Doubt Clearance Thread: UPSC 2021
"When in doubt, observe and ask questions. When certain, observe at length and ask many more questions."
Created this thread as a one stop solution for all members so that all the doubts wherein any conceptual clarification is required can be solved here.
gohilvishal912,EUROPOL19 March 2021 The Hindu article: Equities fall as U.S. bond yields rise on Fed stance
In this article, the Fed stance is mentioned as Dovish. I think the headline is contradictory and I am unable to understand it completely. Kindly help.
In Dovish policy, the interest rate will decrease to boost growth and inflation is not an issue. If U.S. bond yields are rising that means that bond price is low and this will happen if the demand for the bond is low. And if the demand is low then investors must be investing somewhere else like equities then why are equities falling??
chamomile,chamomile,A few doubts regarding emergency provisions in the constitution.
1. Regarding article 360, Financial emergency- Can the president declare a financial emergency in a part of India? Or does it has to be declared in the country as a whole?
2. Regarding article 359 (3), suspension of the right to move to court for the enforcement of fundament rights- It says that the presidential order should be laid before each house of parliament.
But laxmikanth mentions that - it should be laid before each house of parliamentfor approval.
Doubt- the constitution just mentions that it should be laid before the houses. I think that means just like the reports of various constitutional bodies that are laid before each house and discussion takes place on them. However, laxmikanth interprets it that it has to be laid before each house and be voted upon to get approval. Which is not mentioned in the constitution.
So which interpretation is right?
Animesh_Maths,
A few doubts regarding emergency provisions in the constitution.
1. Regarding article 360, Financial emergency- Can the president declare a financial emergency in a part of India? Or does it has to be declared in the country as a whole?
2. Regarding article 359 (3), suspension of the right to move to court for the enforcement of fundament rights- It says that the presidential order should be laid before each house of parliament.
But laxmikanth mentions that - it should be laid before each house of parliamentfor approval.
Doubt- the constitution just mentions that it should be laid before the houses. I think that means just like the reports of various constitutional bodies that are laid before each house and discussion takes place on them. However, laxmikanth interprets it that it has to be laid before each house and be voted upon to get approval. Which is not mentioned in the constitution.
So which interpretation is right?
Short answer:
1. He may declare it for a part of India as well, theoretically.
2. Your interpretation is correct.
PM for long answer if you need it?
chamomile,Animesh_MathsA few doubts regarding emergency provisions in the constitution.
1. Regarding article 360, Financial emergency- Can the president declare a financial emergency in a part of India? Or does it has to be declared in the country as a whole?
2. Regarding article 359 (3), suspension of the right to move to court for the enforcement of fundament rights- It says that the presidential order should be laid before each house of parliament.
But laxmikanth mentions that - it should be laid before each house of parliamentfor approval.
Doubt- the constitution just mentions that it should be laid before the houses. I think that means just like the reports of various constitutional bodies that are laid before each house and discussion takes place on them. However, laxmikanth interprets it that it has to be laid before each house and be voted upon to get approval. Which is not mentioned in the constitution.
So which interpretation is right?
Agar law ke nahi ho to time waste kar rahe ho.
A few doubts regarding emergency provisions in the constitution.
1. Regarding article 360, Financial emergency- Can the president declare a financial emergency in a part of India? Or does it has to be declared in the country as a whole?
2. Regarding article 359 (3), suspension of the right to move to court for the enforcement of fundament rights- It says that the presidential order should be laid before each house of parliament.
But laxmikanth mentions that - it should be laid before each house of parliamentfor approval.
Doubt- the constitution just mentions that it should be laid before the houses. I think that means just like the reports of various constitutional bodies that are laid before each house and discussion takes place on them. However, laxmikanth interprets it that it has to be laid before each house and be voted upon to get approval. Which is not mentioned in the constitution.
So which interpretation is right?
Agar law ke nahi ho to time waste kar rahe ho.
Pls ignore posted in wrong thread by mistake
What is the jurisdiction limit of permanent lok adalt..10 lakh or 1 crore.
https://nalsa.gov.in/lok-adalat/permanent-lok-adalat . In this limit is mentioned as 1 crore.
https://nalsa.gov.in/services/lok-adalat ..in this link limit mentioned is 10 lakh.
Both link from same website.
Lakshmikant mentioned as 10 lakh.
So which one is correct
What is the jurisdiction limit of permanent lok adalt..10 lakh or 1 crore.
https://nalsa.gov.in/lok-adalat/permanent-lok-adalat . In this limit is mentioned as 1 crore.
https://nalsa.gov.in/services/lok-adalat ..in this link limit mentioned is 10 lakh.
Both link from same website.
Lakshmikant mentioned as 10 lakh.
So which one is correct
The jurisdiction of the Permanent Lok Adalats is upto Rs. One Crore.
Write your comment…
