for Question no. 38 in Test no. 6 SFG batch-2 given wrong answer must be D as all option are correct. 
Am giving link of source that is "
2.2k views

Regarding answer key


Please check the question number 8 of SFG-2 Test-3. The answer provided in answer key is contradicting the book. 

1.8k views

Test 7 Q46 Does district court have power to punish for its contempt of court ?

1.4k views
@mickeyviru No. Only Supreme Court and High Courts have power to punish for contempt of court.

For the contempt of a district court, High Court has the power to punish. 

And Supreme Court has the power to punish for contempt of any court in india.


1.9k views

Q.26 answer key says conduct of judges cannot be discussed...but it can be discussed when an impeachment motion is under consideration

Amonga,
2.1k views
@mickeyviru No. Only Supreme Court and High Courts have power to punish for contempt of court.

For the contempt of a district court, High Court has the power to punish. 

And Supreme Court has the power to punish for contempt of any court in india.


OK Thanks 

1.4k views
@thesaurabh0686 statement should have been complete 


2.5k views

Q.26 answer key says conduct of judges cannot be discussed...but it can be discussed when an impeachment motion is under consideration

Hello,

I am not aware of the question, and I am not a part of the Academy Team, but here is the thing. In such questions, always consider two ways to decide the case

#1 Can the Statement be generally held true? If yes then we consider it as correct

#2 If I negate / opposite of the statement, then does it stay right or wrong? For example, the statement "conduct of judges can be discussed in the Parliament" can we say that it is true? We cannot say it . So we will hold the first statement to be true.


Please do not check the truth value of a statement.Otherwise what will happen is that even in simple questions, you will make an error. For example, It is the President who summons the House. Now if you think that in absence of the President, who will do this, then there will be someone, so you will get it wrong.



Blueberry,Raillifeand1 otherslike this
2.7k views

rootsaid

Q.26 answer key says conduct of judges cannot be discussed...but it can be discussed when an impeachment motion is under consideration

Hello,

I am not aware of the question, and I am not a part of the Academy Team, but here is the thing. In such questions, always consider two ways to decide the case

#1 Can the Statement be generally held true? If yes then we consider it as correct

#2 If I negate / opposite of the statement, then does it stay right or wrong? For example, the statement "conduct of judges can be discussed in the Parliament" can we say that it is true? We cannot say it . So we will hold the first statement to be true.


Please do not check the truth value of a statement.Otherwise what will happen is that even in simple questions, you will make an error. For example, It is the President who summons the House. Now if you think that in absence of the President, who will do this, then there will be someone, so you will get it wrong.



This was helpful

1.4k views

Can someone post the link where the explanation sheet can be found

3.3k views
I think they have not uploaded the explanation sheet today.


2.6k views

Q.26 answer key says conduct of judges cannot be discussed...but it can be discussed when an impeachment motion is under consideration

Then which answer key were u talking about?!

3.3k views

Hi 

Is there any need to read the chapter of special status of jk?

Saagar,
1.7k views

Also this part? As all this are not applicable now

Mzp6628,Saagar
1.7k views

Hello..this ?? is written at the base of the answerkey of test 8. Does it mean that syllabus for tomorrow is not the one mentioned in the schedule ? 


1.9k views

@Neyawn @Thinker 

@root 

Q.21


CARA is statutory body of Ministry of Women & Child Development established under Juvenile Justice Act, 2015.answer of Q.21 should be C


Q.49

Water disputes Act 1956 does not empower parliament.it empowers centre to set up ad hoc tribunal

answer of Q.49 should be C


Q.32

Why is option C wrong. Isn’t it a vague statement?ans can be either A or D

2.1k views
Deleted

SFG-2 Test-8 Q.No.34(25th feb)

Please rectify the answer key of Q.No.34.The 2nd statement i.e.State govt.can borrow only from within india is correct.So the ans.should be option-C-Both1&2.

shubhendu,Yashrajsillodkar
1.9k views
Write your comment…