"When in doubt, observe and ask questions. When certain, observe at length and ask many more questions."
Created this thread as a one stop solution for all members so that all the doubts wherein any conceptual clarification is required can be solved here.
@upsc2020 Areh why to take everything in negative way? I felt let others answer. If answer posted here , I may see it without answering 🤦🏻♂️. Let’s be positive towards others. Thread was so inactive these days.
The way you said wasn't in a positive way either.
@Villanelle Answer says C. Didn't explain though.
Okay. I'm still not entirely sold on this but, since the option doesn't take into account the democratic part at all. Question could have easily asked about what does mixed economy entail with regards to India and it would have still been C.
The meaning given in option C takes precedence only when Democratic Socialism is contrasted with State Socialism or Communist Socialism, which entails complete nationalization of means of production. Outside of the context, Democratic Socialism would first mean achieving for socialist goals through non violent, democratic means. Very possible question was picked straight from Laxmikant, hence C is the answer.
Okay. I'm still not entirely sold on this but, since the option doesn't take into account the democratic part at all. Question could have easily asked about what does mixed economy entail with regards to India and it would have still been C.
The meaning given in option C takes precedence only when Democratic Socialism is contrasted with State Socialism or Communist Socialism, which entails complete nationalization of means of production. Outside of the context, Democratic Socialism would first mean achieving for socialist goals through non violent, democratic means. Very possible question was picked straight from Laxmikant, hence C is the answer.
Does democratic socialism support the notion of natural inequality? Wouldn't constitutional democracy with natural inequality be liberalism?
Does democratic socialism support the notion of natural inequality? Wouldn't constitutional democracy with natural inequality be liberalism?
Tbh, socialism seeks to do away with only social inequalities like unequal distribution of resources, wealth, equal opportunity and so on. It cannot remove natural inequality which will continue to exist on account of myriad physical differences. BUT, that said I get your point. Definitely over-thought this one.