November 25, 2024   Academy | Blog  | Community  | Our Philosophy
Subscribe to ForumIAS
Nov 25, 2024  Academy | Blog  | Community  | Our Philosophy
1
Create
Create
Share GyanWrite an Article and share your knowledge or something you have learned recently.
Ask QuestionStart a discussion, ask a question, or ask for an opinion
Sign in

[official][prelims 2023] How was prelims result? In or out?

Vote people, Vote!

And share!

DM,VERMA_KIRANDEVI_LALBAHADURand12 otherslike this
311.3k views

747 comments

@Tejasjv  Yeah....but a little subjective here also......JS is recommended but NECESSARY.....?.......I may be mixing things up but paper me mainey socha ki finance bill 75 days me pass krna hai islye NECESSARY................


4.5k views
@Tejasjv Bhai, prs ke screenshot mein Jo likha hai, wo tumhare point ko counter karta hai
Yahaan pe to clearly finance bill and financial bill ke difference ko samajh sakte hai

Baat bas ye hai ki finance bill and financial bill dono ka hindi translation "vitt vidheyak" hi hota hai


4.1k views
Exactly...... Finance bill is an umbrella term for all 110, 117(1) and 117(3). So, UPSC should have formulated the question better. 

Now, i will show you many articles in everyday news where they consider finance bill as something other than money bill . 
4k views

BUT IT DEFINITELY IS NOT "THE FINANCE BILL,2023" which coaching institutes are quoting. THE FINANCE BILL, 2023 is the name of the bill...... not type of the bill...its a money bill....like CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT BILL was a CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT bill...... "THE FINANCE BILL, 2023"  is not the only finance bill right..... every financial bill is also a finance bill.......so, both answers should be correct. Both interpretations should be correct. 


Existential Enigma,
4k views

From the language of the question it appears that Examiner has treated Finance Bill and Money Bill as two different entities.


If we consider Finace Bill and Money Bill to be same then the question becomes pointless.


Clearly there is a drafting issue in question. It could have been framed better.


In present form, Byjus has given answer as "B" (two only), this answer seems most appropriate (as per them, 1 & 2 correct, 3 incorrect, and they have treated Finance Bill to mean same as Financial Bill)

3.8k views
@Tejasjv ye sb theek hai.....lekin JS necessary?......B can also be right...?


4.2k views

yeah........could be..... joint sitting need not be mandatory i guess. B could also be right. 
I had thought 'JS  becomes necessary to pass the bill'......it is not mandatory definitely. It is not given anywhere that prez is obligated to call for a JS.

Hopefully UPSC doesnt get so technical about the language.


adi5manit330,
3.8k views

seesatsaid

@Tejasjv ye sb theek hai.....lekin JS necessary?......B can also be right...?


Joint sitting is not necessary. Joint sitting (as in the case with ordinary Bill) can be called. But it is not necessary.

3.7k views

@adi5manit330 But there is another thing. Finance bill HAS to be passed in 75 days..........so I guess JS is necessary if deadlock isn't solved till then.....


But maybe I am again mixing things up...........

4.1k views

CSAT key:

How much deviation is generally seen between vision key or other trustworthy sources and upsc key ?


I gave this year with lot of questions myself but again the exam posed a set of its own 


GS somehow survived , CSAT i am yet to be sure of qualifying

MichaelScarn,mvpand1 otherslike this
3.7k views

seesatsaid


@adi5manit330 But there is another thing. Finance bill HAS to be passed in 75 days..........so I guess JS is necessary if deadlock isn't solved till then.....


But maybe I am again mixing things up...........

75 days limit was introduced during the British period. Don't think it would have implied joint sitting at that time as Viceroy had far more powers.

3.7k views

I think that is "THE FINANCE BILL' which is a money bill.

Though, in a language sense also.... you can argue that ' a joint sitting becomes necessary for financial bill in case of disagreement between LS and RS' . I think upsc just wanted to ask if joint sitting provision is there or not.

Anyway......Jai UPSC . Massive respect for their wording of questions. Agar ye question jayega, tho jaaye....


3.6k views

I mean........budget document "THE FINANCE BILL" should be passed in 75 days.... I think...


3.6k views

The squirrels question too.....

"Indian squirrels" is given.......India has so many types of squirrels... Himalayan marmot has nests in burrows.....they bury nuts and are omnivores. 

But I dont think UPSC is going to accept this argument. Unka apna hi hotha hai. 

3.6k views

seesatsaid


@adi5manit330 But there is another thing. Finance bill HAS to be passed in 75 days..........so I guess JS is necessary if deadlock isn't solved till then.....


But maybe I am again mixing things up...........

Your argument is - since Bill must be passed within 75 days therefore JS is necessary. But kindly note that JS does not guarantee that Bill will be passed. As JS can also reject the Bill (it depends on how numbers are stacked in JS). Hence the argument that for the Bill to pass JS is necessary, is not valid. JS does not guarantee passage within 75 days.


There might be some mixing up of concepts.



seesat,
3.4k views

scoring 63 after deducting all questions which are doubtful! 

Given the fact that 7-8 questions can overturn in upsc answer keys, should there be a hope? or should i head for the next year? OBC

3k views
Bhailog any consensus on the finance bill question?
2.6k views
Deleted

I contacted the UN body spokesperson regarding the GCM question. They replied back. This settles the GCM question.

The answer would be D. None. This is the reply.

" 

  • No it doesn't. IDPs are out of the scope of the GCM. However

  • One action recommended by Member States is to integrate displacement considerations into disaster preparedness strategies.

  • Recap: GCM only covers migration issues. Refugees and IDPs fall outside its scope. Which exam are you taking? 

    "


GaryVee,AureliusMand4 otherslike this
2.6k views

Tejasjvsaid

I contacted the UN body spokesperson regarding the GCM question. They replied back. This settles the GCM question.

The answer would be D. None. This is the reply.

" 

  • No it doesn't. IDPs are out of the scope of the GCM. However

  • One action recommended by Member States is to integrate displacement considerations into disaster preparedness strategies.

  • Recap: GCM only covers migration issues. Refugees and IDPs fall outside its scope. Which exam are you taking? 

    "


Bhai sahab 

GaryVee,Street_lampand1 otherslike this
2.5k views
Can you now contact UNEP or CCAC for the HFC question?
GaryVee,Street_lamp
2.3k views
Write your comment…