[official][prelims 2023] How was prelims result? In or out?
Vote people, Vote!
And share!
I contacted the UN body spokesperson regarding the GCM question. They replied back. This settles the GCM question.
The answer would be D. None. This is the reply.
"
No it doesn't. IDPs are out of the scope of the GCM. However
One action recommended by Member States is to integrate displacement considerations into disaster preparedness strategies.
Recap: GCM only covers migration issues. Refugees and IDPs fall outside its scope. Which exam are you taking?
"
Kafi Tejasvi Log hai yahan
DrKingSchultz100,
plmokn25688524,aryabhata
Existential Enigma,
Guys,
kisi ne wo China India proportion of irrigated land pe representation file ki hai kya?
P.S: Options debate nahi karna tha.......Bas ye jaan na tha ki log sirf yaha pe discuss karthe hai ya representation bhi file karthe hai.
P.P.S: I have filed representation on that finance bill and money bill Q
plmokn25688524,Existential EnigmaGuys,
kisi ne wo China India proportion of irrigated land pe representation file ki hai kya?
P.S: Options debate nahi karna tha.......Bas ye jaan na tha ki log sirf yaha pe discuss karthe hai ya representation bhi file karthe hai.
P.P.S: I have filed representation on that finance bill and money bill Q
@Immortalknight had said that he will file for A as the answer. Also, what have u argued regarding money bill question?
plmokn25688524,ThePrince
That finance bill can be interpreted as umbrella term for money and financial bills.......I put in many sources to validate........so.......C should also be a possible answer.Coming to the statement 3 of that question, "joint sitting become NECESSARY " thing........I felt and till now feel "In case of disagreement between LS and RS, JS becomes necessary to pass the bill..So filed for them to consider both interpretations and consider both A and C. I put sources for both. And argued how a candidate can interpret both ways.
Regarding statement - 3 -
We are inferring that question is asking to "pass" what's required. But question is not revolving around passage, it revolves around disagreement.
Below is what's written in statement - 3 of QP -
"In the case of disagreement between the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha... a joint sitting becomes necessary for Finance Bill."
Kindly note, nowhere it's written to pass or to not pass. It simply states in case of disagreement a joint sitting is necessary.
Moreover, if we treat Finance Bill as Money Bill then there is no provision for JS in case of Money Bill (Article 108) and if we treat Finance Bill as ordinary Bill then as per Article 108 of Constitution - in case of disagreement President "May" call for JS or May not. It's not necessary either.
Reference - Article 108
Averageaspirant,
50.point says that consumer lists are intagible as per ministry of corporate affairs.Also,hindi translation is daak suchi which invariably means it maybe tangible one.
So can the answer for tangible intangible question be only 2?
None of the coachings have considered this one
Point 50 says consumer lists are not intangible. So the answer to intagible question can be 2?also in hindi translation its written dark suchi.
Write your comment…
